
Exploring the Political Thoughts and Social Influences of Schmitt and Foucault
- 1 Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
- 2 Qinghua Zhiqing High School International
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This article mainly discusses the ideas of Schmitt and Foucault and their impact on society. Schmitt and Foucault are both famous thinkers, and their own ideas are very famous. Exploring the differences between the political thoughts of Schmitt and Foucault would be beneficial for scholars to understand their ideas and better know the reasons for the differences. Schmitt used to be a Nazi, and his ideas were sometimes misunderstood. But this does not affect his and Foucault's ideas, which have led to many changes and progress in society. The first part discusses their respective introductions and their thoughts. The second part describes their differences, including differences in views of sovereign roles, the relationship between power and knowledge, different social backgrounds and Political ideologies, and changes to society. The third part is a discussion about their ideas. The final section analyzes the conclusions of these individuals, their views on rights, and concludes which side is better.
Keywords
political thoughts, social influences, Schmitt, Foucault
[1]. Morgan, J. (2020) The Disciplines of Power, the Weight of Love, and the Politics of Necessity: Reading Augustine with Foucault. Heythrop Journal, 61(1), 15–23. https://doi-org-s.elink.xjtlu.edu.cn:443/10.1111/heyj.13411
[2]. Parker, I. . (2008) Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. Psychoanalysis,Culture & Society.
[3]. Freeman, Samuel. (2019). Original Position. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/original-position/>.
[4]. McKenzie Wark.(2015) On Wendy Brown, URL=<https://publicseminar.org/2015/08/on-wendy-brown/ >
[5]. Palmer T. (2016) Carl Schmitt: The Philosopher of Conflict”, UPL= https://intellectualtakeout.org/2016/11/carl-schmitt-the-philosopher-of-conflict/
[6]. G. Palmer T.(2016) Carl Schmitt: The Philosopher of Conflict Who Inspired Both the Left and the Right. URL= <https://fee.org/articles/carl-schmitt-the-philosopher-of-conflict-who-inspired-both-the-left-and-the-right/#:~:text=Schmitt’s%20thorough%20and%20uncompromising%20rejection%20of%20classical%20liberalism,of%20political%20thought%2C%20on%20both%20“left”%20and%20“right.”>
[7]. Faubion J. (2023) Michel Foucault. UPL= <https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michel-Foucault>
[8]. Libin X and Patapan H. (2020) Schmitt Fever: The use and abuse of Carl Schmitt in contemporary China”. UPL= <https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/18/1/130/5841486?login=false>
[9]. Mambrol N. (2016) Foucault’s Influence on Postmodern Thought. URL= <https://literariness.org/2016/04/04/foucaults-influence-on-postmodern-thought/>
[10]. Gutting, Gary and Johanna Oksala. Michel Foucault. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/foucault/>.
[11]. Vinx, Lars. (2019) Carl Schmitt. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/schmitt/>.
Cite this article
Chen,S.;Zhang,J. (2023). Exploring the Political Thoughts and Social Influences of Schmitt and Foucault. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,25,18-26.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).