Download pdf
The Impact of Investor Psychology on Investment Decisions
- 1 Department of Finance, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Caolu Town, Shanghai, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This article aims to explore the significant impact of investor psychology on investment decisions, taking overconfidence and risk tolerance theories as examples to analyze their influence on decision-making. The examination of the investment psychology during the China’s 2018 A-share crash highlights that investors are susceptible to psychological biases and emotional reactions in the face of market changes. These biases include representativeness bias, where investors may rely too heavily on stereotypes, leading to misjudgments; panic, which can trigger impulsive and irrational selling; overconfidence, causing investors to overestimate their abilities and knowledge; and catastrophic thinking, where investors focus excessively on potential worst-case outcomes. These psychological factors contribute to increased market volatility and can lead to irrational judgments and behaviors among investors. Such behavior is detrimental to the market's stable development, as it can result in mispricing of assets and increased risk of misinvestment. The article emphasizes the critical role of investor psychology in rational decision-making and market efficiency. By recognizing the personal and environmental drivers of these biases, investors can adopt strategies to counteract their influence. This includes improving self-awareness, seeking a variety of perspectives, and employing tools to regulate emotional reactions to market shifts. Policymakers can further contribute by fostering market transparency and educating investors, which can diminish the impact of psychological biases on investment choices. In conclusion, a concerted effort to comprehend and tackle investor psychology is essential for cultivating a more stable and efficient investment landscape.
Keywords
Investor psychology. Investment decisions. Risk tolerance. Market volatility. Psychological biases
[1]. Shefrin, H. Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2000
[2]. Adiputra, I. G. The Influence of Overconfidence, Representative Bias, and Risk Tolerance in Investment Decision Making: Evidence on Stock Investors in Indonesia. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 2021, 48(4).
[3]. Roszkowski, M. J., Snelbecker, G. E., & Leiberg, J. (1993) The impact of framing on risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 9(3), 237-246.
[4]. Jin, Y. (2019). Will the A-shares rise in 2019? Financial Weekly.
[5]. Dong, Y. A., & Wu, Y. F. (2020) Equity concentration, media reporting, and the risk of stock price crashes: Empirical evidence from the A-shares between 2014 and 2018. Friends of Accounting, (19), 8.
[6]. Chen, G. Y. (2017) Discussing psychological biases in investment. Sichuan Provincial Affairs, (4), 1.
[7]. Wu, J.-T., & Yuan, Z.-J. (2019) The relationship between investor sentiment, macroeconomic factors, and the returns of China's A-shares. Innovation and Management, 15(1), 1-28.
[8]. Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. W. (1998) Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-+.
[9]. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003) A survey of behavioral finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (pp. 1053-1128). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
[10]. Shefrin, H. (2002) Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Shiller, R. J. (2000) Measuring bubble expectations and investor confidence. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 49-60.
[12]. Odean, T. (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
[13]. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92.
[14]. Barberis, Nicholas, and Richard Thaler. "A survey of behavioral finance." Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1 (2003): 1053-1128.
[15]. Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. W. (1998) Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-+.
[16]. Odean, T. (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775-1798.
[17]. Shiller, R. J. (2000) Measuring bubble expectations and investor confidence. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 49-60.
[18]. Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998) Investor psychology and security market under‐and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839-1885.
[19]. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92.
[20]. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007) Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-151.
Cite this article
Xie,J. (2024). The Impact of Investor Psychology on Investment Decisions. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,114,101-109.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICEMGD 2024 Workshop: Innovative Strategies in Microeconomic Business Management
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).