Research Article
Open access
Published on 1 March 2023
Download pdf
Zhao,J. (2023). Different Preferences for Emojis in the Aspect of Age. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,1142-1146.
Export citation

Different Preferences for Emojis in the Aspect of Age

Jinhan Zhao *,1,
  • 1 College of Foreign Languages, Xinjiang Normal University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022658

Abstract

It is well-established that emojis play an essential part when communicating with others online. This study investigates the different preferences of emojis among different age groups. The interview is done to support the investigation. Respondents are divided by age into two groups. (respondents aged from 10-30 and respondents aged from 31-50) They are asked to answer several questions which are designed based on the theory of conversational implicature. Respondents' answers are collected and analyzed. The result showed that there are differences in emoji preferences between age groups. The result suggests that there is a distinguished difference between young people and older people in the choice of emojis. Older people tend not to use emojis that convey negative emotions, and the younger people can feel the emojis' implications hidden in it through the context.

Keywords

ambiguity, emojis, preferences, age

[1]. L. Li, Y. Yang, Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication---a corpus-based study, Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2018, pp. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-z.

[2]. T.K. Koch, P. Romero, C. Stachl, Age and gender in language, emoji, and emoticon usage in instant messages, Published by Elsevier Ltd., Computers in Human Behavior 126, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106990.

[3]. S.C. Herring and A.R. Dainas, Receiver Interpretations of Emojis Functions: A Gender Perspective, 2018

[4]. J.Cui, Respecting the Old and Loving the Young: Emoji-Based Sarcasm Interpretation Between Younger and Older Adults, Frontiers in Psychology 13:897153, 2022, DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897153.

[5]. Zhou, B., and Gui, S. (2017). “WeChat and distant family intergenerational communication in China: A study of online content sharing on WeChat,” in New Media and Chinese Society. Communication, Culture and Change in Asia. Vol. 5. eds. 2017, DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-6710-5_11.

Cite this article

Zhao,J. (2023). Different Preferences for Emojis in the Aspect of Age. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,1142-1146.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-915371-09-6(Print) / 978-1-915371-10-2(Online)
Conference date: 4 August 2022
Editor:Abdullah Laghari, Nasir Mahmood
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.3
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).