Download pdf
Dilemma of ESG Development: Investors’ Perspectives
- 1 Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Rising concerns around environmental and social issues have led to a heightened investor focus on the ESG performance of corporations. This attention underscores the increasing relevance of ESG considerations in the decision-making processes of investors. However, as ESG investments have risen in popularity, there has also been an increase in contradictory voices. The purpose of this article is to analyze the intricate landscape of ESG investments from the perspective of investors. It aims to shed light on the implications of corporate ESG responses and how investors incorporate ESG parameters into their investment portfolios. The study reveals specific challenges namely: (1) Corporations incurring short-term costs for making transformations affecting their stability, consequently leading to possible reductions in investors' short-term returns; (2) Corporations potentially misleading investors through greenwashing strategies to enhance their ESG portrayal; (3) Requiring investors to possess comprehensive industry knowledge when incorporating ESG in risk assessment thereby adding to time constraints; (4) Existing discrepancies in ESG disclosure standards leading to inconsistencies in ESG ratings given by different agencies; (5) Tracing corporate ESG performance being complicated by its strong links to both the size and financial performance of the corporation; (6) Incorporating ESG factors into investment portfolios could introduce tracking errors and potentially compromise portfolio diversification. Therefore, it is necessary to advocate stricter regulations around ESG disclosures, refining reporting standards to enhance transparency and comparability. Additionally, there is a call for further research to better comprehend the intricate relationship between ESG and financial performance.
Keywords
ESG Performance, Sustainable investment, ESG disclosure, Greenwashing
[1]. World Bank (2017). Who cares wins : connecting financial markets to a changing world. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documentsreports/documentdetail/280911488968799581/who-cares-wins-connecting-financial-markets-to-a-changing-world
[2]. Cruz, C. A., & Matos, F. (2023). ESG Maturity: A software framework for the challenges of ESG data in investment. Sustainability, 15(3), 2610.
[3]. Ling, A., Li, J., Wen, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). When trackers are aware of ESG: Do ESG ratings matter to tracking error portfolio performance? Economic Modelling, 125, 106346.
[4]. Principles for Responsible Investment. (2021) https://www.unpri.org/
[5]. Edmans, A. (2023). The end of ESG. Financial Management, 52(1), 3-17.
[6]. IFRS (2023). IFRS S1 General requirements for Disclosure of sustainability-related Financial information. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/
[7]. Arribas, I., Espinós-Vaño, M. D., García, F., & Tamosiuniene, R. (2019). Negative Screening and Sustainable Portfolio Diversification. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1566-1586.
[8]. Economic Policy Institute. (2019). The role of local government in protecting workers’ rights: A comprehensive overview of the ways that cities, counties, and other localities are taking action on behalf of working people. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-role-of-local-government-in-protecting-workers-rights-a-comprehensive-overview-of-the-ways-that-cities-counties-and-other-localities-are-taking-action-on-behalf-of-working-people/
[9]. Shimbar, A. (2021). Environment-related stranded assets: An agenda for research into value destruction within carbon-intensive sectors in response to environmental concerns. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111010.
[10]. The Guardian. (2014). Apple under fire again for working conditions at Chinese factories. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/19/apple-under-fire-again-for-working-conditions-at-chinese-factories
[11]. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and "the corporate objective revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
[12]. Tarraf, H. (2012). Exploring the Relationship Among Corporate Governance, Risk Taking and Financial Performance During The 2007–2008 Financial Crisis: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies.
[13]. Reboredo, J. C., & Ugolini, A. (2022). Climate transition risk, profitability and stock prices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102271.
[14]. Zhang, D. Y. (2022). Are firms motivated to greenwash by financial constraints? Evidence from global firms' data. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33(3), 459-479.
[15]. Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and Undue Modesty in Corporate Sustainability Disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705-723.
[16]. GRI - Standards. (2022). https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
[17]. SASB. (2023). Exploring materiality - SASB. https://sasb.org/standards/materiality-map/
[18]. Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
[19]. Lisin, A., Kushnir, A., Koryakov, A. G., Fomenko, N., & Shchukina, T. (2022). Financial Stability in Companies with High ESG Scores: Evidence from North America Using the Ohlson O-Score. Sustainability, 14(1), 479.
[20]. Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680.
[21]. Somefun, K., Perchet, R., Yin, C. Y., & de Carvalho, R. L. (2023). Allocating to Thematic Investments. Financial Analysts Journal, 79(1), 18-36.
Cite this article
Liu,J. (2024). Dilemma of ESG Development: Investors’ Perspectives. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,74,209-215.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).