Download pdf
The Impact of ESG Performance on Financial Constraints
- 1 Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The global transition toward carbon neutrality has amplified the role of green finance, with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance becoming a critical determinant of corporate financing decisions. In China—the largest emerging market and carbon emitter—recent policy innovations, such as green finance pilot zones and carbon emission reduction instruments, have accelerated ESG adoption. However, existing studies predominantly focus on linear ESG-financing relationships, overlooking nonlinear mechanisms, regional policy synergies, and technological disruptions like blockchain. This study examines the impact of ESG performance on financing constraints using panel data from Chinese A-share listed firms (2010–2020). Employing a progressive modeling framework (POLS→OLS→FE→two-way FE), it systematically address endogeneity through financial controls, fixed effects, and robustness checks with alternative ESG metrics. Heterogeneity analyses reveal attenuated ESG effects in environmentally sensitive industries (β=-0.161 vs. -0.294) and state-owned enterprises (β=-0.106 vs. -0.323), attributable to regulatory compliance costs and soft budget constraints. The findings support the ESG signaling framework wherein enhanced disclosure reduces information asymmetry. Policy implications emphasize standardized ESG disclosure aligned with China-specific materiality and differentiated regulatory interventions across industries and ownership types.
Keywords
ESG Performance, Financing Constraints, Emerging Market
[1]. Bae, K. H., Ghoul, S. E., & Zheng, Y. (2023). ESG performance and bank lending decisions: Evidence from global syndicated loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 147, 107013.
[2]. Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Su, B. (2024). Can green finance policy promote green innovation in cities? Evidence from pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 355, 120487.
[3]. Hsu, P.-H., Liang, H., & Matos, P. (2021). ESG rating divergence and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(3), 1125–1155.
[4]. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889.
[5]. Tang, D., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Do carbon disclosures matter? Evidence from the green bond market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, 102801.
[6]. Marquis, C., & Bird, Y. (2023). The fragmentation of ESG ratings and its consequences. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 345–367.
[7]. Lei, Z., & Yu, X. (2023). Green finance policy and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China’s pilot zones. Energy Economics, 126, 106915.
[8]. Chen, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The hidden cost of ESG compliance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(3), 456–475.
[9]. Ma,D.,He,Y., & Zeng,L.Can green finance improve the ESG performance? Evidence from green credit policy in China. Energy Economics,2024,107772.
[10]. Heutel, G. (2022). Optimal policy rules for climate change when adaptation and mitigation are complements.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 111, 102591.
[11]. Huang, J., Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). ESG investment, green innovation, and corporate financing costs: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122289.
[12]. People’s Bank of China, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, National Financial Regulatory Administration, & China Securities Regulatory Commission. (2023). Guidelines on leveraging green finance to support the construction of a Beautiful China. Official Policy Document No. 2023-12.
[13]. Deng, X., Li, W., & Ren, X. (2023). ESG performance and litigation risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 78, 102365.
[14]. Zhou, X., & Huang, M. (2023). Green credit and ESG: Evidence from China [Preprint]. SSRN.
[15]. Wang, C., Zhang, Q., & Zhou, X. (2023). Blockchain-enabled ESG transparency: A game-changer for green finance? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122412.
[16]. Liu, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, L. (2023). Localizing ESG ratings in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 81, 102335.
[17]. Xue, R., Zhang, H., & Li, Y. (2022). Regional heterogeneity in ESG policy effectiveness. China Economic Review, 75, 101843.
[18]. Li, M., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Environmental regulation and ESG-driven innovation: Evidence from China’s carbon neutrality policy. Energy Policy, 174, 113401
[19]. Kalcheva, I., & Lins, K. V. (2007). International evidence on cash holdings and expected managerial agency problems. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(4), 1087–1112.
[20]. Bennedsen, M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2020). Do CEOs matter? Evidence from hospitalization events. Journal of Finance, 75(4), 1877-1911.
[21]. Gormley, T. A., & Matsa, D. A. (2014). Common errors: How to (and not to) control for unobserved heterogeneity. Review of Financial Studies, 27(2), 617-661.
[22]. Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693–714.
[23]. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review. 48(2), 147–160.
[24]. Almeida, H., Campello, M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2004). The cash flow sensitivity of cash. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1777–1804.
[25]. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. *Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
[26]. Dang, V. A., Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2015). In search of robust methods for dynamic panel data models in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53, 84–98.
[27]. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
[28]. Chen, Z., Li, W.,& Lin, Y.(2018). Policy burdens, firm performance, and management turnover. China Economic Review, 50,1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.03.001
[29]. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.001
[30]. Lin, C., Liu, S., & Shi, K. (2020). State-owned enterprise reform in China: Past, present and prospects. International Review of Financial Analysis, 72, 101561.
[31]. Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–334.
[32]. Cheng, W., Li, C., & Wang, H. (2023). State ownership and ESG performance: Evidence from China’s green bond market. China Economic Review, 85, 101845.
[33]. European Commission. (2020). EU taxonomy for sustainable activities. Official Journal of the European Union, L 198, 13-43.
Cite this article
Lin,F. (2025). The Impact of ESG Performance on Financial Constraints. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,180,82-95.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).