1. Introduction
In recent years, blockchain technology and digital assets have shifted from niche interest to mainstream adoption. As a result, cryptocurrency exchanges have become essential intermediaries in this evolving financial ecosystem. Coinbase, established in 2012, has risen to prominence as a secure and compliant trading platform for both retail and institutional investors. As of 2023, the platform boasts over 110 million verified users and billions in daily trading volume, underscoring its influence in the market [1]. The company was listed on Nasdaq in 2021 under the ticker COIN, marking a major milestone for the entire crypto sector [2]. Coinbase’s model of operating transparently and legally has made it a preferred choice for regulators and investors alike.
The global cryptocurrency market capitalization surpassed $2 trillion in 2021, demonstrating a fast-growing demand for digital assets [3]. As this sector expands, it becomes increasingly vital to examine the governance and structure of exchanges like Coinbase. While Coinbase’s success demonstrates the potential of compliant exchange models, the industry also faces critical challenges. The growth of the cryptocurrency industry is accompanied by challenges such as navigating fragmented global regulatory landscapes, competing with low-cost decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and balancing technological scalability with regulatory rigor. As a leading enterprise in this field, an in-depth exploration of Coinbase serves as the core of this paper. This paper seeks to explore Coinbase’s development model, compliance strategies, market presence, and prospects. It employs a literature review to synthesize current findings and industry data, aiming to inform stakeholders and advance research on sustainable crypto exchange models. Furthermore, the research offers a practical direction for emerging platforms to navigate global regulatory complexity while maintaining user trust.
2. Literature review
2.1. Theoretical frameworks
Digital asset platforms have evolved rapidly alongside the growth of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other tokens. These platforms now offer a range of services, including spot trading, staking, lending, and NFT integration. Research highlights that market maturity, user protection mechanisms, and legal frameworks play a decisive role in platform success [4]. Exchanges are now central to the global cryptocurrency ecosystem, not just for trading but also for providing access to DeFi services, smart contracts, and financial tools.
A platform’s ability to operate legally across jurisdictions determines its scalability and investor confidence. Regulatory compliance is linked to brand credibility and reduces operational risk [5]. Coinbase’s early emphasis on obtaining licenses in the U.S. and abroad illustrates a strategic commitment to legal clarity. As Zhao and Chen explain, exchanges that fail to meet these requirements often suffer reputational damage or outright bans, particularly in countries with strict financial surveillance laws [6].
User interface (UI), seamless onboarding, and secure transaction processes are recurring themes in literature evaluating exchange platforms. Coinbase’s simple design, coupled with real-time data tools and robust infrastructure, has earned it a competitive edge [7]. Furthermore, the integration of mobile apps, two-factor authentication, biometric logins, and educational resources contributes to a holistic user journey that drives engagement and retention.
2.2. Research gaps in existing studies on Coinbase
Numerous studies have examined the development and compliance issues of digital asset trading platforms from various perspectives. Most focus on the challenges related to risk control, market liquidity, and investor protection, while also analyzing macroeconomic influences and policy trends [8]. On one hand, with the expanding popularity of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, trading platforms have diversified into spot trading, margin trading, derivatives, and DeFi-related businesses [9]. On the other hand, regulators worldwide are increasingly enforcing policies to monitor and guide platform operations [6].
Some scholars suggest that a platform’s competitive edge lies in the dual pillars of technological innovation and user trust. Technologically, this includes high-performance matching systems, support for emerging blockchain projects, and efficient cold/hot wallet management [7]. User trust, in turn, relies on brand reputation, regulatory certifications, and robust asset protection [4]. The integration of AI and big data for anti-money laundering and KYC has also become critical for platform competitiveness [10].
Coinbase is widely recognized for its strengths in regulatory compliance and user experience. Since its inception, it has actively pursued licenses and maintained communication with governments to offer a legal and secure trading environment [5]. In terms of UX, Coinbase prioritizes simple interfaces and intuitive processes, which were crucial during the early stages of crypto adoption [11]. Additionally, its security architecture features real-time monitoring, firewalls, and custodial services to mitigate risks [12].
Overall, the literature recognizes the pivotal role of trading platforms but also emphasizes the challenges ahead, such as evolving regulations, increasing competition, and potential security threats [13]. Coinbase’s success demonstrates the value of early compliance strategies and user-centric innovation, but its limitations also reflect the uncertainties in the broader ecosystem [8]. However, most studies focus on platform features rather than the strategic implications of its business model. This study attempts to bridge that gap by integrating case-specific data with broader trends in platform development, especially in the post-IPO era.
3. Case analysis
3.1. Coinbase’s business model
Initially centered on Bitcoin trading, Coinbase has grown into a multi-service platform. It supports numerous cryptocurrencies, including Ethereum, Solana, and stablecoins like USDC. Coinbase also offers services such as Coinbase One (a subscription plan), Coinbase Prime (for institutions), and Coinbase Wallet (a decentralized storage tool). The company earns revenue through transaction fees, custodial services, staking rewards, and partnerships. As of 2024, Coinbase Custody alone manages over $100 billion in institutional assets, underscoring its diverse income structure [1].
In Q3 2023, Coinbase reported net revenue of $674 million, driven primarily by blockchain rewards, custodial fees, and interest income on stablecoins [1]. These diversified revenue sources help stabilize earnings during market downturns. Moreover, Coinbase Ventures has invested in over 300 crypto-related startups, further embedding itself within the broader ecosystem [1].
3.2. Global expansion and regulatory compliance
Coinbase holds operational licenses in the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Japan. It actively collaborates with financial regulators and participates in global policy discussions. The platform’s adherence to frameworks like the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) has enabled smoother entry into European markets. In Asia, Coinbase has launched localized services with multilingual support and regional teams in Singapore and Japan. These expansions reflect strategic localization and legal agility.
Coinbase’s listing as a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) in several European countries marks a major leap in cross-border compliance. In regions such as Latin America and Southeast Asia, Coinbase has been conducting market research and exploring partnerships with mobile payment providers. These efforts demonstrate a deliberate global outreach strategy that few competitors have achieved.
3.3. Technology and security infrastructure
Security is paramount in crypto trading. Coinbase employs cold/hot wallet segregation, AI-based fraud detection, and real-time monitoring systems. It is audited under SOC 1 and SOC 2 standards, and its insurance policy covers up to $250,000 per user, mirroring FDIC standards [1]. Furthermore, the firm invests in blockchain analytics and DeFi protocols, positioning itself at the frontier of decentralized innovation [14]. These features enhance trust and minimize risks associated with high-volume trading.
In 2022, Coinbase also acquired Unbound Security, an Israel-based firm specializing in cryptographic key management using multi-party computation (MPC) [1]. This acquisition reinforces Coinbase’s technological edge in safeguarding user funds. Additionally, the company’s use of open-source frameworks ensures code transparency and facilitates rapid development.
4. Discussion
4.1. Core competencies and strategic challenges of Coinbase
Coinbase’s success is attributable to three primary pillars, including compliance, diversification, and technology. First, its legal-first approach reduces regulatory risk and enhances brand trust. Second, its diversified revenue model—ranging from retail to institutional services—cushions it from market volatility. Third, its investment in security and infrastructure enables scalability and resilience.
However, challenges also remain. The rise of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap poses competition due to lower fees and greater user autonomy. Coinbase’s retail fees are higher, which may deter cost-sensitive users. Additionally, navigating fragmented global regulations requires substantial legal and operational resources. The company should adapt to these realities while continuing to innovate.
Coinbase’s emphasis on user trust, compliance, and innovation serves as a blueprint for other platforms. Nonetheless, its future depends on its ability to streamline costs, compete with DEXs, and sustain technological leadership. The increasing institutional interest in crypto presents new opportunities for Coinbase, especially in the realm of ETFs and regulated digital asset investment products.
4.2. Competitive landscape and differentiated positioning
To better understand Coinbase’s positioning in the global market, it is essential to compare its operations with those of other major cryptocurrency exchanges such as Binance and Kraken. Binance, for example, leads the market in daily trading volume and offers significantly lower transaction fees. It operates with a broader product offering, including futures trading and a proprietary blockchain ecosystem (BNB Chain). However, Binance has faced considerable regulatory scrutiny in several jurisdictions, including investigations by U.S. agencies, which have occasionally impacted user trust and access [15].
In contrast, Kraken is known for its conservative approach, strong security protocols, and a focus on regulatory adherence [16]. While Kraken does not match Binance in trading volume, it maintains a loyal user base due to its transparent operations and robust staking services. Compared to these two, Coinbase strikes a balance between aggressive expansion and compliance. Its status as a publicly listed U.S. company mandates regular financial disclosures and compliance with SEC regulations, lending it more legitimacy in the eyes of institutional investors.
Furthermore, Coinbase’s user-friendly interface, educational content, and regulatory credibility position it as the preferred entry point for many new retail users in the U.S. and Europe. While Binance appeals to more seasoned global traders and Kraken to security-focused users, Coinbase offers a broader appeal with simplified services supported by strategic partnerships, including integrations with Visa and Mastercard for crypto payments.
Coinbase exemplifies how a cryptocurrency exchange can build long-term success through compliance, technological innovation, and diversified services. Unlike many competitors that prioritize speed and scale over regulation, Coinbase has chosen a path that aligns more closely with institutional expectations and legal stability. This strategy has allowed it to maintain a strong reputation even amidst volatile market cycles
This comparative analysis shows that while Coinbase may not dominate in volume or product diversity, it leads to trust and regulatory reliability, two elements that are becoming increasingly crucial as the industry matures. As global regulators move toward harmonization of crypto laws, platforms like Coinbase will be instrumental in shaping the industry’s future. Looking ahead, the role of centralized exchanges will remain vital as bridges between fiat economies and decentralized ecosystems. Coinbase’s potential expansion into tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), blockchain-based identity solutions, and AI-assisted trading systems indicates it is well-positioned for the next phase of Web3.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper analyzed Coinbase’s development strategies, market behavior, and regulatory positioning. It concludes that Coinbase’s long-term viability lies in its compliance-first model, technical robustness, and diversified services. The company’s journey illustrates how centralized exchanges can maintain relevance amid decentralized trends by aligning with legal standards and user expectations.
The significance of this study lies in its ability to map Coinbase’s evolution as a benchmark for legal, secure, and scalable digital asset trading. While many studies highlight the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies, this paper emphasizes the institutional frameworks that enable growth within regulatory bounds. This paper opens the door for scholars to further examine crypto exchanges from operational, technological, and behavioral standpoints.
The company’s decision to go public has increased its transparency and access to capital but has also subjected it to heightened regulatory oversight. Navigating this space requires continuous adaptation, especially as other exchanges seek to decentralize or relocate to more lenient jurisdictions. In this context, Coinbase’s hybrid approach—balancing centralized infrastructure with elements of Web3—may serve as a model for other platforms seeking legitimacy and scale.
As cryptocurrency adoption continues to rise globally, exchanges like Coinbase will play a pivotal role not just in trading but in shaping the financial architecture of the future. The company’s investment in R&D, partnerships, and user engagement ensures that it remains at the forefront of the next wave of innovation in digital finance.
References
[1]. Investopedia. (2023) Coinbase: What It Is and How Do You Use It? https://www.investopedia.com/tech/coinbase-what-it-and-how-do-you-use-it/.
[2]. Bloomberg News. (2021) Coinbase reference price for listing is set at $250 by Nasdaq. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-13/coinbase-reference-price-for-listing-is-set-at-250-by-nasdaq.
[3]. BeInCrypto. (2021) Total crypto market cap once again breaks above $2 trillion. https://beincrypto.com/total -crypto-market-cap-once-again-breaks-above-2-trillion/
[4]. Ertz, M., & Boily, É. (2019) The rise of the digital economy: Thoughts on blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies for the collaborative economy. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(4): 84-93.
[5]. Muradyan, S. V. (2023) Digital assets: Legal regulation and estimation of risks. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(1).
[6]. Duan, K., & Urquhart, A. (2023) The instability of stablecoins. Finance Research Letters, 52: 103573.
[7]. Arnone, G. (2024) Cryptocurrency and NFT Evolution: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends and Developments. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Blockchain, London. pp. 664.
[8]. Lim, C., Wang, Y., Ren, J., & Lo, S. W. (2019) A review of fast-growing blockchain hubs in Asia. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association.2(3): 45–60.
[9]. Nakamoto, S. (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
[10]. Kim, C. Y., & Lee, K. (2018) Risk management to cryptocurrency exchange and investors guidelines to prevent potential threats. In: 2018 international conference on platform technology and service. Busan, South Korea. pp. 1-6.
[11]. Feinstein, B. D., & Werbach, K. (2021) The impact of cryptocurrency regulation on trading markets. Journal of Financial Regulation, 7(1): 48-99.
[12]. Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J., & Amaba, B. (2017) Blockchain technology innovations. In: 2017 IEEE technology & engineering management conference. Santa Clara, USA. pp. 137-141.
[13]. Harvey, C. R., Ramachandran, A., & Santoro, J. (2021) DeFi and the Future of Finance. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
[14]. Pymnts. (2023) Coinbase Commerce Partners With Chainalysis for CryptoPayments. https://www.pymnts.com/cryptocurrency/2023/coinbase-commerce-partners-with-chainalysis-for-crypto-payments
[15]. Decrypt. (2023) Binance Faces Ongoing Investigations From CFTC, SEC, DOJ, IRS. https://decrypt.co/124961/binance-ongoing-investigations-cftc-sec-doj-irs.
[16]. Investopedia. (2024) What Is Kraken? How It Works, How It Stands Out, and Issues. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/k/kraken.asp.
Cite this article
Fu,L. (2025). The Current Status and Development Trends of Coinbase. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,189,10-15.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICMRED 2025 Symposium: Effective Communication as a Powerful Management Tool
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Investopedia. (2023) Coinbase: What It Is and How Do You Use It? https://www.investopedia.com/tech/coinbase-what-it-and-how-do-you-use-it/.
[2]. Bloomberg News. (2021) Coinbase reference price for listing is set at $250 by Nasdaq. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-13/coinbase-reference-price-for-listing-is-set-at-250-by-nasdaq.
[3]. BeInCrypto. (2021) Total crypto market cap once again breaks above $2 trillion. https://beincrypto.com/total -crypto-market-cap-once-again-breaks-above-2-trillion/
[4]. Ertz, M., & Boily, É. (2019) The rise of the digital economy: Thoughts on blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies for the collaborative economy. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(4): 84-93.
[5]. Muradyan, S. V. (2023) Digital assets: Legal regulation and estimation of risks. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(1).
[6]. Duan, K., & Urquhart, A. (2023) The instability of stablecoins. Finance Research Letters, 52: 103573.
[7]. Arnone, G. (2024) Cryptocurrency and NFT Evolution: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends and Developments. In: Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Blockchain, London. pp. 664.
[8]. Lim, C., Wang, Y., Ren, J., & Lo, S. W. (2019) A review of fast-growing blockchain hubs in Asia. The Journal of the British Blockchain Association.2(3): 45–60.
[9]. Nakamoto, S. (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
[10]. Kim, C. Y., & Lee, K. (2018) Risk management to cryptocurrency exchange and investors guidelines to prevent potential threats. In: 2018 international conference on platform technology and service. Busan, South Korea. pp. 1-6.
[11]. Feinstein, B. D., & Werbach, K. (2021) The impact of cryptocurrency regulation on trading markets. Journal of Financial Regulation, 7(1): 48-99.
[12]. Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J., & Amaba, B. (2017) Blockchain technology innovations. In: 2017 IEEE technology & engineering management conference. Santa Clara, USA. pp. 137-141.
[13]. Harvey, C. R., Ramachandran, A., & Santoro, J. (2021) DeFi and the Future of Finance. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
[14]. Pymnts. (2023) Coinbase Commerce Partners With Chainalysis for CryptoPayments. https://www.pymnts.com/cryptocurrency/2023/coinbase-commerce-partners-with-chainalysis-for-crypto-payments
[15]. Decrypt. (2023) Binance Faces Ongoing Investigations From CFTC, SEC, DOJ, IRS. https://decrypt.co/124961/binance-ongoing-investigations-cftc-sec-doj-irs.
[16]. Investopedia. (2024) What Is Kraken? How It Works, How It Stands Out, and Issues. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/k/kraken.asp.