Download pdf
Gender Impact on Execution of Business Strategy
- 1 Beijing OCAHS International Academy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Gender equality has been a global debate both within the political, social and business environment. Gender equality according to most researchers have established a positive relationship with performance of organization. Furthermore, in relation to the impact gender equality has on business strategy execution, it would be argued that having gender equality enhances effective execution of business strategies. The study seeks to find out the gender impact on the execution of business strategy. This would include conducing a survey suing questionnaires from 50 women.
Keywords
gender equality, business strategy, performance
[1]. Alazzani, Abdulsamad, Ahmed Hassanein, and Yaseen Aljanadi. "Impact of gender diversity on social and environmental performance: evidence from Malaysia." Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society (2017).
[2]. Biswas, Pallab Kumar, et al. “Does Women’s Board Representation Affect Non‐managerial Gender Inequality?” Human Resource Management, vol. 60, no. 4, 2021, pp. 659–80. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22066.
[3]. Chang, Edward H. and Katherine L. Milkman. "Improving decisions that affect gender equality in the workplace." Organizational Dynamics 49.1 (2020): 100709.
[4]. Gallo, Peter, et al. “The perception of gender stereotypes in managerial positions of industrial companies.” Polish Journal of Management Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, 2021, pp. 149–64. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.09.
[5]. Humbert, Anne Laure, Elisabeth Kelan, and Marieke van den Brink. "The perils of gender beliefs for men leaders as change agents for gender equality." European Management Review 16.4 (2019): 1143-1157.
[6]. Lansu, M. I. Bleijenbergh, and Y. Benschop. "Just talking? Middle managers negotiating problem ownership in gender equality interventions." Scandinavian Journal of Management 36.2 (2020): 101110.
[7]. Ongaku, Vipul, et al. "Does Board Gender Diversity Reduce 'CEO Luck'?" Accounting & Finance, vol. 62, no. 1, 2021, pp. 243–60. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12788.
[8]. Reddy, Sudheer, and Aditya Mohan Jadhav. “Gender Diversity in Boardrooms – A Literature Review.” Cogent Economics & Finance, edited by Yogesh Pai P, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, p. 1644703. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1644703.
[9]. Scarborough, William J., Ray Sin, and Barbara Risman. "Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016." Gender & Society 33.2 (2019): 173-200.
[10]. Subašić, Emina, et al. "“We for She”: Mobilizing men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality." Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21.5 (2018): 707-724.
[11]. Sullivan, Oriel, Jonathan Gershuny, and John P. Robinson. "Stalled or uneven gender revolution? A long‐term processual framework for understanding why change is slow." Journal of Family Theory & Review 10.1 (2018): 263-279.
[12]. Tilcsik, András. “Statistical Discrimination and the Rationalization of Stereotypes.” American Sociological Review, vol. 86, no. 1, 2020, pp. 93–122. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420969399.
[13]. Tiwari, Mansi, Garima Mathur, and Suvijna Awasthi. "Gender-based discrimination faced by females at workplace: A perceptual study of working females." Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 21.3 (2018): 1-7.
[14]. Wynn, Alison T. “Pathways toward Change: Ideologies and Gender Equality in a Silicon Valley Technology Company.” Gender & Society, vol. 34, no. 1, 2019, pp. 106–30. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219876271.
Cite this article
Zhang,X. (2023). Gender Impact on Execution of Business Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,7,48-56.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).