1. Introduction
In 2023, the "Opinions on Promoting the High-Quality Development of Inclusive Finance" was issued by the State Council of China, integrating inclusive finance with green, low-carbon development, particularly evident in the construction sector as green site construction. From initial planning to project management, and further to construction and equipment manufacturing, the extensive application of digitized and intelligent technologies has reduced carbon emissions. In this context, centrally-owned enterprises such as China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC), China Energy Engineering Corporation (CEEC), and China Railway Construction Corporation Limited (CRCC) have emerged as industry leaders, spearheading the intelligent development in China's construction sector. In recent years, with the integration of digital technology, the economy and society have been propelled forward, while the new model of digital financial services in the banking sector has furthered the development of inclusive digital finance. Centrally-owned enterprises recognized the significance of Internet Plus and new business models in the internet finance sector early on, benefiting from the background of state-owned enterprises. They took the lead and actively promoted innovative transformation within the industry.
The rise of inclusive digital finance is not only a trend in China but also globally, disrupting operational models across various industries, including construction. However, there are certain differences in research methodologies and focal points in assessing the development of digital inclusive finance domestically and internationally. Foreign research institutions and scholars usually introduce digital indicators based on existing inclusive finance indices to assess the digital inclusive finance status of different countries. For instance, Indian economist Sarma (2012) employed linear efficiency functions and Euclidean distance methods, measuring the inclusive finance situations of various countries based on indicators such as bank coverage, accessibility to financial services, and usage conditions. Lyman and Lauer (2015) put forward core indicators for digital inclusive finance, including digital transaction platforms, digital infrastructure operators, and digital tools. In contrast, domestic research focuses more on exploring the demand situation for digital inclusive finance, constructing a multi-dimensional inclusive finance index system comprising indicators such as accessibility to financial services, usage conditions, and service quality. For example, Jiao Jinpu et al. (2015) studied non-banking financial services, establishing a comprehensive indicator system considering multiple aspects. In 2020, the G20 meeting passed the "G20 High-Level Principles for Digital Inclusive Finance," widely acknowledging the unique role of digital technology in promoting inclusive finance. Guo Feng et al. (2020) assessed the development of digital inclusive finance by constructing the "Peking University Digital Inclusive Finance Index" from various dimensions such as the breadth of digital financial coverage, depth of usage, and level of inclusivity in financial digitization.
Research indicates a significant causal relationship between the digital economy and enterprise innovation. Hu Shan et al. (2022) found that the digital economy fosters innovation within enterprises, providing critical impetus for breakthrough innovations. Meanwhile, Wang Gang et al. (2023) suggest that inclusive digital finance aids in resolving financing issues, reducing financing costs, and thereby driving technological innovation among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological advancements have spurred the demand for innovation within enterprises, aligning with the transformation and upgrade requirements of China's financial system. Enterprises should actively seek policy support, drive the development of digital infrastructure, and promote the deepening of the digital financial system. Against the backdrop of continual technological progress, the demand for innovation within enterprises has steadily increased, complementing the demands of China's financial system transformation and upgrade, compelling enterprises to actively respond. In this context, enterprises should leverage their inherent innovative potential, enhance competitiveness, strive for policy support, drive the development of digital infrastructure, and facilitate the deepening of the digital financial system. This viewpoint finds support from Ming Chengzhi (2023), advocating those enterprises actively pursue policy support for inclusive digital finance, promote the construction of digital infrastructure, and facilitate the deepening of the digital financial system. These developments not only guide the direction of enterprise innovation but also provide valuable experiences for the construction of China's digital financial system.
2. Sample and Data Analysis
2.1. Sample Selection and Data Source
Considering data availability, data from the period 2012 to 2021 for six central enterprises within China's top 500 engineering and construction companies, as highlighted in the 2023 "Fortune" report, were selected. These include China National Chemical Engineering, China Railway Construction Corporation Limited, China Railway Group Limited, China State Construction Engineering Corporation, China Energy Engineering Corporation, and China Communications Construction Company. Specifically, the Digital Inclusive Finance Index was obtained from Peking University for the mentioned period. Enterprise-related variables were sourced from the Wind and CSMAR databases, and truncation was applied to the sample.
2.2. Variable Definitions
In order to more reasonably define corporate innovation, this paper considers the explained variables from the perspectives of both innovation input and output, enriching the connotation of innovation. The innovation input draws from studies by Adhikarti (2016), Pan Yue et al. (2015), while innovation output is referenced from the literature of Zheng Manni et al. (2016), employing the entropy weight method to calculate the comprehensive score of innovation. The explanatory variable, Digital Inclusive Finance, is defined based on Peking University's Digital Inclusive Finance Index, encompassing breadth of coverage, depth of usage, and level of digitization. The mediating variables, referring to SA in Xiang Dong et al. (2023), define financing constraints. Control variables include enterprise scale, asset-liability ratio, net profit on total assets, return on equity, proportion of independent directors, and Tobin's Q ratio. Specific definitions of variables can be found in Table 1.
Table 1. Definition of Key Variables
RD1 |
Proportion of annual R&D expenditure to total assets of the company |
RD2 |
Proportion of annual R&D expenditure to operating income of the company |
Patent1 |
Total number of applications for invention patents, utility models, and design patents, plus the natural logarithm of 1 |
Patent2 |
Total number of applications for invention patents, utility models, and design patents, plus the natural logarithm of 1, with weights of 3:2:1 for the three types of patents |
Innovation |
Comprehensive score calculated using the entropy weight method for RD and Patent |
Index |
Beijing University's Digital Inclusive Finance Index |
Breadth |
|
Depth |
|
Digitial |
|
SA |
SA=-0.737*Size+0.043*Size^2-0.040*Age |
Size |
Natural logarithm of total annual assets |
Lev |
Year-end total liabilities divided by year-end total assets |
Roa |
Net profit divided by average total assets |
Roe |
Net profit divided by average owner's equity |
Indep |
Net profit divided by average owner's equity |
TobinQ |
(Market value of outstanding shares + Number of non-tradable shares * Net asset value per share + Book value of liabilities) divided by total assets |
3. Empirical Analysis
3.1. Correlation Analysis
This paper conducted Pearson correlation tests on variables. The conclusions drawn from Table 2 are as follows: Firstly, the correlation coefficient between the Digital Inclusive Finance Index and the six companies is positively 0.855, indicating that with a 99% probability, digital inclusive finance has a positive impact on corporate innovation. Secondly, the correlation coefficient between the Digital Inclusive Finance Index and the financing constraints of these six sampled companies is negatively 0.892, suggesting that with a 99% probability, digital inclusive finance alleviates financing constraints for enterprises. Lastly, the correlation coefficient between financing constraints and enterprise innovation is negatively 0.765, indicating that with a 99% probability, financing constraints hinder enterprise innovation activities.
Table 2.Correlation Analysis
Innovation |
Index |
SA |
Size |
Lev |
Roa |
Roe |
Indep |
TobinQ |
|
Innovation |
1 |
||||||||
Index |
0.855*** |
1 |
|||||||
SA |
-0.765*** |
-0.892*** |
1 |
||||||
Size |
0.340*** |
0.585*** |
0.497*** |
1 |
|||||
Lev |
-0.489*** |
-0.431*** |
0.386*** |
0.377*** |
1 |
||||
Roa |
-0.258** |
-0.254* |
0.310** |
-0.505*** |
-0.408*** |
1 |
|||
Roe |
-0.631*** |
-0.554*** |
0.575*** |
-0.291** |
0.208 |
0.787*** |
1 |
||
Indep |
-0.380*** |
-0.372*** |
0.312** |
-0.408*** |
-0.101 |
0.442*** |
0.464*** |
1 |
|
TobinQ |
-0.440*** |
-0.610*** |
0.495*** |
-0.696*** |
0.023 |
0.294** |
0.285** |
0.256** |
1 |
t-statistics in parentheses*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
3.2. Regression Analysis
This paper refers to the approach of Wang Qianying et al. (2016), using the bootstrap Hausman test to examine the selection between using the random effects model or the fixed effects model, and the test results are presented in Table 3.
Table 3.bootstrap Hausman test
F |
Prob > F |
|
bootstrap Hausman test |
151.71 |
0.00 |
From the results, it is evident that the model passes the bootstrap Hausman test; therefore, this paper should use the fixed effects model.
This paper, referencing Li Rongjin et al.'s study (2023), employs a bidirectional fixed effects model considering time and industry, constructing Model (1). In this model, enterprise innovation and the inclusive finance index serve as explanatory variables, measuring the overall effect of digital inclusive finance on innovation within construction enterprises. If positive, it indicates that the development of digital inclusive finance has a positive impact on construction enterprises. Time effects are represented as control variables.
\( Inovation_{it}=cons+∂_{1}Index_{it}+∂_{2}Controls_{it}+Year+Industry+δ_{it} \) (1)
First, without adding control variables and solely controlling for time, an examination is conducted on the dependent and explanatory variables. The regression results are shown in Table 3, Column (1). Then, after adding control variables at the enterprise level, another regression is conducted, and the results are displayed in Table 4, Column (2).
Table 4.Regression analysis
(1) |
(2) |
|
Variables |
Innovation |
Innovation |
Index |
0.179*** |
0.199*** |
-0.014 |
-0.033 |
|
Size |
-0.186** |
|
-0.078 |
||
Lev |
2.072** |
|
-0.851 |
||
Roa |
15.619** |
|
-6.417 |
||
Roe |
-5.236** |
|
-1.770 |
||
Indep |
-0.001* |
|
-0.002 |
||
TobinQ |
-0.230* |
|
-0.196 |
||
Constant |
-0.129** |
3.497* |
-0.047 |
-1.808 |
|
YEAR |
YES |
YES |
INDUSTRY |
YES |
YES |
Observations |
60 |
60 |
Number of id |
6 |
6 |
R-squared |
0.73 |
0.83 |
t-statistics in parentheses*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
Through the analysis of the regression results, it can be observed that the regression coefficient between the digital inclusive finance index and corporate innovation is significantly positive at the 1% level, which is 0.179. This indicates that digital inclusive finance has a positive impact on innovation in the sample enterprises. For each unit increase in the digital inclusive finance index, there is an increase of 0.179 units in the number of patent applications for small and medium-sized enterprises. Even after incorporating enterprise control variables, although there is a change in the regression coefficient, it remains significantly positive at the 1% level. This continues to demonstrate the promoting effect of digital inclusive finance on innovation in sample enterprises.
3.3. Robustness Test
To enhance the reliability of the results, this study adopts the Tobit model for robustness testing, and uses the least squares method to handle heteroscedasticity, reducing data errors. Analyzing lag effects can help understand the long-term impact of digital inclusive finance policies or industry development on corporate innovation.
Table 5.Robust outcome statistics
Test Item |
Test Statistic |
p-value |
Conclusion |
|
Tobit |
Z = 3.07 |
p = 0.002 |
Significant |
|
OLS |
t = 6.96 |
p = 0.00 |
Processed |
|
Hysteresis effect |
t = 5.15 |
p = 0.00 |
Significant |
Analysis indicates that in the Tobit model, p = 0.002 (p < 0.05), indicating the significant role of digital inclusive finance in enterprise innovation. This reflects that digital inclusive finance provides companies with more flexible and convenient financing channels, prompting increased investment in research and development, product innovation, and improvement in business models. Considering heteroscedasticity when handling the data, the adoption of the ordinary least squares method to eliminate heteroscedasticity improves the model's stability, allowing for a more accurate capture of the impact of digital inclusive finance on enterprise innovation. The significance of the lag effect with a result of p = 0.00 (p < 0.05) demonstrates the sustained effect of digital inclusive finance over time. This implies that the earlier development of digital inclusive finance will continue to have a lasting innovative effect in the later period. This implies that the earlier development of digital inclusive finance will continue to have a lasting innovative effect in the later period.
4. Conclusion and Recommendations
4.1. Conclusion
In general, digital inclusive finance has promoted innovation in construction enterprises. Through Pearson correlation tests, fixed-effects models, and robustness tests of Tobit models, this paper has found a significant promotion effect of digital inclusive finance on innovation within construction enterprises. The development of digital inclusive finance has provided enterprises with more convenient and flexible financing pathways, driving companies to increase their investments in research and development (R&D), implement product innovation, and improve business models. Furthermore, the research demonstrates that the impact of digital inclusive finance is not merely temporary but sustained over time. Early-stage development in digital inclusive finance will lead to sustained innovative effects in later stages. This indicates that companies, under the impetus of digital inclusive finance policies, continuously enhance their competitiveness and innovation capabilities through technological upgrades and product innovation.
4.2. Recommendations
In terms of policy formulation, government departments should continually devise policies that encourage the development of digital inclusive finance while maintaining stability in the policy implementation process. This includes measures such as providing fiscal support, tax incentives, etc., to reduce the costs for enterprises in using digital inclusive finance tools and stimulate their more active participation in innovation activities. Additionally, governments should also encourage the application of digital inclusive finance in sustainable development projects, such as supporting innovative initiatives in fields like green construction and clean energy undertaken by construction companies, to promote eco-friendly industry development.
In terms of enterprise management, construction companies should proactively incorporate digital inclusive finance into their strategic planning. Management can utilize the convenient financing pathways offered by digital inclusive finance to increase investments in research and development (R&D), technological improvements, and other areas. Construction companies can leverage digital inclusive finance tools to better respond to changing market demands, anticipate industry trends in advance, and drive the development of innovative products and services. Additionally, management in construction companies should focus on establishing an innovative culture, encouraging employees to propose new ideas and suggestions, and integrating innovative concepts across all levels of the enterprise.
In terms of financial institutions, providers of digital inclusive finance services need to continually innovate their products and services. Financial institutions can develop customized financial products tailored for construction companies, providing flexible financing solutions based on the specific needs of these enterprises. Simultaneously, financial institutions should strengthen cooperation with construction companies, providing specialized financial advisory services to assist enterprises in clarifying their future development directions, optimizing their capital structure, and enhancing financial performance. Furthermore, financial institutions can organize industry seminars, training courses, etc., to encourage construction companies to gain a deeper understanding of the application scenarios and operational methods of digital inclusive finance, thereby better utilizing these financial tools to drive innovation.
References
[1]. Sarma M .Index of Financial Inclusion €" A measure of financial sector inclusiveness[J].Hochschule fuer Technik und Wirtschaft, Berlin, 2012.
[2]. Lyman T, Lauer K .Digital financial inclusion : implications for customers, regulators, supervisors, and standard-setting bodies[J]. 2015.
[3]. Upadhyay A, Reddy K S .Digital financial inclusion - demand side vs. supply side approach[J].International Journal of Electronic Finance, 2021, 10(3):191-.
[4]. Chen Yin'e, Sun Qiong, Xu Wenyun. Research on the Distribution Dynamics and Spatial Convergence of Inclusive Finance Development in China [J]. Financial Economics Research, 2015,30 (06): 72-81
[5]. Jiao Jinpu, Huang Tingting, Wang Tiandu, et al. The Development Process and Empirical Study of Inclusive Finance in China [J]. Shanghai Finance, 2015 (04): 12-22
[6]. Guo Feng, Wang Jingyi, Wang Fang et al. Measuring the Development of Digital Inclusive Finance in China: Index Compilation and Spatial Characteristics [J]. Economics (Quarterly), 2020,19 (04): 1401-1418
[7]. Adhikari B K, Agrawal A Religion, gambling attributes and corporate innovation [J] Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016:229-248
[8]. Pan Yue, Pan Jianping, Dai Yiyi. Corporate Litigation Risk, Judicial Local Protectionism, and Enterprise Innovation [J]. Economic Research, 2015,50 (03): 131-145
[9]. Li Wenjing, Zheng Manni. Substantive innovation or strategic innovation—— The impact of macroeconomic industrial policies on micro enterprise innovation [J]. Economic Research, 2016,51 (04): 60-73
[10]. Xiang Dong, Tian Tingting, Li Nan. Digital Inclusive Finance, Financing Constraints, and Technological Innovation of Small and Medium sized Enterprises [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2023 (19): 38-48
[11]. Hu Shan, Yu Yongze. Digital Economy and Enterprise Innovation: Breakthrough Innovation or Progressive Innovation? [J] Research on Financial Issues, 2022 (01): 42-51
[12]. Li Rongjin, Yao Xiaolu. The Development of Digital Inclusive Finance and Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises: Based on Enterprise Data on the New Third Board [J/OL]. Business and Management: 1-12 [2023-10-24]
[13]. Zheng Manni Substantive innovation or strategic innovation The impact of macro industrial policies on micro enterprise innovation [D]. Jinan University, 2017
[14]. Wang Qianying, Li Zhiqiang, Hu Chengsheng. Bootstrap Hausman test for individual effects in partial linear panel data models [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016,43 (01): 122-127
Cite this article
Li,X.;Cao,W. (2024). The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Innovation of Construction Enterprises. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,3,12-19.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal:Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Sarma M .Index of Financial Inclusion €" A measure of financial sector inclusiveness[J].Hochschule fuer Technik und Wirtschaft, Berlin, 2012.
[2]. Lyman T, Lauer K .Digital financial inclusion : implications for customers, regulators, supervisors, and standard-setting bodies[J]. 2015.
[3]. Upadhyay A, Reddy K S .Digital financial inclusion - demand side vs. supply side approach[J].International Journal of Electronic Finance, 2021, 10(3):191-.
[4]. Chen Yin'e, Sun Qiong, Xu Wenyun. Research on the Distribution Dynamics and Spatial Convergence of Inclusive Finance Development in China [J]. Financial Economics Research, 2015,30 (06): 72-81
[5]. Jiao Jinpu, Huang Tingting, Wang Tiandu, et al. The Development Process and Empirical Study of Inclusive Finance in China [J]. Shanghai Finance, 2015 (04): 12-22
[6]. Guo Feng, Wang Jingyi, Wang Fang et al. Measuring the Development of Digital Inclusive Finance in China: Index Compilation and Spatial Characteristics [J]. Economics (Quarterly), 2020,19 (04): 1401-1418
[7]. Adhikari B K, Agrawal A Religion, gambling attributes and corporate innovation [J] Journal of Corporate Finance, 2016:229-248
[8]. Pan Yue, Pan Jianping, Dai Yiyi. Corporate Litigation Risk, Judicial Local Protectionism, and Enterprise Innovation [J]. Economic Research, 2015,50 (03): 131-145
[9]. Li Wenjing, Zheng Manni. Substantive innovation or strategic innovation—— The impact of macroeconomic industrial policies on micro enterprise innovation [J]. Economic Research, 2016,51 (04): 60-73
[10]. Xiang Dong, Tian Tingting, Li Nan. Digital Inclusive Finance, Financing Constraints, and Technological Innovation of Small and Medium sized Enterprises [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2023 (19): 38-48
[11]. Hu Shan, Yu Yongze. Digital Economy and Enterprise Innovation: Breakthrough Innovation or Progressive Innovation? [J] Research on Financial Issues, 2022 (01): 42-51
[12]. Li Rongjin, Yao Xiaolu. The Development of Digital Inclusive Finance and Innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises: Based on Enterprise Data on the New Third Board [J/OL]. Business and Management: 1-12 [2023-10-24]
[13]. Zheng Manni Substantive innovation or strategic innovation The impact of macro industrial policies on micro enterprise innovation [D]. Jinan University, 2017
[14]. Wang Qianying, Li Zhiqiang, Hu Chengsheng. Bootstrap Hausman test for individual effects in partial linear panel data models [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016,43 (01): 122-127