Download pdf
Antisocial Personality Disorder: Labeling and Stigmatization from the Perspectives of Society, Judiciary, and Clinical Practices
- 1 University of California, Irvine
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of recent research concerning the impact of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) labeling and stigmatization within different environments. Mixed findings were found in all three environmental settings, revealing that an ASPD diagnosis (or a psychopathy label particularly in forensic settings) could result in either positive or negative outcomes. In social settings: inconsistent public responses to ASPD population were found which might suggest a situational effect in regard to ASPD symptoms, and further studies should be conducted on the subject matter. In addition, media portrayals of the ASPD population mistakenly confused ASPD individuals with psychopaths. It would then be important to study to what extent mass media contributed to ASPD stigmatization, in which fear as one contributing component was discussed. In forensic settings: findings supported the presence of ASPD stigmatization. However, considering the ambiguous boundary between ASPD and psychopath within the judicial system, more studies would be needed to investigate whether two labels triggered different levels of stigma and prejudice so as to ensure fairness and justice. In medical settings: there were mental health professionals advocating for replacing stigmatizing labels with less pejorative terms, yet other practitioners reinforced ASPD labeling and stigmatization through refusing treatment delivery that further led to discrimination and discouragement of the ASPD population. Future studies should focus more on finding better guidelines and modifications for the practical field in order to destigmatize or avoid labeling when treating ASPD populations.
Keywords
antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), psychopath, label, stigma
[1]. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
[2]. Ahmedani B. K. (2011). Mental Health Stigma: Society, Individuals, and the Profession. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 8(2), 41–416.
[3]. Yang, L. H., Link, B. G., Ben-David, S., Gill, K. E., Girgis, R. R., Brucato, G., Wonpat-Borja, A. J., & Corcoran, C. (2015). Stigma related to labels and symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 168(1–2), 9–15.
[4]. Sorg, A. E. (2019). The Impact of Medicalization on Individuals Labeled with Antisocial Personality Disorder. Master dissertation. Toledo. The University of Toledo
[5]. Hazell, C. M., Berry, C., Bogen-Johnston, L., & Banerjee, M. (2022). Creating a hierarchy of mental health stigma: testing the effect of psychiatric diagnosis on stigma. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 8(5).
[6]. O’Connor, C., & Murphy, L. (2021). Effects of diagnostic disclosure and varying diagnostic terminology on social attitudes to personality disorder: An experimental vignette study. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
[7]. Lopera-Mármol, M., Jiménez-Morales, M., & Jiménez-Morales, M. (2022a). Aesthetic Representation of Antisocial Personality Disorder in British Coming-of-Age TV Series. Social Sciences, 11(3), 133.
[8]. Lopera-Mármol, M., Jiménez-Morales, M., & Jiménez-Morales, M. (2022b). Communicating Health: Depictions of Depression, Antisocial Personality Disorder, and Autism without Intellectual Disability in British and U.S. Coming-of-Age TV Series. Humanities, 11(3), 66.
[9]. Felthous, A., & Saß, H. (2020). The Wiley International Handbook on Psychopathic Disorders and the Law. Wiley-Blackwell.
[10]. Larsen, R. (2019). Psychopathy Treatment and the Stigma of Yesterday’s Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 29(3), 243–272.
[11]. Truong, T. N., Kelley, S. E., & Edens, J. F. (2021). Does Psychopathy Influence Juror Decision-Making in Capital Murder Trials? “The Devil is in the (Methodological) Details.” Criminal Justice and Behavior.
[12]. Kelley, S. E., Edens, J. F., Mowle, E. N., Penson, B. N., & Rulseh, A. (2019). Dangerous, depraved, and death-worthy: A meta-analysis of the correlates of perceived psychopathy in jury simulation studies. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 627–643.
[13]. Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(5), 603–625.
[14]. Berryessa, C. M., & Wohlstetter, B. (2019). The psychopathic “label” and effects on punishment outcomes: A meta-analysis. Law And Human Behavior, 43(1), 9–25.
[15]. Prasad, A. H., & Kimonis, E. R. (2018). Effects of the “Limited Prosocial Emotions” Specifier for Conduct Disorder on Juror Perceptions of Juvenile Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(10), 1547–1564.
[16]. Cohen, B. M., Öngür, D., Babb, S. M., & Harris, P. Q. (2022). Diagnostic terms psychiatrists prefer to use for common psychotic and personality disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 155, 226–231.
[17]. World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.).
[18]. Widiger, T. A., & Widiger, T. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Personality Disorders. Oxford University Press.
Cite this article
Li,X. (2023). Antisocial Personality Disorder: Labeling and Stigmatization from the Perspectives of Society, Judiciary, and Clinical Practices. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,13,31-38.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).