
Interests and Responsibilities: Multiple Subjects and Their Normative Settings in Engineering Ethics
- 1 No.2 High School of East China Normal University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The complexity of modern engineering makes engineering increasingly become a collective activity, and the multiple subjects involved are constantly being highlighted. When engineering risks occur, it is often impossible to attribute all the responsibilities to a specific person, especially when researching to maximize profits. Engineering activities face more significant risks and challenges. Engineering ethics research addresses the ethical challenges and dilemmas engineers encounter in their professional practice. However, existing research methods and models may not adequately capture the diversity and interdependence of the actors and factors involved in engineering projects. For this reason, it is urgent for engineering ethics research to build a research and decision-making model that can integrate multiple subjects and multiple disciplines to solve ethical problems in specific engineering practices. By doing so, this paper hopes to promote ethical awareness and responsibility among engineers and other stakeholders and to ensure that engineering activities can genuinely serve the common good of humanity.
Keywords
engineering ethics, multiple subjects, interest, responsibility
[1]. Bocong Li. (2006). “Several Issues About the Object and Scope of Engineering Ethics - Three Discussions on Several Issues About Engineering Ethics.” Ethics Research, 6: 25.
[2]. Philip, Thomas M. et al. (2018). “Why Ideology Matters for Learning: A Case of Ideological Convergence in an Engineering Ethics Classroom Discussion on Drone Warfare.” Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27: 183 - 223.
[3]. Martin, Diana Adela et al. (2021). “A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 27.
[4]. Smith, Nicole M. et al. (2021). “Enhancing Engineering Ethics: Role Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 27.
[5]. Nair, Indira and William M. Bulleit. (2020). “Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 26: 65-87.
[6]. Marcu, Daniela et al. (2020). “Software Engineering Ethics.” Postmodern Openings.
[7]. Wong, Pak-Hang. (2020). “Global Engineering Ethics.” The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering.
[8]. Clancy, Rockwell F. (2020). “The Development of a Case-Based Course on Global Engineering Ethics in China.” International Journal of Ethics Education, 6: 51 - 73.
[9]. Hengli Zhang. (2015). “The Historical Evolution of the American Engineering Profession.” China Technology Forum, 2015 (06): 22-23.
[10]. Borenstein, Jason et al. (2019). “Self-Driving Cars and Engineering Ethics: The Need for a System Level Analysis.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 25: 383-398.
Cite this article
Gordon,M.R. (2023). Interests and Responsibilities: Multiple Subjects and Their Normative Settings in Engineering Ethics. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,30,65-70.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).