Integrating Deep Learning with Generative Design and Topology Optimization for Efficient Additive Manufacturing

Research Article
Open access

Integrating Deep Learning with Generative Design and Topology Optimization for Efficient Additive Manufacturing

Lufan Huang 1*
  • 1 Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan    
  • *corresponding author huanglufang@gmail.com
Published on 8 November 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/116/20251723
ACE Vol.116
ISSN (Print): 2755-273X
ISSN (Online): 2755-2721
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-791-1
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-792-8

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) through generative design and topology optimisation creates complex, lightweight structures with exceptional material efficiency and structural integrity. When coupled with deep learning functionality, generative design and topology optimisation can explore broader design spaces and optimise more efficiently, creating novel AM structures that utilise material more efficiently and have better strength and performance than their counterparts created through conventional AM methods. The study tackles how deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be integrated into generative design and topology optimisation and how these integration help optimise material usage, production time and performance. Case studies from the aerospace, automotive, and healthcare industries exemplify how these synergies resulted in more resilient, cost-effective designs that would not have been possible through conventional AM approaches. The study focuses on material usage efficiency, reduction in production time and performance improvement to showcase how deep learning integrations enhance the process from design conceptualisation, through iterations, to final production.

Keywords:

Generative Design, Topology Optimization, Deep Learning, Additive Manufacturing, Material Efficiency.

Huang,L. (2024). Integrating Deep Learning with Generative Design and Topology Optimization for Efficient Additive Manufacturing. Applied and Computational Engineering,116,55-60.
Export citation

1. Introduction

Additive manufacturing, otherwise known as 3D printing, is being used in aerospace, automotive, healthcare and consumer goods industries, among others. It holds the potential to radically improve our manufacturing capabilities, but the most recent and significant advancement of design principles has been the introduction of both generative design and topology optimisation, which allow designers to produce complex, lightweight and strong structures that are difficult to achieve with traditional design methods. In the past decade, deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been integrated into additive manufacturing, enabling the reduction of repeatable and iterative design processes while allowing designs to be developed more efficiently. Generative deep learning models process large datasets to find patterns in design parameters not explicit to human designers and therefore enable the consideration of extremely complex design spaces which would be otherwise intractable. Combining generative design, topology optimisation and deep learning can increase the accuracy of distributed design such that many more parameters are considered when designing between materials. Design spaces that are much larger and more complex can now be utilised at once, rather than trying to considering only a few factors individually. The predictive power of deep learning also allows many more design iterations to be generated in a fraction of the time it would have taken using traditional design methods. In this paper, we examine the combined power of deep learning, generative design and topology optimisation in additive manufacturing. By combining theoretical frameworks and practical case studies, we will demonstrate how deep learning enhances design accuracy, reduces production time and provides robust performance to manufactured components [1]. We find that this combined deep learning, generative design and topology optimisation framework has the potential to bring about material-efficient, structurally optimal and cost-effective solutions to additive manufacturing.

2. Generative Design and Deep Learning

2.1. Evolution of Generative Design

As it has evolved over the past decades, the notion of "generative design" continues to move further away from traditional processes that rely heavily on designer intuition and manual iteration. Generative design with deep learning, for example, allows for the automation and acceleration of complex processes that are very time-consuming and error-prone when completed manually. In the approach to deep learning, generative design algorithms utilise neural networks to analyse large data sets and detect patterns that are not easily detectable by a human designer. This ability to analyse huge volumes of data and detect patterns that were not previously considered by human designers allows the generated design to explore a much larger design space, considering multiple factors simultaneously, such as material properties, structural integrity, manufacturability, etc. The automation of complex processes that was previously not possible or cost-effective to be completed manually has allowed designers to explore a much larger design space, leading to unique and optimised designs for a specific application [2]. Table 1 below exemplifies the evolution of generative design aided by deep learning, illustrating how time efficiency, number of iteration required, the size of design space explored, their material efficiency, structural integrity and feasibility for 3D printing.

Table 1. Evolution of Generative Design with Deep Learning

Design Process

Time (Hours)

Iterations Required

Design Space Explored (%)

Material Efficiency (%)

Structural Integrity (%)

Feasibility for 3D Printing

Traditional Design

100

15

20

70

80

Low

Generative Design (Pre-Deep Learning)

60

10

50

85

90

Medium

Generative Design with Deep Learning

20

3

95

95

95

High

2.2. Benefits of Deep Learning in Generative Design

Perhaps the most profound benefit of this approach, enabled by deep learning, is the ability to model very high-dimensional, nonlinear dependencies between the design parameter space and outputs. Deep learning models trained with techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly suitable to handle this kind of high-dimensional data that’s typical of data-heavy design optimisation problems. By training on massive datasets, these models can predict in real time how a change in any design parameter will impact the overall solution. So, by incorporating this predictive capability, these models can influence how each design parameter is adjusted in each iteration. For example, you could use the process to train models to predict the aerodynamic performance of an aircraft’s wing. This could be used to select the composition of its foam materials, allowing you to maximise strength while minimising weight. Aerospace and automotive firms have very stringent performance requirements, so any deviation from optimal performance can have dire consequences; predictive capabilities of this nature are hugely beneficial to such firms. In addition, deep learning can significantly reduce the need for human input during the design process, freeing human designers to focus on creative, strategic aspects of the process [3]. The more the models learn from each iteration of the design process, the better they get at finding solutions that balance multiple competing objectives, such as reducing weight while increasing strength. The nature of these models means that the designs can be continually refined to improve over preceding designs, leading to improved-performing products.

2.3. Real-World Applications of Generative Design

These applications are now being realised by integrating generative design with deep learning across industries. In aerospace, generative design is being leveraged to create lightweight components for aircraft engines and fuselages that are strong enough to withstand flying speeds and operation in the sky, but have lower fuel consumption. These designs tend to look more organic, with a lattice-like shapes that would be impossible to produce with traditional manufacturing methods, but can be created easily with 3D printing. In medicine, generative design is being applied to create patient-specific implants based on a specific patient’s individual anatomy. For instance, deep-learning algorithms can be used to analyse CT or MRI scans, and generate individual implants based on the patient’s data [4]. In the case of an artificial hip, the patient’s hips. algorithms are being used to create ergonomic and aesthetically pleasing pieces that can also are designed with the purpose of making people feel comfortable, but they are also As deep learning advances, the breadth of applications for generative design will likely grow further, and this would likely be the case for other technological areas too. Areas such as architecture, automotive engineering and even fashion could incorporate artificial intelligence to create innovative and unique products in the future.

3. Topology Optimization with Deep Learning

3.1. Fundamentals of Topology Optimization

Often, designing for material efficiency and structural performance can be a matter of where the material is placed, rather than its specific properties. Topology optimisation is the optimisation method that underlies these types of designs. It begins by placing material inside a design space, assigning loads and boundary conditions, then removing material from the design space through an iterative optimisation process that removes unneeded material. These optimisations usually require a fair amount of computational power. However, deep learning means that topology optimisations can now be drastically accelerated [5]. By training neural networks to recognise and predict optimal material distributions, deep learning models allow for personalisation based on behalf of the specific design application, iterating over millions of designs to find the best one. Deep learning has the ability to reduce the time and computational power required to achieve optimised designs by orders of magnitude, making the iterative design process much more effective. In iterative design processes, where producing multiple optimisations may be necessary to arrive at the optimum shape or size, deep learning can be extremely valuable.

3.2. Deep Learning for Topology Prediction

This application of deep learning to topology optimisation represents a major advance in the design of structures. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are especially well-suited to this task due to their capacity to learn from spatial data and the representation and recognition of objects in this data. Despite being trained on datasets of successful topology optimisations, these networks can learn to predict an optimal material layout for new designs based on experimentally supplied initial conditions and constraints. The ability of neural-network methods to make predictions about possible designs is transformative: rather than needing to iterate through many design variations to produce a final product, engineers can quickly generate numerous potential designs for a given system, and rapidly score them before pursuing the best option. These deep learning models can also make by learning to identify the optimal topologies given constraints on the fabrication method, acting as a filter that ensures that the resulting designs can be manufactured using the chosen fabrication method (eg, 3D printing). Notably, the advancement of topology optimisation through deep learning also enables the design of more complex problems, where the range of possible feasible solutions is difficult to map out using traditional methods [6]. This is especially important in the design of advanced materials and structures, as the interactions between material properties and the overensional. The predictive capabilities of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be mathematically modeled to demonstrate their role in topology optimization.As shown in the formula \( {T^{*}}= \) CNN \( (I,C,M) \) ,the CNN takes the initial design conditions \( I \) ,constraints \( C \) ,and manufacturability considerations \( M \) as inputs to predict the optimal topology \( {T^{*}}. \) This model effectively captures how deep learning streamlines the design process by automating the exploration of complex design spaces. By learning from prior successful optimizations, the CNN can quickly generate topologies that not only meet structural performance requirements but are also feasible for manufacturing using technologies like 3D printing. This integration ensures that deep learning models provide both practical and innovative solutions, bridging the gap between theoretical design and real- world application.

3.3. Efficiency Gains in Additive Manufacturing

In additive manufacturing, the use of deep learning along with topology optimisation enables significant efficiency gains in material usage and production time. The deep learning gets effective at material distribution optimisation to reduce material waste and production time, and this is important as material cost is high in industries like aerospace and automotive. Also, having a lightweight component is critical in these industries and efficient distribution minimises the product weight. The gains in efficiency through deep learning are not limited to material distribution, but also to the manufacturing time. Through the use of deep learning, the 3D printing process can be modelled and trained to identify any possible issues beforehand, including warping or delamination, and then solve the issues to achieve the desired physical outcome. The predictive capability reduces the need for trial-and-error techniques, which saves time and reduces the time to market. Moreover, the optimised designs coming out of the process are more robust, which leads to a longer lifespan of the product as the need for maintenance is replaced in due course [7]. As additive manufacturing grows, the use of deep learning along with topology optimisation will become more critical to drive such efficiency gains. Table 2 represents the efficiency gains using and without the use of deep learning and topology optimisation in additive manufacturing.

Table 2. Efficiency Gains in Additive Manufacturing

Metric

Without Deep Learning

With Deep Learning

Material Usage (%)

80

95

Production Time (Hours)

50

30

Waste Reduction (%)

10

30

Cost Savings (%)

15

25

Resilience Improvement (%)

70

90

4. Enhancing Material Efficiency and Structural Integrity

4.1. Material Efficiency

Material efficiency is becoming increasingly important in manufacturing today, particularly in sectors where raw materials are costly or scarce. The use of deep learning in generative design and topology optimisation can powerfully enhance material efficiency. Integrating deep learning models into a generative design process that allows the program to explore the design space of possible solutions can identify configurations that use the minimal amount of material needed to meet all performance targets. This is done through a deep learning model’s ‘learning’ how to make better predictions based on each previous optimisation, improving with each new round of object fabrication. Following a deep learning process for generative design, aerospace components could be produced with greatly reduced material content, making them lighter and also reducing the amount of materials that need to go into making the component. In turn, this reduces the energy demands of the overall manufacturing process, which can lower costs related to raw materials and also the energy inputs associated with producing them [8]. It can also enhance the sustainability of the manufacturing process, reducing the overall waste introduced into the supply chain. This is because the use of a deep learning model that optimises the topology of a structure enables engineers to make sure each gram of material contributes to the performance of the structure.

4.2. Structural Integrity

Although achieving material efficiency is important, a structure also needs to be strong and durable in order for the final product to be able to hold up to the stresses and loads it will experience in the operational environment. An important aspect of this kind of design is data-driven prediction of the effect of different material distributions on the structural integrity of the overall shape generated by the algorithm. This is where the second type of design improvement comes into play: deep learning models can be trained on massive amounts of data, including datasets on material properties, load-bearing capabilities and failure-mode characteristics. With this training, the models can automatically identify spots that would cause a potentially weak spot in the structure of a design, after which a new version can be generated by adjusting the distribution of materials. This capability is particularly useful and important in the aerospace and automotive industry, where safety is of critical importance. By simultaneously optimising for structural integrity and material efficiency, engineers can create designs that are as lightweight as possible, but also robust and reliable [9]. This kind of dual-objective optimisation is a unique benefit of utilising deep learning methods in generative design and topology optimisation, as it enforces the achievement of both performance objectives at the same time, making it impossible for the deep learning algorithm to generate a design that would be lightweight but compromises safety or one that would be safe but does not meet material efficiency requirements. Figure 1 displays the clear benefits of deep learning in the generative design and topology optimisation process. [10]

/word/media/image1.pngFigure 1. Impact of Deep Learning on Structural Integrity and Material Efficiency

5. Conclusion

The symbiotic relationship between deep learning and the application of generative design and topology optimisation reinforces our vision of the future additive manufacturing landscape. As demonstrated in this paper, leveraging the capabilities of established deep learning architectures, such as the convolutional neural network, will lead to the ability to explore larger design spaces, optimise for material usage and improve structural integrity in ways that would have been infeasible just a few years ago. This paper has demonstrated the extent of efficiency gains that application of deep learning to topology optimisation enables, including dramatically reducing production time and material waste. Additionally, the exploration of practical applications of the integration of deep learning and generative design, ranging from aerospace to healthcare, further highlight deep learning importance for the industries that want to maximise performance or minimise cost and time-to-market. As deep learning models continue to be further developed and refined towards more advanced capabilities, it is inevitable that the spectrum of applications in additive manufacturing will continue to grow. The future of design and manufacturing will be defined by the ability to seamlessly and holistically integrate modern technological capabilities that open new possibilities for how we push the limits of modern engineering.


References

[1]. Bucher, Martin Juan José, et al. "Performance-based generative design for parametric modeling of engineering structures using deep conditional generative models." Automation in Construction 156 (2023): 105128.

[2]. Ni, Bo, David L. Kaplan, and Markus J. Buehler. "Generative design of de novo proteins based on secondary-structure constraints using an attention-based diffusion model." Chem 9.7 (2023): 1828-1849.

[3]. Zhu, Bao, et al. "Generative design of texture for sliding surface based on machine learning." Tribology International 179 (2023): 108139.

[4]. Hankins, Sarah N., et al. "Generative design of large-scale fluid flow structures via steady-state diffusion-based dehomogenization." Scientific Reports 13.1 (2023): 14344.

[5]. Nourian, Pirouz, Shervin Azadi, and Robin Oval. "Generative design in architecture: From mathematical optimization to grammatical customization." Computational Design and Digital Manufacturing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. 1-43.

[6]. Rosen, David W., and Christina Youngmi Choi. "Research issues in the generative design of cyber-physical-human systems." Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 23.6 (2023): 060810.

[7]. Starodubcev, Nikita O., et al. "Generative design of physical objects using modular framework." Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 119 (2023): 105715.

[8]. Momeni Rad, Faeze, Christoph Sydora, and Karim El-Basyouny. "Leveraging generative design and point cloud data to improve conformance to passing lane layout." Sensors 24.2 (2024): 318.

[9]. Klooker, Marie, and Katharina Hölzle. "A generative design of collaborative innovation space." R&D Management 54.2 (2024): 323-346.

[10]. Timperley, Louis, et al. "Towards improving the design space exploration process using generative design with mbse." 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, 2023.


Cite this article

Huang,L. (2024). Integrating Deep Learning with Generative Design and Topology Optimization for Efficient Additive Manufacturing. Applied and Computational Engineering,116,55-60.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning

ISBN:978-1-83558-791-1(Print) / 978-1-83558-792-8(Online)
Editor:Stavros Shiaeles
Conference website: https://2025.confspml.org/
Conference date: 12 January 2025
Series: Applied and Computational Engineering
Volume number: Vol.116
ISSN:2755-2721(Print) / 2755-273X(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Bucher, Martin Juan José, et al. "Performance-based generative design for parametric modeling of engineering structures using deep conditional generative models." Automation in Construction 156 (2023): 105128.

[2]. Ni, Bo, David L. Kaplan, and Markus J. Buehler. "Generative design of de novo proteins based on secondary-structure constraints using an attention-based diffusion model." Chem 9.7 (2023): 1828-1849.

[3]. Zhu, Bao, et al. "Generative design of texture for sliding surface based on machine learning." Tribology International 179 (2023): 108139.

[4]. Hankins, Sarah N., et al. "Generative design of large-scale fluid flow structures via steady-state diffusion-based dehomogenization." Scientific Reports 13.1 (2023): 14344.

[5]. Nourian, Pirouz, Shervin Azadi, and Robin Oval. "Generative design in architecture: From mathematical optimization to grammatical customization." Computational Design and Digital Manufacturing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. 1-43.

[6]. Rosen, David W., and Christina Youngmi Choi. "Research issues in the generative design of cyber-physical-human systems." Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 23.6 (2023): 060810.

[7]. Starodubcev, Nikita O., et al. "Generative design of physical objects using modular framework." Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 119 (2023): 105715.

[8]. Momeni Rad, Faeze, Christoph Sydora, and Karim El-Basyouny. "Leveraging generative design and point cloud data to improve conformance to passing lane layout." Sensors 24.2 (2024): 318.

[9]. Klooker, Marie, and Katharina Hölzle. "A generative design of collaborative innovation space." R&D Management 54.2 (2024): 323-346.

[10]. Timperley, Louis, et al. "Towards improving the design space exploration process using generative design with mbse." 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, 2023.