Download pdf
Gaokao: A Fate-changing Contest or the Myth of Meritocracy
- 1 Harvard University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This analytical paper examined the role of Gaokao, China’s college entrance examination, in reproducing an unequal and oppressive status quo. Gaokao has received mounting criticism for requiring so much rote learning and discounting individual creativity. Though there is also heated debate on the fairness of this high-stake test, Gaokao is widely believed by many Chinese students and parents as the relatively fair approach for the nation to select talents. The research brings new insights into this topic by analyzing it with Pierre Bourdieu’s framework of types of capitals. It elucidates why Gaokao offers a false promise of a socially equalizing effect. Moreover, through the analysis made by this study, it gives awareness to society on how failure to realize the inequality in Gaokao will legitimates the process of social segregation and thus calls for exploring possible visions of better selection mechanisms. The paper begins by exploring the history of Gaokao and how Gaokao became the embodiment of a meritocratic ideal. Following this, this paper briefly discusses how Gaokao failed to promote an equitable education system as commonly believed. The last section highlights the harmful effects of the failure to realize the inequality and oppression inherent in Gaokao.
Keywords
educational inequality, Gaokao, standardized test
[1]. Gu, M. The Gaokao: History, Reform, and Rising International Significance of China’s National College Entrance Examination, https://wenr.wes.org/2016/05/the-gaokao-history-reform-and-international-significance-of-chinas-national-college-entrance-examination, 2016
[2]. The China Project. https://thechinaproject.com/2019/08/14/education-in-china-how-the-gaokao-exam-shapes-chinese-students-lives-and-futures/, 2019
[3]. Krauze, T., Slomczynski, K. M. How Far to Meritocracy? Empirical Tests of a Controversial Thesis. Social Forces, 1985, 623-642.
[4]. Young, M. D. The Rise of the Meritocracy. London: Thomas and Hudson, 1958.
[5]. Woodside, A. Lost Modernities: China, Vietnam, Korea, and the Hazards of World History. Cambridge: The Harvard Press, 2006.
[6]. Elman, B. Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.
[7]. Têng, S.-y. Chinese Influence on the Western Examination System: I. Introduction. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 1943, 267-312.
[8]. Goldthorpe, J. H.& Jackson, M. Intergenerational class mobility in contemporary Britain: political concerns and empirical findings. The British Journal of Sociology, 2007, 525-546.
[9]. Spence, J. The Reith Lectures. Retrieved from BBC Radio: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00bvz8s, 2008, June 7.
[10]. Howlett, Z. A Fateful Rite of Passage: The Gaokao and the Myth of Meritocracy. In Z. Howlett, Meritocracy and Its Discontents: Anxiety and the National College Entrance Exam in China. Cornell University Press, 2021, 1-40.
[11]. Liu, H. & Wu, Q. Consequences of college entrance exams in China and the reform challenges. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2006, Vol. 3 Issue 1, 7-21.
[12]. Bourdieu, P. The Forms of Capital, 1986.
[13]. Liu, Y., & Fang, Y. Basic education reform in China: globalization with Chinese characteristics. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2009, 407-412.
[14]. Wang, D. The Clash of Cultures in Rural Classrooms. In D. Wang, The Demoralization of Teachers: Crisis in a Rural School. Lexington Books, 2013.
[15]. Liu, Q.& Yang, Y. Online classes exacerbate China’s rural-urban education gap, https://www.ft.com/content/18455abf-d683-48f1-a6ed-b97bf3fc162e, 2020.
[16]. Pak, J. Is China’s multibillion-dollar tutoring industry coming to an end? Retrieved from MarketPlace: https://www.marketplace.org/2021/08/16/is-chinas-multibillion-dollar-tutoring-industry-coming-to-an-end/, 2021, August 16.
[17]. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Households' Income and Consumption Expenditure in the First Half Year of 2021. Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn/enGliSH/PressRelease/202107/t20210716_1819567.html, 2021, July 6.
[18]. Liu, Y. Meritocracy and the Gaokao: a survey study of higher education selection and socio-economic participation in East China. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2013, 868-887.
[19]. Xin, X. My Future, My Family, My Freedom: Meanings of Schooling for Poor, Rural Chinese Youth. Harvard Educational Reviews, 2018, 81-136.
Cite this article
Hu,B. (2023). Gaokao: A Fate-changing Contest or the Myth of Meritocracy. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,12,209-214.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).