The Comparative Study on Bank Performance of BOCD and PNC
- 1 Nanjing Audit University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Global economic growth is decelerating by mid-2024, challenged by geopolitical uncertainty, inflation, and central bank interest rate hikes. Emerging markets strive for growth amid global labor skill mismatches and digital transformation, raising employment issues. International trade adjusts to political shifts, and climate policies drive economic change. The global economy faces critical challenges and opportunities, demanding vigilance and adaptability from policymakers and market participants. This study analyzes accounting data from the Bank of Chengdu (BOCD) and PNC Financial Services (PNC) from 2013 to 2022, comparing financial status and performance. PNC shows larger size, higher revenues, profits, EPS, and superior loan performance, while BOCD exhibits higher earnings growth, stronger profitability, and promising future performance. The paper aims to compare the business structure and profitability of U.S. and Chinese financial institutions within the same global economic context but different economic systems, excluding international visibility and trust effects.
Keywords
Financial institution, Slowdown in global economic growth, Comparison
[1]. Liu, J., & Li, C. (2016). National audit in the process of national governance modernization: Institutional guarantees and practical logic. Social Sciences in China, 37(4), 5-21.
[2]. Fenghua, P., Ziyun, H., Sigler, T., & others. (2018). How Chinese financial centers integrate into global financial center networks: An empirical study based on overseas expansion of Chinese financial service firms. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(2), 217-230.
[3]. Yu, Y., & Du, X. (2011). Analysis of accounting information distortion of SMEs in China. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Business Management and Electronic Information (BMEI 2011) (Vol. 2, pp. 836-839).
[4]. The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (2024). Balance sheet.
[5]. Yin, Z., & Wang, J. (2020). The framework, key points, and measures of regulatory oversight for financial holding companies in the United States. Financial Regulatory Research, (4), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.13490/j.cnki.frr.2020.04.007
[6]. Bank of Chengdu Co., Ltd. (2024). Balance sheet.
[7]. Anonymous. (2008). Pinnacle Digest: Earnings per share announcement spurs progressive review. M2 Presswire.
[8]. Ajayi, O. A. (2024). Implementing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Principles in Organizations: The Role of Leadership and Impacts on Corporate Financial Performance (Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University).
Cite this article
Yang,Y. (2025). The Comparative Study on Bank Performance of BOCD and PNC. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,163,188-193.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).