Download pdf
NFT auction: Implementing smart contracts for decentralized transactions
- 1 Northwest University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In the wake of blockchain and Web3 technological advancements, Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have emerged as prominent digital assets within the realms of art, gaming, and virtual commodities. Unlike their traditional counterparts, NFT auctions harness the virtues of decentralization, transparency, and immutability, ushering in a new era for trading artworks and other digital assets. This paper embarks on an exploration, first laying down the foundational principles of blockchain technology and NFTs. A comparative analysis follows, juxtaposing the dynamics of NFT auctions with the modus operandi of traditional auctions. Within the theoretical scaffold, the nuances of decentralization and trust in NFT auctions are elucidated, spotlighting the pivotal role of smart contracts throughout the auction trajectory. The emphasis also gravitates towards transparency and security, two cornerstones ensuring the integrity of the auction process. Diving into the methodology, this section delineates the research blueprint and the techniques employed for program testing. Delving into the practicalities, the discourse meticulously unpacks the architecture and operability of the smart contract, gauging its efficacy through rigorous assessments. Beyond the present scope, the paper ventures to uncover potential applications and horizons awaiting NFT auctions across diverse sectors.
Keywords
Non-Fungible Tokens, Blockchain, Smart contracts, Transparency
[1]. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
[2]. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118-127.
[3]. Fenwick, M., & Jurcys, P. (2022). The contested meaning of Web3 and why it matters for (IP) lawyers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/xxxx (Assuming there’s a DOI).
[4]. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., Chen, S., Ryan, M., & Hardjono, T. (2022). Exploring web3 from the view of blockchain. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08821.
[5]. Wilson, K. B., Karg, A., & Ghaderi, H. (2022). Prospecting non-fungible tokens in the digital economy: Stakeholders and ecosystem, risk and opportunity. Business Horizons, 65(5), 657-670.
[6]. Belk, R., Humayun, M., & Brouard, M. (2022). Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and wild markets. Journal of Business Research, 153, 198-205.
[7]. Milionis, J., Hirsch, D., Arditi, A., & Garimidi, P. (2022, November). A framework for single-item NFT auction mechanism design. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security (pp. 31-38).
[8]. Murray, M. D. (2022). NFT ownership and copyrights. Ind. L. Rev., 56, 367.
[9]. Röscheisen, M., Baldonado, M., Chang, K., Gravano, L., Ketchpel, S., & Paepcke, A. (1998). The Stanford InfoBus and its service layers: Augmenting the Internet with higher-level information management protocols. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[10]. Savelyev, A. (2017). Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(2), 116-134.
[11]. Alabdulwahhab, F. A. (2018, April). Web 3.0: The decentralized web blockchain networks and protocol innovation. In 2018 1st International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[12]. Sheridan, D., Harris, J., Wear, F., Cowell Jr, J., Wong, E., & Yazdinejad, A. (2022). Web3 challenges and opportunities for the market. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02446
[13]. Samreen, N. F., & Alalfi, M. H. (2020, February). Reentrancy vulnerability identification in ethereum smart contracts. In 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE) (pp. 22-29). IEEE.
[14]. Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2019). Security, performance, and applications of smart contracts: A systematic survey. IEEE Access, 7, 50759-50779.
[15]. Valeonti, F., Bikakis, A., Terras, M., Speed, C., Hudson-Smith, A., & Chalkias, K. (2021). Crypto collectibles, museum funding, and OpenGLAM: Challenges, opportunities and the potential of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Applied Sciences, 11(21), 9931.
Cite this article
Xiao,B. (2024). NFT auction: Implementing smart contracts for decentralized transactions. Applied and Computational Engineering,53,9-18.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).