Download pdf
The Construction of Policy Discourse Power of American Think Tanks from the Perspective of Field Theory: Taking the Technological Containment of China as an Example
- 1 University of International Relations
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
As a vital component of a country's cultural soft power, American think play a significant role in shaping policy through various mechanisms and channels, and their discourse power plays a significant role in policy - making. Since the 21st century, technological competition has emerged as a crucial factor affecting the global economic and social development pattern and competition pattern. American think tanks have increasingly targeted China and significantly influenced the US government's policies on technological containment of China by providing policy recommendations, spreading anti - China views, and connecting with decision - makers. Based on the field theory and taking 6 representative American think tanks as examples, this paper analyzes the ways in which American think tanks construct their discourse power in technological containment of China from multiple dimensions, providing references for Chinese think tanks to enhance their policy discourse power.
Keywords
American Think Tanks, Field Theory, Technological Containment of China, Construction of Policy Discourse Power
[1]. China Strategy Group. (2021). Asymmetric Competition: A Strategy for China & Technology.
[2]. Yu Xiaoyu. The Characteristics, trends and responses of the U.S. technological competition Strategy against China under the New Situation: An Analysis based on the report of the key U.S. think tanks. Innovation and Technology, 2022, 22(02): 85-92.
[3]. Hou Guanhua. American think Tanks' Views and Suggestions on Sino-US Science and technology Competition [J]. Journal of Information, 2021, 40(04): 33-41.
[4]. Jackson, Robert H. and Georg Sorensen. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, 45-46.
[5]. Fligstein, N. Innovation and domain theory. AMS Revision 11, 272-289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-021-00202-2.
[6]. Berman, E. P., & others. (2014). Fields of knowledge: Science, politics and publics in the neoliberal age. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[7]. Stephen Olson. The development of American think tanks may be a reference for China [J]. Open China Herald, 2014(4):17-23.
[8]. Li Jing. A Bourdieutian interpretation of the discourse structure of biosecurity in American think tanks: A case study of the Bipartisan BioDefense Committee [J]. Journal of Information, 2002, 41(06):66-71.
[9]. Dou Chao, LI Zheng, LIU Wei. Sanctions impact and firm risk: A study based on the US unilateral control list against China [J/OL]. Financial review, 2024, (4) : 58-87 [2024-11-28]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5865.F.20241105.1412.005.html.
[10]. White House nears unprecedented action on US investment inChina[ EB / OL] . [2024-12-14]. https://caliber.az/en/post/160090/.
[11]. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology[ EB / OL] . [ 2024 -12- 14 ] . https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcast/.
[12]. Liu Jianli. The possible impact of the US Chip and Science Act and China's response. China Development Review, 2022.
[13]. Liu Chang, Shen Si, Wang Dongbo, et al. Design and empirical research of analysis framework of China-related content of American think tanks from the perspective of Big Intelligence [J]. Library and Information Work, 2017, 68(12):77-94.
[14]. ATKINSON R D, FOOTE C. Is China catching up to the United States in innovation?[EB/OL]. (2019-04-08) https://itif.org/publications/2019/04/08/china-catching-united-states-innovation/
[15]. KENNEDY S. China’s uneven high-tech drive: Implications for the United States[R]. Washington: CSIS, 2020: 21-28.
[16]. SCOBELL A, BURKE E J, COOPER III C A, et al. China’s grand strategy: Trends, trajectories, and long-term competition[EB/OL]. (2020-07-24) https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2798.html.
[17]. COSTELLO J, RASSER M, LAMBERTH M. From plan to action: Operationalizing a U.S. national technology strategy[EB/OL]. (2021-11-30) https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/from-plan-to-action.
[18]. HASS R. The future of U. S. policy toward China[EB/OL]. (2021-03-30) https://www.brookings.edu/multi-chapter-report/the-future-of-us-policy-toward china.
[19]. HEATH T R. U.S. strategic competition with China[EB/OL]. (2021-06-22) https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA290-3.html.
[20]. GONZALES D. Securing 5G: A way forward in the U.S. and China security competition[EB/OL]. (2022-04-29) https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA435-4.html.
[21]. WEINSTEIN E S, LEE C, FEDASIUK R, et al. China’s state key laboratory system: A view into China’s innovation system[EB/OL]. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/chinas-state-key-laboratorysystem/.
[22]. SCHMID J, EDENFIELD N. Scientific and technological flows between the United States and China[EB/OL]. (2023-06-15) https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2308-1.html.
[23]. CLAY I., ATKINSON R. (2022, November). Wake Up, America: China Is Overtaking the United States in Innovation Output. [EB/OL]. (2023-01-01) https://itif.org/publications/2022/11/09/wake-america-china-overtaking-united-states-innovation-output/
[24]. Atkinson, R. D. (2024, September). China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries. Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2024/09/04/china-rapidly-becoming-leading-innovator-advanced-industries/
[25]. Ezell, S. (2024, September). How Innovative Is China in the Display Industry? Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2024/09/04/how-innovative-is-china-in-the-display-industry/
[26]. Omaar, H. (2024, August 26). How Innovative Is China in AI? Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. https://itif.org/publications/2024/08/26/how-innovative-is-china-in-ai/
[27]. Atkinson, R. D. How Innovative Is China in the Robotics Industry? [EB/OL]. (2024-03) https://itif.org/publications/2024/03/04/how-innovative-is-china-in-the-robotics-industry/.
[28]. CRANE K, HEATH T R, STARK A, ZHENG C. The Effectiveness of U.S. Economic Policies Regarding China Pursued from 2017 to 2024[EB/OL]. (2024) https://www.rand.org/t/RRA3055-1.
Cite this article
Wu,X. (2025). The Construction of Policy Discourse Power of American Think Tanks from the Perspective of Field Theory: Taking the Technological Containment of China as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,82,1-10.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).