Download pdf
Study on the Indirect Effect Mechanism of Supply Chain Governance on Firm Performance
- 1 School of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper constructs a theoretical model on the influence mechanism of supply chain governance on firm performance, with information sharing, supplier trust and supply chain integration as intermediary variables and government support as moderating variables. Taking enterprises in Sichuan Province as the investigation objects, this paper empirically studies the relationships among supply chain governance, information sharing, supplier trust, supply chain integration, firm performance, and government support by means of questionnaire survey. The results show that supply chain governance has significant positive effects on information sharing, supplier trust, supply chain integration and firm performance. Government support plays a positive moderate role between supply chain governance and supply chain integration. Supply chain governance will indirectly affect enterprise performance through information sharing, supplier trust and supply chain integration, and the indirect effect is stronger than the direct effect. This indicates that enterprises should standardize supply chain governance, share information efficiently with partners, form a good trust relationship with suppliers, and promote a series of supply chain integration, so as to improve the overall performance of enterprises.
Keywords
supply chain governance, information sharing, supplier trust, supply chain integration and government support, firm performance
[1]. Li J Q, Sikora R, Shaw M J, et al. A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2006,42(1):251-2.
[2]. Gao J, Lee J D, Zhang Y. A dynamic model of interaction between reliance on automation and cooperation in multi-operator multi-automation situations[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2006,36 (5):511-526.
[3]. LEE H L,WHANG S. Information Sharing in a Supply Chain[J].International Journal of Technology Management, 2000, 20(3) :373-387.
[4]. Morgan R.M., Hunt S.D. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing,1994,58(3): 20-38.
[5]. McAllister, Daniel J. “Affect - and Cognition - based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 1995,38 ( 1), pp. 24.
[6]. Mayer, R., Davis, J. and Schoorman, F. ”An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, Academy of Management Review, 1995,20 (3), pp.709~34.
[7]. Ganesan, S. “Determinants of Long- term Orientation in Buyer- Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 1994,58 ( April) , pp.1~8.
[8]. Doney, P. M. and Cannon, J. P. ”An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer- Seller Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 1997,61( April) , pp.35~51.
[9]. Zhao X, Huo B, Flynn B B, et al. The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2008, 26(3): 368-388.
[10]. Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei J C. Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(6): 1199-1216.
[11]. Flynn B B, Huo B, Zhao X. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2010, 28(1): 58-7
[12]. Eckerd S,Sweeney K. The role of dependence and information sharing on governance decisions regarding conflict[J].The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2018, 29(1):409-434.
[13]. Ferguson J R ,Paulin M ,Möslein K , et al. Relational governance, communication and the performance of biotechnology partnerships[J].Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2005, 12(3):395-408.
Cite this article
Yuan,J. (2024).Study on the Indirect Effect Mechanism of Supply Chain Governance on Firm Performance.Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,124,64-77.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).