Download pdf
Hermeneutical Weakening
- 1 Franklin & Marshall College
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Hermeneutical injustice is an epistemic injustice that happens when a person's experience cannot be well understood or articulated because of the problem with the collective hermeneutical resource -- a collection of concepts and words that we use to understand one's experience and to communicate with one another about it. Previously, Miranda Fricker and Rebecca Mason have suggested two types of hermeneutical injustice: Hermeneutical Gap and Hermeneutical Distortion. Fricker believes that hermeneutical injustice is a gap between hermeneutical resources, whereas Mason suggests the collective hermeneutical resource can also be distorted when the words and concepts that comprise it are inferentially related in ways that are invalid or inductively weak. However, in this paper, I identify a novel type of hermeneutical injustice that I call Hermeneutical Weakening. In a case of HW, hermeneutical injustice is neither caused by the collective hermeneutical resource being deficient nor it being distorted, but due to it being weakened. I define Hermeneutical Weakening as the loss of word significance when the lexical effect of the word is weakened due to overuse. I then differentiate hermeneutical weakening from both hermeneutical gap and distortion. In particular, I analyze the subtle differences between weakening and distortion and argue the lexical effect can also be weakened through non-literal uses of words when the literal standard meaning of words to which distortion tied is suspended. Finally, I explain the generation of hermeneutical weakening and how it is also a form of oppression of the marginalized group generated systematically under the social system.
Keywords
hermeneutical injustice, lexical effect, overuse
[1]. Fricker, Miranda. "Hermeneutical injustice." Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford Scholarship Online (2007): 147-175.
[2]. Mason, Rebecca. "Hermeneutical Injustice." The Routledge Handbook of Social and Political Philosophy of Language. Routledge, 2021. 247-258.
[3]. Cappelen, Herman, and Josh Dever. Bad language. Oxford University Press, 2019.
[4]. Ilic, Marie, et al. "Belittled, avoided, ignored, denied: Assessing forms and consequences of stigma experiences of people with mental illness." Basic and Applied Social Psychology 35.1 (2013): 31-40.
[5]. Medina, José. "Hermeneutical injustice and polyphonic contextualism: Social silences and shared hermeneutical responsibilities." Social Epistemology 26.2 (2012): 201-220.
[6]. Hirji, Sukaina. "Oppressive double binds." Ethics 131.4 (2021): 643-669.
Cite this article
Zhang,Z. (2023). Hermeneutical Weakening. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,10,14-23.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).