Research Article
Open access
Published on 23 May 2025
Download pdf
Chen,D. (2025). Protectionism in Modern Economic System: Evaluating the US Trade Policies and the Impacts on China and Canada. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,97,6-12.
Export citation

Protectionism in Modern Economic System: Evaluating the US Trade Policies and the Impacts on China and Canada

Dingqi Chen *,1,
  • 1 Alexander College

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.LD23206

Abstract

This research examines how protectionist trade measures affect China and Canada, as both nations primarily encounter such trade barriers from the United States. A protectionist approach includes government-implemented defensive policies that protect domestic industries against foreign market interference by means of taxes and financial assistance alongside restriction limits. This type of control provides temporary economic advantages. However, protectionist policies maintained over time produce economic inefficiencies, together with market volatility that leads nations to take countermeasures, thus reducing market efficiency. China reacted to US tariffs through increased self-reliance combined with its “Dual Circulation Strategy” and international cooperative agreements to decrease dependency on Western market. The Canadian economy encountered major economic problems due to US tariff retaliation, because it depends heavily on US markets; thus, it initiated immediate actions to diversify trade through various agreements. This research focuses on how trade strategies prove the differing effects of protectionist policies through a comparative analysis that supports multilateral economic stability between protectionist interests and international trade relations.

Keywords

protectionist, tariff, trade diversification, “Dual Circulation Strategy”

[1]. Beaulieu, E., Leblond, P., Klemen, D., Cock, J., Dubuis, T., Vautour, C., & Vinod Kelly Daryanani, N. (2019, November 15). The Future of Canadian Trade Policy: Three Symposia on Canada’s Most Pressing Trade Policy Challenges. Social Science Research Network

[2]. Béland, D., Dinan, S., Rocco, P. and Waddan, A. (2021) Social policy responses to COVID‐19 in Canada and the United States: Explaining policy variations between two liberal welfare state regimes. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2), 280-294.

[3]. Dadush, U. (2023) American Protectionism. Revue d’Économie Politique, Vol. 133(4), 497–524.

[4]. Dadush, U. (2023) American Protectionism. Revue d’Économie Politique, Vol. 133(4), 497–524.

[5]. Guilherme, V. (2024) Shaping Nations and Markets, Identity Capital, Trade and the Populist Rage. London: Routledge.

[6]. Guo, J. and Johnston, C. M. T. (2020) Do protectionist trade policies integrate domestic markets? Evidence from the Canada-U.S. Staff Working Paper 2020-10, 2020, 1–20.

[7]. Huysmans, M. (2020) Exporting protection: EU trade agreements, geographical indications, and gastronationalism. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 1–28.

[8]. Olha, Y., Stašys, R., Tsygankova, T., Reznikova, N. and Uskova, D. (2021) Protectionism Sources of Trade Disputes within International Economic Relations. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 42(4), 516–526.

[9]. Van Assche, A. and Gangnes, B. (2019). Global Value Chains and the Fragmentation of Trade Policy Coalitions. Transnational Corporation, 26(1), 31-60.

[10]. Williams, N. (2019). The Resilience of Protectionism in U.S. Trade Policy. Boston University Law Review, 99, 683-719.

Cite this article

Chen,D. (2025). Protectionism in Modern Economic System: Evaluating the US Trade Policies and the Impacts on China and Canada. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,97,6-12.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceeding of ICGPSH 2025 Symposium: The Globalization of Connection: Language, Supply Chain, Tariff, and Trade Wars

ISBN:978-1-80590-137-2(Print) / 978-1-80590-138-9(Online)
Conference date: 25 June 2025
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Canh Thien Dang
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.97
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).