Download pdf
Ethical and Moral Issues Raised by Replicating the Moral Model Personality and Creating the Perfect Simulator
- 1 Changzhou Senior High School of Jiangsu Province
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The reproduction of moral role models and the development of flawless moral robots both raise a number of ethical and moral questions, which are investigated in this study. To begin, the research investigates the social reality of the problem by focusing on the question of whether or not moral role models should be reproduced through technological means. After that, this study developed an ethical conundrum based on it and published it on social media in order to get people's reactions to it. After that, the ethical and theoretical difficulties that may come from duplicating a flawless moral subject into a robot were further investigated through the feedback and messages from the public. These issues included the robot's moral judgement, rights, societal acceptance, awareness, potential risks, and abuse. This underscores the intricate relationship that exists between technology and ethics, as well as the necessity for a synthesis of ethical, legal, social, and cultural issues, as well as broad discussion and interdisciplinary collaboration, in order to handle the complex challenges that are involved.
Keywords
moral model, simulater, social reality
[1]. Matthies, E., Klöckner, C. A., & Preißner, C. L. (2006). Applying a modified moral decision making model to change habitual car use: how can commitment be effective?. Applied Psychology, 55(1), 91-106.
[2]. Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343.
[3]. Hofmann, E., Hoelzl, E., & Kirchler, E. (2008). A comparison of models describing the impact of moral decision making on investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 171-187.
[4]. McConnell, M. W. (1996). The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's Moral Reading of the Constitution. Fordham L. Rev., 65, 1269.
[5]. McConnell, D., Llewellyn, G., & Ferronato, L. (2006). Context‐contingent decision‐making in child protection practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(3), 230-239.
[6]. Endacott, R., Scholes, J., Cooper, S., McConnell-Henry, T., Porter, J., Missen, K., ... & Champion, R. (2012). Identifying patient deterioration: using simulation and reflective interviewing to examine decision making skills in a rural hospital. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(6), 710-717.
[7]. McConnell, A. (2016). A public policy approach to understanding the nature and causes of foreign policy failure. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 667-684.
[8]. McConnell, M. W. (1997). The Right to Die and the Jurisprudence of Tradition. Utah L. Rev., 665.
[9]. McCabe, D. L., Dukerich, J. M., & Dutton, J. (1993). Values and moral dilemmas: A cross-cultural comparison. Business Ethics Quarterly, 117-130.
[10]. Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). “Intermediate” concepts and the connection to moral education. Educational psychology review, 11, 343-360.
[11]. Van Gils, S., Hogg, M. A., Van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, D. (2017). When organizational identification elicits moral decision-making: A matter of the right climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 142, 155-168.
Cite this article
Tan,Z. (2023). Ethical and Moral Issues Raised by Replicating the Moral Model Personality and Creating the Perfect Simulator. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,31,91-96.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).