
The Implementation Date and Disclosure Date in China's Securities False Statements
- 1 Zhoukou Normal University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Since the issuance of the Securities Law of the People's Republic of China as amended in 2019 and the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Hearing Cases of Tort Compensation for False Statements in the Securities Market as amended in 2022, the standards for identifying the implementation date and disclosure date have been gradually improved. But faced with a variety of judicial cases, relevant laws and regulations are still inadequate. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the theories and judicial cases of execution day and disclosure day with the ideas of various scholars, some suggestions on the improvement of the theory of implementation day and disclosure day are put forward. It is hoped that it will be helpful to determine the scope of damage compensation in the false statement of securities in our country.
Keywords
Day of execution , Day of disclosure,Securities Law
[1]. Guangdong Provincial High People's Court, Jiangsu Baoqianli Video Technology Group Co., LTD., a case of liability dispute over securities false statements, (2018) Yue Min End No. 439 Judgment.
[2]. Liaoning Provincial High People's Court, Dalian Dafu Holding Co., Ltd. and Deng Lizhu Securities False Statement Liability Dispute, (2019) Liao Min End No. 139 Judgment; Hainan High People's Court, Deng Xiantao and Hainan Haiyao Co., LTD., Securities False Statement Liability Dispute, (2019) Qiongmin Final 423 Judgment.
[3]. Zhang Jiao: Research on the Identification of Losses in Civil Compensation for Securities Misrepresentation, Master's degree thesis of Southwest University of Finance and Economics in 2020.
[4]. Shao Zijie, "Research on the Identification of Three time Points in Securities Misrepresentation Infringement Litigation", Master degree thesis of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, 2023.
[5]. Jinan Intermediate People's Court (2021) Lu 01 Civil Judgment No. 1697.
[6]. Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court (2015) Suizhong Law Jin Minchu Zi No. 430 Civil judgment.
[7]. Li Youxing, Pan Zheng. Legal Application of Luckin Coffee false Statement case: from the perspective of comparison of Chinese and American securities laws [J]. Application of Law,2020(09):118-128.
[8]. Guizhou Higher People's Court (2019) Qianmin End No. 1031 Civil judgment.
[9]. Tao Yusheng, Wu Feng, Liu Lei. The watershed of investors' claims: The determination of the "Disclosure Day of False Statements" [J]. Chinese Lawyers,2009(07):60-62.
[10]. Yang Xiang. Reexamination of the rules for determining the disclosure date of securities misrepresentation: around multiple partial disclosure situations [J]. Securities Law Review,2018(00):524-544.
[11]. Yang Xiang. On Determination of Disclosure Date in Securities misrepresentation Litigation [J]. Securities Law Review,2015(00):97-120.
[12]. Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court (2020) Yue 01 Civil Court No. 2171.
[13]. Cao Mingzhe. Justification interpretation of the date of notice and announcement of filing investigation as the date of disclosure of false statements [J]. Securities Court of Law,2019,26(01):341-358.
[14]. Zhang LAN: Research on the Scope of Civil Damage Compensation for Securities Misrepresentation in China, Master's degree thesis of Southwest University of Finance and Economics in 2020.
[15]. Hearing several difficult problems in the case of civil compensation for false statements in the securities market
[16]. Gong Liandi, Xie Chunhui. Identification of material information in securities misrepresentation disputes [J]. People's Justice,2014(12):52-56.
[17]. Liao Sheng. On the identification of the Disclosure Date of False Statements [J]. Research of Private Law,2017,21(01):307-324.
Cite this article
Yang,Z. (2025). The Implementation Date and Disclosure Date in China's Securities False Statements. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,83,27-31.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).