Download pdf
The Challenges of Teachers Using Digital Games for Game-based Learning in Primary, Middle and High Schools
- 1 The University of Edinburgh
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Using digital games for game-based learning provides great potential for language learning. However, game-based learning differs from gamification, which teachers may be more familiar with, and it presents numerous conceptual and technical challenges to current front-line teachers, who are considered essential for the success of any technology integration project in schools. It is undeniable that the implementation and effectiveness of game-based learning significantly relies on the willingness of classroom teachers to embrace it. Therefore, this article explores front-line teachers’ understanding and attitudes toward using digital games for game-based learning and its application in teaching. 4 front-line teachers from the primary, middle and high school levels in China participated in this qualitative study. Data for the study were gathered through semi-structured interviews and subsequently analyzed using thematic and content analysis. According to the findings of the study, the participating teachers showed negative attitudes towards using digital games for language learning purposes, and almost all participants had difficulty distinguishing between game-based learning and gamification; In addition, all participating teachers showed their limited ability in using game-based learning strategies as educational support in teaching. This research aims to enhance the understanding of English teachers’ perceptions and attitudes toward using digital games for game-based learning in the Chinese context, potentially leading to constructive recommendations for educational authorities. Moreover, relevant teaching resources, including teacher training programs, can be further tailored to meet the specific needs of educators.
Keywords
Teachers’ perspective, ELT, game-based learning, digital game
[1]. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
[2]. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & education, 52(2), 302-312.
[3]. Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R., & Valcke, M. (2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & education, 67, 21-35.
[4]. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
[5]. Silverman, D. (2016). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[6]. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[7]. Thomas, G. (2017). How to do your research project: A guide for students. Sage.
[8]. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods(Vol. 5). sage.
[9]. Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook. sage.
[10]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[11]. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.
[12]. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Cite this article
Huang,L. (2024). The Challenges of Teachers Using Digital Games for Game-based Learning in Primary, Middle and High Schools. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,74,59-65.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICILLP 2024 Workshop: Today's College Students and Faculty: How AI is Transforming Their Behaviors, Legally
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).