Research on the Influencing Factors of Agricultural Products Trade Between China and Major Countries Along the "The Belt and Road" Initiative

Research Article
Open access

Research on the Influencing Factors of Agricultural Products Trade Between China and Major Countries Along the "The Belt and Road" Initiative

Anwaer Nazi 1*
  • 1 School of Finance, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing, China    
  • *corresponding author n3912037@gmail.com
LNEP Vol.97
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-137-2
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-138-9

Abstract

Against the backdrop of accelerated global climate governance and the deepening of the "dual carbon" goals, the carbon emissions trading system (ETS) has become a core policy tool for coordinating the contradiction between economic growth and carbon emission reduction. However, there is no systematic consensus on the driving path of ETS on corporate green innovation and its heterogeneous impact. Especially under the dual challenges of the institutional environment of emerging economies and the reconstruction of the global value chain, theoretical deepening and policy innovation are urgently needed. This paper uses a mixed research method to systematically explore the mechanism and boundary conditions of ETS on corporate green innovation, covering the development process of carbon emissions trading policies and the trend of corporate green technology innovation. It deeply analyzes the impact, mechanism, and heterogeneous impact of carbon emissions trading on corporate green innovation, aiming to optimize the operating mechanism of the carbon emissions trading market, thereby promoting the green transformation and sustainable development of enterprises, and providing a policy framework that is both efficient and fair for the construction of carbon markets in emerging economies. At the same time, it fills the gap in the existing literature on the dynamic interaction mechanism of "institution-market-enterprise".

Keywords:

Corporate green technology innovation, carbon emissions trading system, corporate carbon emission reduction

Nazi,A. (2025). Research on the Influencing Factors of Agricultural Products Trade Between China and Major Countries Along the "The Belt and Road" Initiative. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,97,64-70.
Export citation

References

[1]. World Bank. (2023). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[2]. Linde, P. C. V. D. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.

[3]. Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence From the European Carbon Market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173-191.

[4]. Johnstone, N., & Hascic, I. (2009). Environmental Policy Design and the Fragmentation of International Markets for Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 23(4), 18-19.

[5]. Hu, J., Huang, N., & Shen, H. (2020). Can Market Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Technological Innovation? A Natural Experiment Based on China's Carbon Emission Trading Mechanism. Financial Research, (1), 171-189.

[6]. Li, X. (2015). Review and Prospect of Green Innovation Related Research. Research and Development Management, 27(2), 1-11.

[7]. Teece, D. J. (2018). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 1-18.

[8]. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, J. (2014). Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Preservation of the Natural Environment. Organization Science, 25(1), 1-20.

[9]. Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do Carbon Emission Trading Schemes Stimulate Green Innovation in Enterprises? Evidence From China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744.

[10]. Wei, L., & Ren, L. (2021). Can Carbon Emission Trading Promote Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Based on the Perspective of Carbon Price. Lanzhou Journal, (7), 91-110.

[11]. Zhu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Yao, Y. (2025). Does the Carbon Emission Trading Policy Promote Green Dual Innovation of Enterprises? Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 46(1), 65-76.

[12]. Wang, D., & Yang, B. (2024). Research on the Driving Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading System on Green Technology Innovation of Emission-Controlled Enterprises: Based on Market Logic Perspective. Soft Science, 38(12), 71-78.

[13]. Mei, L., & Cui, W. (2023). Research on the Impact Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading System on Corporate Green Innovation. Industrial Economic Review, 14(4), 38-58.

[14]. Li, C., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2023). The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Test Based on Instrumental Variables and Triple Difference. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 44(5), 15-33.

[15]. Lan, G., Wu, R., & Li, Z. (2024). Carbon Emission Trading System and Enterprise Green Technology Innovation. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 44(11), 160-171+208.

[16]. Xiao, L., Chen, S., & Yuan, C. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Corporate Green Innovation From a Heterogeneous Perspective: Based on Green Patent Data of Listed Companies. Science and Technology Management Research, 43(2), 177-185.

Cite this article

Nazi,A. (2025). Research on the Influencing Factors of Agricultural Products Trade Between China and Major Countries Along the "The Belt and Road" Initiative. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,97,64-70.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceeding of ICGPSH 2025 Symposium: The Globalization of Connection: Language, Supply Chain, Tariff, and Trade Wars

ISBN：978-1-80590-137-2(Print) / 978-1-80590-138-9(Online)
Editor：Enrique Mallen, Canh Thien Dang
Conference website: https://2025.icgpsh.org/London.html
Conference date: 25 June 2025
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.97
ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. World Bank. (2023). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[2]. Linde, P. C. V. D. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.

[3]. Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016). Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence From the European Carbon Market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(1), 173-191.

[4]. Johnstone, N., & Hascic, I. (2009). Environmental Policy Design and the Fragmentation of International Markets for Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, 23(4), 18-19.

[5]. Hu, J., Huang, N., & Shen, H. (2020). Can Market Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Technological Innovation? A Natural Experiment Based on China's Carbon Emission Trading Mechanism. Financial Research, (1), 171-189.

[6]. Li, X. (2015). Review and Prospect of Green Innovation Related Research. Research and Development Management, 27(2), 1-11.

[7]. Teece, D. J. (2018). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 1-18.

[8]. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, J. (2014). Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Preservation of the Natural Environment. Organization Science, 25(1), 1-20.

[9]. Chen, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, F. (2021). Do Carbon Emission Trading Schemes Stimulate Green Innovation in Enterprises? Evidence From China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120744.

[10]. Wei, L., & Ren, L. (2021). Can Carbon Emission Trading Promote Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Based on the Perspective of Carbon Price. Lanzhou Journal, (7), 91-110.

[11]. Zhu, Y., Zhang, Q., & Yao, Y. (2025). Does the Carbon Emission Trading Policy Promote Green Dual Innovation of Enterprises? Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 46(1), 65-76.

[12]. Wang, D., & Yang, B. (2024). Research on the Driving Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading System on Green Technology Innovation of Emission-Controlled Enterprises: Based on Market Logic Perspective. Soft Science, 38(12), 71-78.

[13]. Mei, L., & Cui, W. (2023). Research on the Impact Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading System on Corporate Green Innovation. Industrial Economic Review, 14(4), 38-58.

[14]. Li, C., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2023). The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Test Based on Instrumental Variables and Triple Difference. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 44(5), 15-33.

[15]. Lan, G., Wu, R., & Li, Z. (2024). Carbon Emission Trading System and Enterprise Green Technology Innovation. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 44(11), 160-171+208.

[16]. Xiao, L., Chen, S., & Yuan, C. (2023). Analysis of the Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Corporate Green Innovation From a Heterogeneous Perspective: Based on Green Patent Data of Listed Companies. Science and Technology Management Research, 43(2), 177-185.

For authors
Guide for authors Policies for authors Aims and scope Subscription Open access policy
For editors
Policies for editors Editorial board
For reviewers
Policies for reviewers Privacy policy

Cookies are used by this site.
Copyright © 2024 EWA Publishing, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.