Research Article
Open access
Published on 14 August 2024
Download pdf
Liu,Y.;Pei,R.;Kang,Z. (2024). Transnational Analysis of ESG Information Disclosure: Environmental Concerns among Listed Companies in China and the United States. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,81,19-28.
Export citation

Transnational Analysis of ESG Information Disclosure: Environmental Concerns among Listed Companies in China and the United States

Yuyang Liu 1, Ruimin Pei 2, Ziyuan Kang *,3,
  • 1 Wuhan Britain-China School
  • 2 Northeastern University
  • 3 New York University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/81/20241373

Abstract

This research provides a transnational analysis of the environmental concerns embedded within the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) information disclosure practices of listed companies in China and the United States. By examining 10 representative firms from each country, the study aims to highlight the variances in environmental awareness and subsequent actions undertaken by entities in these two major economies. However, as some argue, “Nonpecuniary factors, such as ESG considerations, should never take precedence over investment returns, risk or lowering fees”. Despite this perspective, our investigation adopts a cross-border lens, offering a more holistic perspective. The primary methodological tools involve evaluating ESG report ratings based on MSCI scoring rules and analyzing word frequencies related to environmental topics in Q4 2022 conference call transcripts. Preliminary findings indicate that the predictive effect of the MSCI score does not significantly differ between the two regions, and the attention to environmental issues, as evidenced by word frequencies, is comparable. The study acknowledges limitations arising from the limited dataset and the temporal scope of the research. Nevertheless, this research presents significant implications for international ESG policymaking, potentially guiding more effective strategies to attain Sustainable Development Goals. It also suggests avenues for further research, particularly in expanding the dataset and refining keyword sentiment analysis methodologies.

Keywords

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), Environmental Concerns, MSCI Score, Transnational Analysis, Sustainable Development Goals

[1]. Kiser, C., Leipziger, D., & Shubert, J. J. (2014). Creating Social Value: A Guide for Leaders and Change Makers (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351276283

[2]. Hooda, S. (2017). How to Engage Investors for Long-Term Value Creation. Directorship, 56–.

[3]. KPMG. (2019, September). Impact of ESG disclosures - Embracing the Future. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/09/impact-of-esg-disclosures.pdf

[4]. Venkateshwaran, S. (2023, March 20). ESG Reporting in an Increasingly Volatile World – Relevance and Evolution. ETEnergyworld.com. https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/esg-reporting-in-an-increasingly-volatile-world-relevance-and-evolution/98803723

[5]. MSCI ESG Research LLC. (2023, July). ESG Ratings Process. https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/34424357/MSCI+ESG+Ratings+Methodology+-+Process.pdf/820e4152-4804-fe33-0a67-8ee4c6a8fd7d?t=1666182600771

[6]. Eckerle, K., Tomlinson, B., & Whelan, T. (2020, June 19). ESG and the earnings call: Communicating Sustainable Value Creation quarter by quarter. SSRN. https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=991004073021021078091005067096085091096025095076029067119000122024068080005000006072121042119015047112061082126071119015064012119066064011050071073029098115019001099046054032120004084116093022093098031074119102082006071087083103006095006015085066098127&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE

[7]. Liu, Y., Heinberg, M., Huang, X., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2023). Building a competitive advantage based on transparency: When and why does transparency matter for corporate social responsibility? Business Horizons, 66(4), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.004

[8]. Bax, K., Bonaccolto, G., & Paterlini, S. (2023). Do lower environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rated companies have higher systemic impact? Empirical evidence from Europe and the United States. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1406–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2427

[9]. Chuang, S.-P., & Huang, S.-J. (2018). The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x

Cite this article

Liu,Y.;Pei,R.;Kang,Z. (2024). Transnational Analysis of ESG Information Disclosure: Environmental Concerns among Listed Companies in China and the United States. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,81,19-28.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

Conference website: https://www.confbps.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-421-7(Print) / 978-1-83558-422-4(Online)
Conference date: 27 February 2024
Editor:Arman Eshraghi
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.81
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).