The Controversy of AI-Generated Technology in Artistic Creation

Research Article
Open access

The Controversy of AI-Generated Technology in Artistic Creation

Wanting Ma 1*
  • 1 School of Law, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China    
  • *corresponding author 1905226085@qq.com
LNEP Vol.90
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-085-6
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-086-3

Abstract

With the development of AI technology, particularly the emergence of models such as Stable Diffusion, AI-generated artworks have garnered widespread attention. The "creative" capabilities of AI rely on neural network technology, and the legality of its training data has become a focal point of controversy. Simultaneously, the issue of copyright ownership for AI-generated works urgently requires clarification. Furthermore, the impact of AI technology on traditional artistic creation, such as lowering the barriers to creation and threatening employment opportunities for practitioners, has sparked dissatisfaction among artists. This paper employs a combination of literature analysis and case studies to explore the controversies surrounding AI-generated technology in artistic creation, analyzing issues related to the legality of training data sources, copyright attribution, and its disruptive effects on traditional artistic practices. The study proposes strengthening the protection of original works, increasing transparency in AI training data sources, and establishing sound commercial use regulations for AI. These measures aim to balance public interests and individual rights, fostering harmonious development between AI technology and artistic creation.

Keywords:

Intellectual property, Intellectual property protection, Artificial intelligence, Copyright protection

Ma,W. (2025). The Controversy of AI-Generated Technology in Artistic Creation. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,90,84-88.
Export citation

References

[1]. Tao Ran. The Attribution of Liability for Copyright Infringement in AI-Generated Works[J]. Journal of Taiyuan Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 24(01):7-16.

[2]. Chen Zengbao. Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Copyright Law—Reflection on the Copyrightability and Infringement Risk Management[J]. Digital Law, 2023, (06):24-28.

[3]. Fan Xinghui. Risks and Solutions of Copyright Infringement in Artificial Intelligencegenerated Creations[J]. Henan Science and Technology, 2024, 51(24):105-108.

[4]. Wang Jingyu. Legal Mechanism of Multiple Interests Equity[J], Citizen and Law (Law Edition), 2023, 15(4): 45-58.

[5]. Zhang Wei. AI Sparks Copyright Disputes: Legal Policies Urgently Needed for Guidance [N]. Legal Daily, 2025-01-17(007).

[6]. Jia Man. Research on Copyright Infringement Issues in AI-Generated Artworks [J]. Communication and Copyright, 2023, (11): 121–124.


Cite this article

Ma,W. (2025). The Controversy of AI-Generated Technology in Artistic Creation. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,90,84-88.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

ISBN:978-1-80590-085-6(Print) / 978-1-80590-086-3(Online)
Editor:Enrique Mallen
Conference website: https://2025.icgpsh.org/
Conference date: 25 July 2025
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.90
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Tao Ran. The Attribution of Liability for Copyright Infringement in AI-Generated Works[J]. Journal of Taiyuan Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 24(01):7-16.

[2]. Chen Zengbao. Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Copyright Law—Reflection on the Copyrightability and Infringement Risk Management[J]. Digital Law, 2023, (06):24-28.

[3]. Fan Xinghui. Risks and Solutions of Copyright Infringement in Artificial Intelligencegenerated Creations[J]. Henan Science and Technology, 2024, 51(24):105-108.

[4]. Wang Jingyu. Legal Mechanism of Multiple Interests Equity[J], Citizen and Law (Law Edition), 2023, 15(4): 45-58.

[5]. Zhang Wei. AI Sparks Copyright Disputes: Legal Policies Urgently Needed for Guidance [N]. Legal Daily, 2025-01-17(007).

[6]. Jia Man. Research on Copyright Infringement Issues in AI-Generated Artworks [J]. Communication and Copyright, 2023, (11): 121–124.