
Advantages of the Decentralized Sharing Economy - Take Ethereum Platform as an Example
- 1 Department of Liberal Study, New York University, New York,10012, United States
- 2 Tepper school of business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,15213, United States
- 3 Annie Wright School, Tacoma,98403, United States
- 4 Nanjing Foreign Language Xianlin School, Nanjing,210023, China
- 5 Nanjing Foreign Language Xianlin School, Nanjing,210023, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In this era of rapid development of online transactions and platform economies, many companies operate as intermediaries between Party A and Party B in transactions and gain profits from every transaction. The "middleman", that is, the intermediary, mainly introduces Party A's resources in the form of a platform and allows more users to see and understand Party A's resource information. Platform users, that is, Party B, can save them from searching for the resources they want during the intermediary's promotion and introduction. time cost; however, some intermediaries take advantage of the process of transferring Party B's money to Party A as an intermediary and use some unfair means to obtain profits that exceed their original gains in the transaction as an intermediary, thus causing information between Party A and Party B. Asymmetry creates ambiguity, leading to serious problems in transactions. In this work, we will discuss the advantages of the decentralized sharing economy. Furthermore, this paper will focus on analyzing the shortcomings of intermediary operations in contemporary society from the perspective that intermediaries need to spend a lot of time and economic costs to establish credibility, the lack of intermediaries which are controlled artificially, and the friction of platform p2p transactions. Targeting the above three aspects, the paper will also explain and analyze the operating model of Ethereum to demonstrate that Ethereum is a better online transaction model that can replace the artificial intermediary model in contemporary times.
Keywords
Ethereum, decentralization, middleman, sharing & platform economy, blockchain
[1]. Coyle, D., & O’Connor, S. Understanding the Sharing Economy (No. ESCoE DP-2019-04). Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
[2]. Tetřevová, L., & Kolmašová, P. B2B sharing as part of the sharing economy model. Hradec economic days, Vol. 11 (1).
[3]. Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M.. Defining the sharing economy for sustainability. Sustainability, 11(3), 567
[4]. Gollapudi, S., Kollias, K., & Panigrahi, D. You get what you share: Incentives for a sharing economy. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp.).
[5]. Kim, J., Yoon, Y., & Zo, H. Why people participate in the sharing economy: A social exchange perspective.
[6]. Grondys, K. Implementation of the Sharing Economy in the B2B Sector. Sustainability, 11(14), 3976.
[7]. Chuah, S. H. W., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Cheng, C. F. Factors influencing the adoption of sharing economy in B2B context in China: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105892.
[8]. Wang, L. Research on the Influencing Factors of Business Mode Innovation in the Context of Sharing Economy Setting Didi Travel as an Example. In 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) (pp. 1757-1762). Atlantis Press.
[9]. Zou, Jie. Communication, Identity and Trust: Research on Internet Second-Landlord under the Empowerment of New Media. Journalism and Communications, 10, 174.
[10]. Mei Yan,Wang Si Yang. A comparative analysis of the business models of Uber and Didi Chuxing -- from the perspective of sharing economy. Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University. Vol.19 Num.2
[11]. Yang, Z., Lei, H., & Qian, W. A hybrid formal verification system in coq for ensuring the reliability and security of ethereum-based service smart contracts. IEEE Access, 8, 21411-21436.
[12]. Dika, A., & Nowostawski, M. (2018, July). Security vulnerabilities in ethereum smart contracts. In 2018 IEEE international conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE green computing and communications (GreenCom) and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) (pp. 955-962). IEEE.
[13]. Kfoury, E. F., & Khoury, D. J. Secure end-to-end VoIP system based on Ethereum Blockchain. Journal of Communications, 450–455. https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.13.8.450-455
[14]. Shin, D. D. H. Blockchain: The Emerging Technology of Digital Trust. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101278
[15]. Ante, L., & Saggu, A.Time-Varying Bidirectional Causal Relationships between Transaction Fees and Economic Activity of Subsystems Utilizing the Ethereum Blockchain Network. Available at SSRN 4400040.
[16]. Becker, M., & Bodó, B. Trust in blockchain-based systems. Internet Policy Review, 10(2), 1-10.
[17]. Robinson, P.Using ethereum registration authorities to establish trust for ethereum private sidechains. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 1(2).
[18]. Yusoff, J., Mohamad, Z., & Anuar, M. A Review: Consensus Algorithms on
[19]. The Decentralized Global Credit Protocol. Goldfinch. (n.d.). https://goldfinch.finance/
[20]. Ethereum: a next generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Vitalik Buterin. Ethereum.org
[21]. He, S. Impact of Blockchain Applications on Trust in Business. iBusiness, 12(3), 103-112.
[22]. Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). ethereum.org. (n.d.). https://ethereum.org/zh/developers/docs/evm/
Cite this article
Hu,Q.;Huang,Y.;Chen,Y.;Zheng,B.;Zhu,Y. (2024). Advantages of the Decentralized Sharing Economy - Take Ethereum Platform as an Example. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,97,331-342.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).