
Which Photographic Features of Product Images Impact Consumer Attractiveness?
- 1 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, McMaster University, Canada
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The determinants influencing online shopping decisions have long been a focal point of interest for both business practitioners and academic researchers. Among these factors, product imagery stands out as a critical element. However, there remains a notable research gap in understanding the specific features of product images that significantly impact consumers' purchasing decisions in the online context. While the role of product imagery is acknowledged, further investigation is needed to identify which particular aspects of these images are most influential in shaping consumer decision-making processes. The majority of previous research about product images used survey-based methods to measure image quality based on interviewee’s satisfaction and rating instead of data-based analysis. Hence, this research paper aims to investigate the relationship between product photography and customer attractiveness on e-commerce platforms by exploring what photographic characteristics could contribute to better designing product images that captivate consumers and ultimately enhance sales. Additionally, this study aims to explore potential differences in purchasing behavior between male and female consumers, providing a complementary dimension to the research findings. The analysis is conducted using data-driven methodologies, with a specific focus on key features of product images. These include aesthetic appeal, embedded messaging, and social presence, all of which are central to the investigation's scope. The author collects data through a crawler tool and organizes it into a raw dataset (both for males and females). Next, image-processing techniques and feature engineering are applied to conduct the final dataset used for linear regression. Then, backward elimination contributes to determining the best-performed linear regression model, which illustrates the photographic features which are significant to the impingement of sales numbers. As a result, it is confirmed that male clients are more affected by the amount of information contained and the proportion of the products in the product image. In contrast, female clients take notice of the appearance of human models.
Keywords
Image-processing, Machine Learning, Product Photography, Consumer Behavior, E-Commerce
[1]. Li, X., Wang, M., & Chen, Y. (2014). The impact of product photo on online consumer purchase intention: An image-processing enabled empirical study. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2014).
[2]. Bruce, M., & Whitehead, M. (1988). Putting design into the picture-the role of product design in consumer purchase behavior. Journal of the Market Research Society, 30(2), 147-162.
[3]. Halim, P., Swasto, B., Hamid, D., & Firdaus, M. R. (2014). The influence of product quality, brand image, and quality of service to customer trust and implication on customer loyalty (Survey on customer brand Sharp electronics product at the South Kalimantan Province). European Journal of Business and Management, 6(29), 159–166.
[4]. Bhatti, A., Akram, H., Basit, H. M., Khan, A., Mahwish, S., Naqvi, R., & Bilal, M. (2020). E-commerce trends during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(2), 1449–1452.
[5]. Higueras-Castillo, E., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., & Villarejo-Ramos, Á. F. (2023). Intention to use e-commerce vs physical shopping: Difference between consumers in the post-COVID era. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113622.
[6]. Kretova, A. (2013). Product photography for an online store and a printed catalog (Bachelor's thesis, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences). Theseus. Retrieved from https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/67569
[7]. Lee, S. J., & Kim, E. S. (2003). Clothing products evaluation according to self-image and clothing attitudes. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(12), 1424–1433.
[8]. Nagashima, A. (1977). A comparative "made in" product image survey among Japanese businessmen. The Journal of Marketing, 41(3), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250298.
[9]. Szulc, R., & Musielak, K. (2023). Product photography in product attractiveness perception and e-commerce customer purchase decisions. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2023(166), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2022.166.49.
Cite this article
Yang,X. (2025). Which Photographic Features of Product Images Impact Consumer Attractiveness?. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,168,83-91.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).