
OFDI and Global Value Chain Reconstruction under the “Belt and Road” Initiative
- 1 Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Guo ding Road, Shanghai, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The global industrial structure is accelerating its transformation, and global value chains are being restructured under the differentiation of trade systems and investment. This paper discusses the impact of OFDI on GVC restructuring under the “Belt and Road” initiative, aiming to analyze the resource reallocation of Chinese enterprises in the global market and its role in value chain upgrading. This paper finds that OFDI can significantly increase the degree of GVC embeddedness of enterprises, in which technological innovation, vertical integration adjustment, specialization and industrial chain integration are important mechanisms affecting the upgrading of GVC. The moderating effect of “Belt and Road” is weakly negatively correlated, but the trade facilitation, digital infrastructure improvement and financial support it promotes provide long-term development momentum for enterprise GVC embeddedness. Meanwhile, private firms, manufacturing firms, and non-asset-intensive firms are more likely to benefit from OFDI and enhance GVC embeddedness.
Keywords
Belt and Road Initiative, outward foreign direct investment, global value chain
[1]. Su, D., Sheng, B., Shao, C., & Chen, S. (2020). Global value chain, industry agglomeration and firm productivity’s interactive effect. Economic Research Journal, 55(3), 100-115.
[2]. Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2021). Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID-19 pandemic and the international division of labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 1215-1224.
[3]. Niu, Z. W., Zou, Z. X., & Wei, P. D. (2020). The Development of Global Value Chain and Strategic Choice of Chinese Industries’ Dual Circulation. Reform, 12, 28-47.
[4]. Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of international Economics, 54(1), 75-96.
[5]. Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2014). Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. American economic review, 104(2), 459-494.
[6]. Qiao, X. Y., Li, X. Y., & Zhu, H. L. (2024). Study on the Effect of Trade Frictions against China on the Restructuring of Global Value Chains under the New Pattern of Dual Circulation. Management Review, 36(02), 27-39.
[7]. Qi, J. H., Zhang, Z. T., & Zhao, W. K. (2024). Robot Adoption and Outward Industrial Transfer in OFDI Patterns:A Discussion on the Impact of “Binary Paradox” in Industrial Chains. China Industrial Economics, (06), 61-79.
[8]. Zhang, B., Yang, L. (2024). The Impact of Industrial Relocation on the Resilience of China's Industrial Chain—From the Perspective of Vertical Industrial Linkages. Journal of International Trade, (08), 1-18.
[9]. SONG, Y. J., & FANG, H. (2022). Research on the Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on the Global Value Chain Quality of Home Country. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (5), 101.
[10]. Liu, Y. D., Liu, H. Z. (2021). How Does China's OFDI Reconstruct Global Value Chain:An Empirical Analysis Based on Binary Margin. International Economics and Trade Research, (11), 20-36.
[11]. Song, Y., Wang M., & Wang, J. (2023). Outward Foreign Direct Investment and Reconstructing Global Value Chain in Chinese Firms: Based on the Perspective of Firm Capability. Industrial Economic Review, (03), 51-69.
[12]. Liang, Q. Y., Lv, T., & Huang, A. P. (2024) Study on the Regional Value Chain Reconstruction Effect of China's Direct Investment in RCEP Member Countries. Journal of Commercial Economics, (05), 139-143.
[13]. Magee, C. S. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(2), 349-362.
[14]. Kong, Q., & Dong, H. (2015). Trade facilitation and trade potential of countries along “One Belt One Road” route. Journal of International Trade, 12, 158-168.
[15]. Dai, X., Yang, S. Z. (2020). Foreign Trade Promotion Effect of China's “Belt and Road” Initiative. Economist, (06), 68-76.
[16]. Lu, S. F., Dong, R. Y., & Ye, C. S. (2021). Does “the Belt and Road Initiative” Promote High-quality Exports—Evidence from Firms in China. China Industrial Economics, (03), 80-98.
[17]. Cao, Y. F., Deng, Z. B., & Wen, J. X. (2024). The Impact of Digital Trade Facilitation on Global Value Chain Upgrading:Empirical Evidence from Belt and Road Countries. East China Economic Management, 38(06), 56-65.
[18]. Bair, J. (2005). Global capitalism and commodity chains: looking back, going forward. Competition & Change, 9(2), 153-180.
[19]. Zhang, X. X.(2020). A Research on Countermeasures for Value Chain Upgrading in China—From the Perspective of “Dual Circulation” Development. Fujian Tribune, (11), 49-59.
[20]. Yang, Z. H., & Sun, X. N. (2024). New Trends in Global Supply Chain Patterns and Strategic Considerations for China. China Business and Market, 38(02), 46-56.
[21]. Lv, Y., Luo, W., & Liu, B. (2015). Heterogeneous Firms and Global Value Chain Embedding: An Efficiency and Financing-Based Perspective. The Journal of World Economy, (08), 29-55.
[22]. Wang, G. J., & Lu, X. X. (2019). The belt and road initiative and the upgrading of China’s enterprises. China Industrial Economics, 3, 43-61.
Cite this article
Wu,X. (2025). OFDI and Global Value Chain Reconstruction under the “Belt and Road” Initiative. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,173,31-40.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).