
A Review of the Clinical Application of Endovascular Electrodes and Its Future Prospects
- 1 School of Physics, Xidian University, Xi’an, 710126, China
- 2 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation BUAA, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
- 3 Department of Automation, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 072003, China
- 4 School of Integrated Circuits, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116100, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) has been used to treat neurological diseases. Traditional BCI technologies are usually invasive and may damage neural tissue during implantation. However, endovascular electrodes (EE) are a promising solution to the above problem. They represent a minimally invasive neural technique that can reduce the risks associated with surgery and its complications. In this review, we summarized the research progress on EE technology in animal models and human clinical trials. In addition, we reviewed the development of devices that can enhance EE applications, focusing on the representative product StentrodeTM. Finally, we discussed the prospects of EE technology based on current experimental results. Early animal experiments have demonstrated the safety and viability of EE, while recent human trials have shown its potential in treating diseases such as paralysis. Besides, with the development of technology, EE may be applied in a broader range of areas. In conclusion, existing studies indicate that EE can overcome the limitations of traditional BCIs and suggest a wider use of EE in the future.
Keywords
brain computer interface (BCI), endovascular electrodes (EE), paralysis, neural disease, minimally invasive treatment, StentrodeTM
[1]. B. Thielen et al., “Making a case for endovascular approaches for neural recording and stimulation,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 011001, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb086.
[2]. K. Värbu, N. Muhammad, and Y. Muhammad, “Past, Present, and Future of EEG-Based BCI Applications,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22093331.
[3]. D. Khodagholy et al., “NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain,” Nat. Neurosci., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 310–315, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nn.3905.
[4]. E. Musk and Neuralink, “An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 21, no. 10, p. e16194, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.2196/16194.
[5]. R. F. Kirsch, A. B. Ajiboye, and J. P. Miller, “The Reconnecting the Hand and Arm with Brain (ReHAB) Commentary on ‘An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels,’” J Med Internet Res, vol. 21, no. 10, p. e16339, 2019, doi: 10.2196/16339.
[6]. Q. He et al., “The brain nebula: minimally invasive brain–computer interface by endovascular neural recording and stimulation,” J. NeuroInterventional Surg., p. jnis-2023-021296, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021296.
[7]. R. K. Sefcik, N. L. Opie, S. E. John, C. P. Kellner, J. Mocco, and T. J. Oxley, “The evolution of endovascular electroencephalography: historical perspective and future applications,” Neurosurg. Focus, vol. 40, no. 5, p. E7, May 2016, doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS15635.
[8]. Thomas James Oxley, “Sensing or Stimulating Ativity of Tissue,” US20140288667A1, Sep. 25, 2014
[9]. A. Zhang, E. T. Mandeville, L. Xu, C. M. Stary, E. H. Lo, and C. M. Lieber, “Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature,” Science, vol. 381, no. 6655, pp. 306–312, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1126/science.adh3916.
[10]. T. J. Oxley et al., “An ovine model of cerebral catheter venography for implantation of an endovascular neural interface,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 1020–1027, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161754.
[11]. N. L. Opie et al., “Focal stimulation of the sheep motor cortex with a chronically implanted minimally invasive electrode array mounted on an endovascular stent,” Nat. Biomed. Eng., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 907–914, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0321-z.
[12]. T. B. Mahoney, P.-C. Liu, D. B. Grayden, and S. E. John, “Comparison of Sub-Scalp EEG and Endovascular Stent-Electrode Array for Visual Evoked Potential Brain-Computer Interface,” in 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Sydney, Australia: IEEE, Jul. 2023, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340834.
[13]. V. S. Polikov, P. A. Tresco, and W. M. Reichert, “Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.015.
[14]. N. L. Opie et al., “Feasibility of a chronic, minimally invasive endovascular neural interface,” in 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE, Aug. 2016, pp. 4455–4458. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591716.
[15]. N. L. Opie et al., “Chronic impedance spectroscopy of an endovascular stent-electrode array,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 046020, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/046020.
[16]. S. E. John et al., “In Vivo Impedance Characterization of Cortical Recording Electrodes Shows Dependence on Electrode Location and Size,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 675–681, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2854623.
[17]. S. E. John et al., “Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable,” Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 8427, May 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26457-7.
[18]. T. J. Oxley et al., “Motor neuroprosthesis implanted with neurointerventional surgery improves capacity for activities of daily living tasks in severe paralysis: first in-human experience,” J. NeuroInterventional Surg., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 102–108, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862.
[19]. P. Mitchell et al., “Assessment of Safety of a Fully Implanted Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface for Severe Paralysis in 4 Patients: The Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) Study,” JAMA Neurol., vol. 80, no. 3, p. 270, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4847.
[20]. C. Neudorfer et al., “Endovascular deep brain stimulation: Investigating the relationship between vascular structures and deep brain stimulation targets,” Brain Stimulat., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1668–1677, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.016.
Cite this article
Zhang,Z.;Zhang,R.;Chen,Z.;Meng,J. (2025). A Review of the Clinical Application of Endovascular Electrodes and Its Future Prospects. Applied and Computational Engineering,132,27-35.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Machine Learning and Automation
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).