Download pdf
Exploring AI Literacy Through the Expectancy-Value Framework: A Mixed-Methods Study of Chinese High School Students
- 1 International School of Beijing
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is important because it has the potential to influence every aspect of our daily lives. From solving problems to creating new opportunities, artificial intelligence will be a huge part of the future society. This study aims to explore Chinese high school students’ AI literacy from the four dimensions: awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics by using the expectancy-value theory. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including surveys of 478 students to assess their understanding of artificial intelligence and how much they know about it, along with qualitative interviews to explore specific suggestions towards the improvement of AI courses in school and AI applications in their schoolwork. Quantitative findings revealed that there are significant differences in the four dimensions of AI literacy that are: ethics, awareness, usage, and evaluation with tenth grade students showing higher scores. Students’ AI literacy was influenced by their expectancy and value beliefs. There is no significant difference between school types for awareness, evaluation, usage but ethics. These findings highlight the impact of AI-related resources on students’ ethical perceptions. The structural equation modelling revealed the hypothesized model is a good representation of the data. Then the multi group equation modelling revealed the hypothesized model fits well across groups. Here, the groups mean students who participated in AI clubs or not. Qualitative themes highlighted the benefits of AI in enhancing productivity and learning, challenges in evaluating AI-generated information, ethical concerns about artificial intelligence usage, as well as the desire for more support and education to enhance AI literacy. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating AI literacy education into school curricula to enhance students' understanding and practical application of AI.
Keywords
AI literacy, expectancy, value
[1]. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
[2]. Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10(64). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4
[3]. Wang, F., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Zhou, Y. (2023). University students’ intentions to learn artificial intelligence: The roles of supportive environments and expectancy–value beliefs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00417-2
[4]. Sing, C. C., Teo, T., Huang, F., Chiu, T. K., & Xing Wei, W. (2022). Secondary school students’ intentions to learn AI: Testing moderation effects of readiness, social good and optimism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 765-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10111-1
[5]. Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098
[6]. Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(29). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
[7]. Parmar, N. (2024). High schoolers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in medicine. Journal of Student Research, 13(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100550
[8]. Soesanto, R. H., Dirgantoro, K. P. S., & Priyanti, N. (2022). Indonesian students’ perceptions towards AI-based learning in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(3), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i3.pp531-548
[9]. Zhang, H., Lee, I., Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Cheng, Y., & Breazeal, C. (2022). Integrating ethics and career futures with technical learning to promote AI literacy for middle school students: An exploratory study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 290–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00293-3
[10]. Lee, J. E., & Maeng, U. (2023). Perceptions of high school students on AI chatbots use in English learning: Benefits, concerns, and ethical consideration. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.25256/PAAL.27.2.4
[11]. Ng, D. T. K., Su, J., Leung, J. K. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy education in secondary schools: a review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6204-6224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2255228
[12]. Kong, S.-C., Cheung, W. M.-Y., & Tsang, O. (2023). Evaluating an artificial intelligence literacy programme for empowering and developing concepts, literacy and ethical awareness in senior secondary students. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4703–4724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11408-7
[13]. Kong, S.-C., Cheung, M.-Y. W., & Tsang, O. (2024). Developing an artificial intelligence literacy framework: Evaluation of a literacy course for senior secondary students using a project-based learning approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100214
[14]. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (2009). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[15]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cite this article
Julie,F.Z. (2025). Exploring AI Literacy Through the Expectancy-Value Framework: A Mixed-Methods Study of Chinese High School Students. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,89,16-29.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).