
Behavioural Bias and Strategic Response: Focusing on Scenario-Based Responses to Overconfidence and Herd Effect in Individual Investors
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Behavioral finance suggests that overconfidence leads investors to overestimate their capabilities and misjudge market noise; the herd effect triggers group irrationality through social media emotional contagion, exacerbating decision-making failures. This study explores the decision-making bias of individual investors due to overconfidence and herd effect in retail-dominated markets, analyses its mechanism of action, and proposes non-quantitative intervention tools. This paper reviews a lightweight toolkit: a cognitive self-assessment scale enforcing pre-trade answers to core risk questions reduces average LUNA event losses by 52%; an emotional firewall that monitors social platform buzzwords and triggers a cooling-off period improves measured trade cancellation rates by 72%; and a decision review template comparing buy rationale with actual results reduces repeat error rates by 61%. The toolkit significantly reduces the frequency and volatility of irrational trades (28% annualized reduction). The research constructs a ‘cognitive-emotional-behavioral’ three-stage intervention model, which transforms behavioral finance theory into a practical decision-blocking tool, providing investors with self-help solutions and regulators with a basis for optimizing market regulations.
Keywords
Behavioral finance, Overconfidence, Herd effect, Cognitive bias, Behavioral modification tools
[1]. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2021). Report on Equity and Options Market Structure Conditions in Early 2021. Retrieved from [https://www.sec.gov/files/staff-report-equity-options-market-struction-conditions-early-2021.pdf]
[2]. Barberis, N. (2018). Behavioral Finance: Psychology, Decision-Making, and Markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(1), 13-72.
[3]. Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational Exuberance (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
[4]. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138.
[5]. Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2018). A Crisis of Beliefs: Investor Psychology and Financial Fragility. Princeton University Press.
[6]. CoinGecko. (2022). UST Depegging Incident Analysis Report. Retrieved from[https://www.coingecko.com/research/publications/ust-depegging-analysis ]
[7]. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291
[8]. Shiller, R. J. (2019). Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events. Princeton University Press.
[9]. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Cite this article
Ding,Y. (2025). Behavioural Bias and Strategic Response: Focusing on Scenario-Based Responses to Overconfidence and Herd Effect in Individual Investors. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,178,56-60.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).