1. Introduction
The goal of carbon neutrality is to achieve net zero carbon emissions or negative carbon emissions by removing or reducing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to offset or reduce carbon dioxide emissions from human activities [1-5]. It is a strategy to combat climate change and global warming, and aims to mitigate and mitigate the effects of climate change [6]. In the process of carbon neutrality, we need to minimize the emission of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and increase or enhance the absorption and fixation of carbon dioxide through various methods to achieve climate neutrality. This means that the carbon dioxide emissions from human activities do not exceed the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed and fixed by the Earth’s systems, resulting in net zero or negative carbon emissions [7].
Achieving carbon neutrality requires a global effort involving actions in different areas, such as promoting renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, establishing and facilitating carbon trading and markets, and improving energy efficiency [7]. At present, plants are the main means of controlling carbon neutrality [8], plants absorb carbon dioxide in the atmosphere through photosynthesis [9], convert it into organic matter, and convert the absorbed carbon into biomass [10], such as trees, leaves, roots, etc., and store a lot of carbon in the plant body. For example, forest carbon sequestration [11], through forest restoration and afforestation projects, has increased a large amount of forest [12] and vegetation cover globally and improved the carbon sequestration capacity of plants [13]. In addition to forests, other types of vegetation, such as grasslands, wetlands, and farmland, release organic matter through their roots as they grow, which can improve the texture and structure of the soil, promote more carbon storage, and reduce the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
In addition to storing carbon, plants have many other related roles in the process of carbon neutrality [14]. For example, plant transpiration helps regulate the water cycle by taking water from the soil and releasing it into the atmosphere through leaf transpiration [15]; In order to protect and improve the soil environment, the roots of plants can protect the soil from wind and water erosion and prevent the deterioration of soil quality. At the same time, plant leaves and residues can be gradually degraded into organic matter, improve soil structure and fertility, increase soil organic carbon content, and help to achieve carbon neutrality.
As shown in Figure 1, in this review, I provide the process by which plants absorb and convert carbon dioxide, an overview of the role of plants in achieving carbon neutrality and how plants in different regions can help address the greenhouse effect [10] and achieve carbon neutrality [9]. Firstly, the carbon dioxide monitoring function of plants is briefly introduced [8], and how people use plants to measure carbon dioxide content is introduced. It then Outlines how Marine and continental plants can reduce greenhouse pollution. In addition, other ways to control the greenhouse effect of plants in conjunction with other fields such as physical chemistry are discussed to achieve the goals of climate change mitigation and carbon neutrality. Finally, it presents current insights on the use of plants to monitor and control carbon pollution to achieve carbon neutrality, and assesses future trends in plant control of the greenhouse effect and the challenges of reversing global warming and the greenhouse effect.
Figure 1.The theory of how the plant purified air
2. Plants can monitor carbon dioxide
2.1. Direct monitoring plant
For carbon dioxide, some plants can be used as indicator plants to indirectly reflect the content or concentration of carbon dioxide in the environment because of their physiological characteristics or reaction mechanisms [13]. These plants usually exhibit special physiological or morphological changes in high carbon dioxide concentrations. Table 1 shows the different indicator plants, their indicative sites and the year in which the relevant literature was published.
Table 1. Plants which can direct monitoring of carbon dioxide
Type | Part | year |
Dalbergia sissoo Roxb | Total carbohydrate | 2013 |
Microalgae | Hydrogen production | 2016 |
Microalgae | Carbon streaming | 2017 |
Aalae | Photosynthesis | 2022 |
Eukaryotic marine phytoplankton | Carbon concentrating mechanisms | 2011 |
Marine diatoms | Carbon dioxide concentration mechanisms | 2021 |
Mangrove forests | Carbon stocks | 2014 |
Echinocereus | Transpiration | 1974 |
Saguaro cactus | Seasonal controls on ecosystem-scale CO2 | 2018 |
Coral reef | Community calcification | 2018 |
Moss | Air purification | 2023 |
2.2. Indirect monitoring plant
Some plants can not directly show the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air or other carbon content through external performance, can not be used as carbon dioxide indicator plants, but these plants can absorb carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis and convert it into organic matter [12], so as to fix carbon in their own bodies, with the potential to fix carbon dioxide. Recent studies [10] have shown that plant diversity increases soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks by increasing carbon input from underground biomass and promoting microbial contributions to organic carbon storage. Affected by terrain, climate and vegetation types, different types of plants, plants in different regions and plants under different climatic conditions have different potential to fix carbon dioxide. A series of methods should be adopted according to the actual situation to increase the fixed carbon dioxide content of plants and improve the ability and efficiency of plants to purify air. Local CO2 levels are indirectly monitored by measuring the CO2 fixation potential of different plants in different regions. At the same time, by comparing and discussing the potential of vegetation to fix carbon dioxide in different regions, it can also provide ideas for improving the development of plant air purification technology. Table 2 shows the types of plants with high fixed carbon in different geographical Settings.
Table 2. Carbon fixation potential of plants in different regions
Place | Species | Year |
Agricultural landscapes | Hedgerows | 2022 |
Latin American tropics | Second-growth forest | 2016 |
Malaysian | Native microalgae species | 2020 |
Burkina Faso | Smallholder agroforestry parklands | 2016 |
Brazilian Amazon | Secondary forests | 2021 |
Norway | Forest | 2020 |
lower Gangetic plain | Young species | 2011 |
Global | Croplands | 2022 |
China | Forestry bioenergy | 2022 |
Global | Grassland | 2022 |
3. Plants absorb, fix, and transform carbon dioxide
Most plants can absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, trapping large amounts of it in their bodies and converting it back to organic carbon through the chemobiotic cycle. For example,Plants, algae and phytoplankton in the ocean take up carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and convert it into organic carbon, thus participating in the ocean carbon cycle. There are also carbon sinks in the ocean, such as Marine wetlands, coral reefs and seagrass beds, which can absorb and fix large amounts of carbon. Marine carbon neutral governance aims to protect Marine ecosystems, promote Marine carbon uptake and storage, and reduce climate change impacts such as ocean acidification and sea level rise.
In continental areas, forests can greatly increase carbon storage in continental areas;Water areas such as lakes and rivers can increase aquatic plant cover to enhance the carbon fixation capacity of water bodies; In desert areas, some drought-tolerant plants, such as cactus and desert willow, are adapted to dry environments and can grow in poorer soils [13]. These plants are able to fix carbon under extreme conditions and can be used to prevent soil erosion and increase carbon storage by growing adaptable plants.
4. Plants can be combined with other fields to control the greenhouse effect
Plants can not only rely on their own conditions to improve the greenhouse effect, but also cooperate with many other technical fields to jointly control environmental pollution and achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. In terms of biotechnology, synthetic biology can be used to intervene in the process of photosynthesis, so as to improve the efficiency of photosynthesis. In terms of physical technology, a series of related devices can be designed to help plants grow, improve the ecological environment, and indirectly promote plants to fix carbon dioxide; In terms of chemical technology, through the application of beneficial elements, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer, etc., to help plants grow vigorously, eliminate the interference of pests and diseases to promote the improvement of the greenhouse effect. Through scientific cooperation, climate change can be effectively and accurately mitigated, carbon neutral and sustainable development measures can be promoted, and a clean, green living environment can be created. Table 3 shows the different technologies of combining with plants to control environmental pollution.
Table 3.Technology of combining with plants to control environmental pollution
Technology | Effect | Year |
Multi-Media Maneuvering System | Mercury Emission Air Pollution | 2023 2015 |
Physics And Ecology | Mining Carbon Dioxide | 2019 |
Remote Sensing | Plants’ Faint Glow | 2014 |
Microbial Protein Production | Carbon-Neutral Food Systems | 2022 |
Universal Model | Carbon Dioxide Uptake By Plants | 2017 |
5. Conclusion
Currently, plants have demonstrated significant progress in various aspects of carbon neutrality, and the utilization of plants as instruments and methods to control carbon pollution is relatively advanced. However, there are still shortcomings in using plants to achieve carbon neutrality, including time and scale limitations, conflicts in land demand and use, vulnerability of ecosystems, unstable carbon storage, and concerns regarding cost and economic feasibility. Nevertheless, there remains a vast potential and untapped space for the exploration and utilization of plants that have not yet been fully utilized, such as lignaceous aquatic plants, high carbon sequestration potential tropical tree species, desert plants, and artificial plant species. Additionally, expanding the utilization of plants with the capacity to monitor CO2 but are currently underutilized, such as grasslands, native plants, aquatic plants, and wild tree species, is necessary.
To overcome the challenges associated with using plants for carbon neutrality, it is crucial to develop the integration of plants with other technological aspects, break through technical barriers, enhance governance efficiency, and innovate cutting-edge governance methods. Examples of such advancements include the improvement of carbon capture and storage technology, biochar preparation, plant and climate modeling, and technologies for tracking the carbon cycle. There are still numerous obstacles to overcome on the path to achieving carbon neutrality through plant utilization, and it is expected that future research will focus on relevant scientific directions to achieve carbon neutrality through sustainable approaches.
References
[1]. Erhabor, G.E., A.O. Arawomo, and D. Sanni, Climate Change and the Global Impact. West Afr J Med, 2022. 39(10): p. 991-992.
[2]. Zandalinas, S.I., F.B. Fritschi, and R. Mittler, Global Warming, Climate Change, and Environmental Pollution: Recipe for a Multifactorial Stress Combination Disaster. Trends Plant Sci, 2021. 26(6): p. 588-599.
[3]. Wilson, M., Climate Change. Can Vet J, 2020. 61(3): p. 225.
[4]. He, Q. and B.R. Silliman, Climate Change, Human Impacts, and Coastal Ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr Biol, 2019. 29(19): p. R1021-r1035.
[5]. Harrison, M.T., et al., Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector. Glob Chang Biol, 2021. 27(22): p. 5726-5761.
[6]. Hao, X., D. Batstone, and J.S. Guest, Carbon neutrality: An ultimate goal towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants. Water Res, 2015. 87: p. 413-5.
[7]. Zhang, Z., et al., From low carbon to carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of the status, evolution and development trend. J Environ Manage, 2022. 322: p. 116087.
[8]. You, X., et al., Sustainability and carbon neutrality trends for microalgae-based wastewater treatment: A review. Environ Res, 2022. 209: p. 112860.
[9]. Busch, F.A., R.F. Sage, and G.D. Farquhar, Plants increase CO(2) uptake by assimilating nitrogen via the photorespiratory pathway. Nat Plants, 2018. 4(1): p. 46-54.
[10]. Oey, M., et al., Challenges and opportunities for hydrogen production from microalgae. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016. 14(7): p. 1487-99.
[11]. Jiang, M., et al., The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature, 2020. 580(7802): p. 227-231.
[12]. Liu, X., et al., Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proc Biol Sci, 2018. 285(1885).
[13]. Yu, G., et al., High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014. 111(13): p. 4910-5.
[14]. Hong, S.H., et al., Study of the removal difference in indoor particulate matter and volatile organic compounds through the application of plants. Environ Health Toxicol, 2017. 32: p. e2017006.
[15]. Stutz, S.S., et al., Inside out: efflux of carbon dioxide from leaves represents more than leaf metabolism. J Exp Bot, 2017. 68(11): p. 2849-2857.
Cite this article
Ma,M. (2024). Contribution and impact of plants to achieving carbon neutrality under global climate change. Applied and Computational Engineering,56,193-197.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Materials Chemistry and Environmental Engineering
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Erhabor, G.E., A.O. Arawomo, and D. Sanni, Climate Change and the Global Impact. West Afr J Med, 2022. 39(10): p. 991-992.
[2]. Zandalinas, S.I., F.B. Fritschi, and R. Mittler, Global Warming, Climate Change, and Environmental Pollution: Recipe for a Multifactorial Stress Combination Disaster. Trends Plant Sci, 2021. 26(6): p. 588-599.
[3]. Wilson, M., Climate Change. Can Vet J, 2020. 61(3): p. 225.
[4]. He, Q. and B.R. Silliman, Climate Change, Human Impacts, and Coastal Ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Curr Biol, 2019. 29(19): p. R1021-r1035.
[5]. Harrison, M.T., et al., Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector. Glob Chang Biol, 2021. 27(22): p. 5726-5761.
[6]. Hao, X., D. Batstone, and J.S. Guest, Carbon neutrality: An ultimate goal towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants. Water Res, 2015. 87: p. 413-5.
[7]. Zhang, Z., et al., From low carbon to carbon neutrality: A bibliometric analysis of the status, evolution and development trend. J Environ Manage, 2022. 322: p. 116087.
[8]. You, X., et al., Sustainability and carbon neutrality trends for microalgae-based wastewater treatment: A review. Environ Res, 2022. 209: p. 112860.
[9]. Busch, F.A., R.F. Sage, and G.D. Farquhar, Plants increase CO(2) uptake by assimilating nitrogen via the photorespiratory pathway. Nat Plants, 2018. 4(1): p. 46-54.
[10]. Oey, M., et al., Challenges and opportunities for hydrogen production from microalgae. Plant Biotechnol J, 2016. 14(7): p. 1487-99.
[11]. Jiang, M., et al., The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature, 2020. 580(7802): p. 227-231.
[12]. Liu, X., et al., Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proc Biol Sci, 2018. 285(1885).
[13]. Yu, G., et al., High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014. 111(13): p. 4910-5.
[14]. Hong, S.H., et al., Study of the removal difference in indoor particulate matter and volatile organic compounds through the application of plants. Environ Health Toxicol, 2017. 32: p. e2017006.
[15]. Stutz, S.S., et al., Inside out: efflux of carbon dioxide from leaves represents more than leaf metabolism. J Exp Bot, 2017. 68(11): p. 2849-2857.