An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Divorce Cooling-off Period on Divorce Rate in Chinese Context

Research Article
Open access

An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Divorce Cooling-off Period on Divorce Rate in Chinese Context

Yujia Su 1*
  • 1 School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an,710000, China    
  • *corresponding author 310908@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
Published on 1 March 2023 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022605
LNEP Vol.3
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-915371-09-6
ISBN (Online): 978-1-915371-10-2

Abstract

In 2020, the number of divorcees in China was as high as 3.733 million. The high divorce rate has become an unavoidable problem in today's society. Therefore, China officially implemented a cooling-off period policy for divorce in 2021, aiming to reduce the occurrence of impulsive divorces and lower the divorce rate by Increase the consideration time of the parties. Since its implementation, the policy has sparked heated discussions about its ethical and practical effects in China. This study focuses on the practical effects of divorce cooling-off period, and uses Ordinary Least Square (OLS) mixed multiple linear regression and other empirical tools to test the impact of divorce cooling-off period on divorce rate. The results show that the implementation of divorce cooling-off period has a significant effect on the decrease of divorce rate, however, the decrease regression coefficient is not large. It can be shown that in the context of China, the divorce cooling-off period plays a certain role and can be further implemented, but at the same time, more attention should be paid to its improvement. Subjective initiative should be exerted and external mediation mechanism should be added in the cooling-off period in order to achieve better results.

Keywords:

Su,Y. (2023). An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Divorce Cooling-off Period on Divorce Rate in Chinese Context. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,583-590.
Export citation

References

[1]. Zhiyong M 2022 The formation logic of "divorce cooling-off period" system and its reflection Jurist 03 14-28

[2]. Yonggui Z 2022 The implementation and improvement of divorce cooling-off period system Legal Review 11 7-10

[3]. Dyck C W 2009 The Divorce of Reason and Experience: Kant's Paralogisms of Pure Reason in Context Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(2) 249-275

[4]. Guangzong M 2019 What social problems are reflected behind the increase of divorce rate -- improving the ability of the new generation of Chinese people to "love"? People's Forum 23 62-64.

[5]. Becker G S, Landes, E. M. and Michael, R. T. 1977 An Analysis of Marital instability Journal of Political Economy 85(6) 1141-1187

[6]. Peters H E 1986 Marriage and divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting The American Economic Review 76(3) 437-454

[7]. Hetherington E M, Cox, M. and Cox, R. 1976 Divorced Fathers Family Coordinator 417-428.

[8]. Yinan M 2020 Divorce cooling-off period is a restriction and constraint on rash divorce Collection of Women's Studies 04 103-107

[9]. Haiyuan Z 2022 Operation mechanism optimization of divorce cooling-off period from the perspective of risk prevention Journal of Zhejiang University 02 57-67

[10]. Ru W 2022 Research on the improvement of divorce cooling-off period system Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology 01 48-53

[11]. Lee J 2013 The impact of a mandatory cooling-off period on divorce The Journal of Law and Economics 56(1) 227-243

[12]. Li Z 2022 Application principle of divorce cooling-off period clause in Civil Code: connotation and extension Research on the Rule of Law 01 36-44.

Cite this article

Su,Y. (2023). An Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Divorce Cooling-off Period on Divorce Rate in Chinese Context. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,583-590.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II

ISBN：978-1-915371-09-6(Print) / 978-1-915371-10-2(Online)
Editor：Abdullah Laghari, Nasir Mahmood
Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
Conference date: 4 August 2022
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.3
ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Zhiyong M 2022 The formation logic of "divorce cooling-off period" system and its reflection Jurist 03 14-28

[2]. Yonggui Z 2022 The implementation and improvement of divorce cooling-off period system Legal Review 11 7-10

[3]. Dyck C W 2009 The Divorce of Reason and Experience: Kant's Paralogisms of Pure Reason in Context Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(2) 249-275

[4]. Guangzong M 2019 What social problems are reflected behind the increase of divorce rate -- improving the ability of the new generation of Chinese people to "love"? People's Forum 23 62-64.

[5]. Becker G S, Landes, E. M. and Michael, R. T. 1977 An Analysis of Marital instability Journal of Political Economy 85(6) 1141-1187

[6]. Peters H E 1986 Marriage and divorce: Informational Constraints and Private Contracting The American Economic Review 76(3) 437-454

[7]. Hetherington E M, Cox, M. and Cox, R. 1976 Divorced Fathers Family Coordinator 417-428.

[8]. Yinan M 2020 Divorce cooling-off period is a restriction and constraint on rash divorce Collection of Women's Studies 04 103-107

[9]. Haiyuan Z 2022 Operation mechanism optimization of divorce cooling-off period from the perspective of risk prevention Journal of Zhejiang University 02 57-67

[10]. Ru W 2022 Research on the improvement of divorce cooling-off period system Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology 01 48-53

[11]. Lee J 2013 The impact of a mandatory cooling-off period on divorce The Journal of Law and Economics 56(1) 227-243

[12]. Li Z 2022 Application principle of divorce cooling-off period clause in Civil Code: connotation and extension Research on the Rule of Law 01 36-44.

For authors
Guide for authors Policies for authors Aims and scope Subscription Open access policy
For editors
Policies for editors Editorial board
For reviewers
Policies for reviewers Privacy policy

Cookies are used by this site.
Copyright © 2024 EWA Publishing, its licensors, and contributors. All rights reserved, including text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.