Download pdf
Maritime Disputes from a Global Perspective and Solutions under International Law
- 1 Southwest Petroleum University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study explores the utilization and challenges of international laws in resolving global maritime disputes through a detailed analysis of representative cases from South America, Africa, and Asia. It highlights the crucial role of international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), in providing a legal framework and dispute resolution mechanisms. However, the study also identifies significant challenges, including political interference, legal ambiguity, and enforcement issues. By comparing regional dispute settlement mechanisms, the study demonstrates the effectiveness of multilateral negotiations in South America, regional legal frameworks in Africa, and a combination of multilateral and unilateral actions in Asia. Based on these insights, the study proposes several recommendations to enhance the international legal framework, promote regional cooperation, and innovate dispute resolution mechanisms. These measures aim to ensure fair and effective resolution of maritime disputes, maintain maritime peace and stability, and promote the healthy development of global ocean governance.
Keywords
Maritime disputes, international law, UNCLOS, dispute resolution mechanisms
[1]. Xing, W. W. (2018). Conflict and complementarity: Negotiation and adjudication in maritime delimitation disputes. Boundary and Ocean Studies, 3(04), 76-97.
[2]. Kong, L. J. (2022). Several important issues in the consultation on the "Code of Conduct in the South China Sea." Boundary and Ocean Studies, 7(06), 3-19.
[3]. Chen, Y. (2019). Study on the "gray zone" of overlapping continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles and exclusive economic zone in the northern Bay of Bengal boundary dispute. Asia-Pacific Security and Ocean Research, (02), 37-53+2-3.
[4]. McIntyre, O. (2010). The proceduralisation and growing maturity of international water law: Case concerning pulp mills on the river Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), ICJ, 20 April 2010. Journal of Environmental Law, 22(3), 475-497.
[5]. Duarte, É. E., & Kenkel, K. M. (2019). Contesting perspectives on South Atlantic maritime security governance: Brazil and South Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 26(3), 395-412.
[6]. Kadagi, N. I., Okafor-Yarwood, I., Glaser, S., & Lien, Z. (2020). Joint management of shared resources as an alternative approach for addressing maritime boundary disputes: the Kenya-Somalia maritime boundary dispute. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 16(3), 348-370.
[7]. Baye, F. (2010). Implications of the Bakassi conflict resolution for Cameroon. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 10(1).
[8]. Pemmaraju, S. R. (2016). The South China sea arbitration (The Philippines v. China): Assessment of the award on jurisdiction and admissibility. Chinese Journal of International Law, 15(2), 265-307.
[9]. Van Dyke, J. M. (Ed.). (2009). Maritime boundary disputes, settlement processes, and the law of the sea (Vol. 65). BRILL.
[10]. Zhao, H. (2023). From "contract" to "quasi-judicial": The development path of international dispute resolution and the reform of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Tsinghua Law, (06), 108-123.
Cite this article
Ding,Z. (2024).Maritime Disputes from a Global Perspective and Solutions under International Law.Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,66,34-42.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of Turkey's Current Corruption Situation: Laws, Economic lmpact and Government Analysis - ICILLP 2024
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).