Download pdf
Stratified Small Class Teaching and Educational Equity
- 1 Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Foreign Languages, No,29, Thirteenth Street, TEDA, Tianjin, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the relationship between performance-based classroom teaching and educational equity, with experimental data collected primarily through questionnaires, as it has been and continues to be a popular teaching method in China today. Through surveys and summaries, the stratified small class teaching does undermine educational equity, so in future we should avoid harm and be more rigorous in our use of stratified small class teaching.
Keywords
psychological, stratified small class teaching, education, equity
[1]. Dingxian, (1994), ‘A US study of the effects of ability-based classroom teaching’, in China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House.
[2]. Shuzeng, (2014), ‘On equity issues in the practice of merit-based class allocation in general secondary schools’, in Beijing Normal University’s Cultural and Educational Materials.
[3]. Wangyong, (2016), ‘Reflections on tiered teaching in a project-based teaching model’, in Journal of Higher Education.
[4]. GuYongming, (2010), ‘Experimenting with the impact of dividing key classes on students' English learning’, in China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House.
[5]. JiangChengjing, (2018), ‘A study of tiered education at the junior secondary level’, in Central China Normal University.
[6]. ChenZhuru, (1996), ‘On working with poor students in nine-year compulsory education’, in Jian Teachers College.
[7]. LiYihong, (2002), ‘Analysis of the causes and countermeasures of the gap between the performance of arts and science mathematics in high school classes’, in Curriculum Materials Teaching Research.
[8]. Wangmei, (2013), ‘The impact of focused class placement on high school students' learning in mathematics’, in Academic Theory.
Cite this article
Li,L. (2023). Stratified Small Class Teaching and Educational Equity. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,2,791-797.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part I
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).