Approaching the European Union Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Through the Lens of the Principle of Good Faith

Ruichen Zhang; Qianyun Bi

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/23/20230358

Research Article

Open access

Published on 20 November 2023

Download pdf

Zhang,R.;Bi,Q. (2023). Approaching the European Union Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Through the Lens of the Principle of Good Faith. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,23,33-40.

Export citation

Approaching the European Union Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Through the Lens of the Principle of Good Faith

Ruichen Zhang *^,1, Qianyun Bi ²

¹ Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
² Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/23/20230358

Abstract

The article aims to delve into the nuanced interpretation of the principle of good faith within the domain of unfair terms prevalent in consumer contracts. This principle has proven pivotal in appraising the fairness of terms, serving as a benchmark. Its multifaceted application across legal domains necessitates a precise explication of its contextual significance. Emphasizing the imperative to delineate the exact connotation of the good faith principle in the judicial realm of consumer safeguarding, the article subsequently elucidates this proposition through a meticulous analysis of the Directive and its corresponding legal cases. However, the initial analysis underscores the Directive’s somewhat ambiguous delineation of the good faith principle. This prompts an inquiry into whether such ambiguity hampers the comprehensive evolution of this principle within the broader context of EU private law. Consequently, the subsequent discourse endeavors to rationalize this aspect within a redefined comprehension of the jurisprudential underpinning of the Directive.

Keywords

good faith principle, unfair terms, consumer contract, consumer protection

View pdf

References

[1]. Whittaker, S. , Zimmermann, R. (2000). Good faith in European contract law: surveying the legal landscape, 7-62.

[2]. Wieacker, F. (1956). Zur rechtstheoretischen Präzisierung des §242. Tübingen.

[3]. Brownsword, R., Howells, G. and Wilhelmsson, T. (n.d.). The EC Unfair Contract Terms Directive and Welfarism. In Welfarism in Contract Law, 279.

[4]. Collins, H. (1994). Good Faith in European Contract Law. 14 O.J.L.S. 229, 249 et seq.

[5]. Kessler, F. (1943). Contracts of Adhesion--Some thoughts about Freedom of Contract. 43 Columbia Law Review, 629, 632, 640.

[6]. Slawson, W. (1971). Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power. 84 Harvard Law Review, 529, 530.

[7]. Ramsay, I. (2007). Consumer Law and Policy: Text and Materials on Regulating Consumer Markets. Hart Publishing.

[8]. Howells, G., Ramsay, I., Wilhelmsson, T. and Kraft, D. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Research on International Consumer Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

[9]. Mullainathan, S., Thaler, R. H. (2000). Behavioral Economics. MIT Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 00-27. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=245828.

[10]. Howells, G. (2005). The Potential and Limits of Consumer Empowerment by Information. 32 J.L. & Soc'y, 349-370.

[11]. Goldberg, V. P. (1974). Institutional Change and the Quasi-Invisible Hand. 17 Journal of Law and Economics, 461, 484.

[12]. Kötz, H., Flessner, A. (1997). European Contract Law. Clarendon Press, 138.

[13]. Inequality of bargaining power versus market for lemons: legal paradigm change and the Court of Justice’s jurisprudence on Directive 93/13 on unfair contract terms, E.L. Rev. 2008, 33(3), 336-358.

Cite this article

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

Conference website: https://www.icgpsh.org/

ISBN：978-1-83558-125-4(Print) / 978-1-83558-126-1(Online)

Conference date: 13 October 2023

Editor：Javier Cifuentes-Faura, Enrique Mallen

Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Volume number: Vol.23

ISSN：2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).