Comparison of algorithms that use deep learning to classify spam

Research Article
Open access

Comparison of algorithms that use deep learning to classify spam

Congying Dai 1*
  • 1 Computer science and technology, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200333, China    
  • *corresponding author 20001998@mail.ecust.edu.cn
ACE Vol.5
ISSN (Print): 2755-273X
ISSN (Online): 2755-2721
ISBN (Print): 978-1-915371-57-7
ISBN (Online): 978-1-915371-58-4

Abstract

Although the application of network security protocols and cryptography provides a certain security guarantee for Internet surfing, it is difficult to cure the persistent security problems. Driven by the promotion of e-mail technology and benefits, bad businesses will also issue promotional emails indiscriminately to a large number of mailboxes, and even drive the underground industry of private mailbox information trading. The existing spam filters use black and whitelists, sensitive word matching and other technologies, but they can not effectively filter all forms of spam, and non-spam is often filtered, which brings more trouble to users. With the rise of artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms have been applied to spam recognition, such as decision tree algorithm, Boosting algorithm, K nearest neighbour algorithm, SVM support vector machine algorithm, Bayesian principle related algorithms, etc. These methods based on traditional statistics can intelligently classify data sets with large differences and are often used together with expert systems with certain rules to classify spam. However, with the diversification of spam types, the old classification rules are relatively rigid, and new types of mail will be misjudged. In addition, statistics based natural language processing method is based on pre trained fixed dictionaries. For new words and polysemy words, it is impossible to give word vectors with accurate semantics, which brings difficulties to classification. This paper mainly studies the application of five machine learning algorithms in spam detection: improved naive Bayes algorithm, A Lite Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer (ALBERT) dynamic word vector algorithm, Bidirectional Gating Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) algorithm, the Inverted Multi-Index with Weighted Naive Bayes (IMI-WNB) algorithm and clustering analysis algorithm.

Keywords:

Spam detection, improved naive Bayes algorithm, ALBERT dynamic word vector algorithm, BiGRU algorithm, IMI-WNB algorithm, clustering analysis algorithm

Dai,C. (2023). Comparison of algorithms that use deep learning to classify spam. Applied and Computational Engineering,5,193-198.
Export citation

References

[1]. Junjun F and Li L 2021 Computer knowledge and technology 154-155

[2]. Junjun F and Li L 2021 Computer knowledge and technology 36-37

[3]. Pan D 2019 Yanshan University 10

[4]. Lu W, Weizhi L, Chengde Z and Yongjiu L 2020 Sensors and Microsystems 46-48

[5]. Ge P 2020 Computer knowledge and technology 244-245

[6]. Zhining Z, Bingjun W, YIming D and Xin T 2020 Information Network Security 107-111

[7]. Yuxuan Z and Huaixiang H 2021 Computer and Modernization 122-126

[8]. Xiaopeng J 2021 Electronic Components and Information Technology 165-167

[9]. Jing W 2020 Qufu Normal University 106

[10]. Xuan G 2020 Computer and Modernization 17-22


Cite this article

Dai,C. (2023). Comparison of algorithms that use deep learning to classify spam. Applied and Computational Engineering,5,193-198.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning

ISBN:978-1-915371-57-7(Print) / 978-1-915371-58-4(Online)
Editor:Omer Burak Istanbullu
Conference website: http://www.confspml.org
Conference date: 25 February 2023
Series: Applied and Computational Engineering
Volume number: Vol.5
ISSN:2755-2721(Print) / 2755-273X(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Junjun F and Li L 2021 Computer knowledge and technology 154-155

[2]. Junjun F and Li L 2021 Computer knowledge and technology 36-37

[3]. Pan D 2019 Yanshan University 10

[4]. Lu W, Weizhi L, Chengde Z and Yongjiu L 2020 Sensors and Microsystems 46-48

[5]. Ge P 2020 Computer knowledge and technology 244-245

[6]. Zhining Z, Bingjun W, YIming D and Xin T 2020 Information Network Security 107-111

[7]. Yuxuan Z and Huaixiang H 2021 Computer and Modernization 122-126

[8]. Xiaopeng J 2021 Electronic Components and Information Technology 165-167

[9]. Jing W 2020 Qufu Normal University 106

[10]. Xuan G 2020 Computer and Modernization 17-22