Download pdf
Research On Management Quality of Starbucks in China's Business Expansion
- 1 Zhenhai High School
- 2 Jingling High School International Department
- 3 BPP University
- 4 Wuhan University of Science and Technology
- 5 BoRen University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper gives a general introduction of Starbucks including its scale in China, the changes of its sales in these years and use Five Forces Model to analyse the threats of Starbucks. From six aspects to show the potential risks of Starbucks. This essay also explores some problems Starbucks caused in expansion, leadership behaviour, personnel management, brand positioning. The main problems are the low-quality service, the ignoring of the individual management, bad performance of some workers and the broken end-up brand positioning respectively. The Maslow’s hierarchy of needs model is used to motivate the workers and solve the problems in expansion. The Multiple-Linkage model is divided into two parts to solve the rest problems.
Keywords
obvious behaviour, business management, Starbucks
[1]. R. Sinha, V. Ganatra, P. Pandey, DLA Deepaa, P. Arumugan, DMH. Kee, G.S. Lekha, N. Kumar, S.D. Kew, A. Dhupad, "Impact of Covid-19 on business performance: A case study of Starbucks”, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality in Asia Pacific 4(2) (2021) 13-27. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32535/ijthap.v4i2.1054.
[2]. S.P. Robbins, M.A. Coulter, Management, China Renmin University Press, 2017.
[3]. R. Perera, The PESTLE analysis. Nerdynaut, 2017.
[4]. China Daily, (2020). China's development will bring more opportunities for foreign companies. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-03/16/content_5679281.htm.
[5]. Centre for China and Organization, (2021). Latest trends in the US-China Relations: Implications for MNCs in China. http://en.ccg.org.cn/archives/74216.
[6]. S. Corporation, (2021). Starbucks Reports Q4 and Full Year Fiscal 2021 Results. https://stories.starbucks.com/press/2021/starbucks-reports-q4-and-full-year-fiscal-2021-results/.
[7]. S. Wang, Different Marketing Strategies Between Starbucks and Luckin Coffee and the Impact of the Epidemic, International Conference on Enterprise Management and Economic Development (ICEMED), Atlantis Press (2021) 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210601.001.
[8]. N. KUMAR, S. BHARDWAJ, S.E. CHU, Starbucks in China: An undisputed leader?, Asian Management Insights 7(1) (2020) 34-41.
[9]. S. Corporation, (2021). S&P Global Impact Report 2021. https://www.spglobal.com/en/who-we-are/corporate-responsibility/impact-report-2021.pdf .
[10]. Q.I.U. Lingyu, The Analysis on the Marketing Strategy of Luckin Coffee in China, 4th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2020), Atlantis Press (2020) 469-472.
[11]. G. Yukl, W.L. Gardner, Leadership in Organizations, Pearson Education, 2019.
[12]. Q. Xiaohan, Analysis of current enterprise talent recruitment problems and Countermeasures -- Taking Starbucks as an example, The Fortune Times (2015) 172-173. DOI: CNKI: SUN: ZFSD.0.2015-S2-143.
[13]. C. Ruilong, L. Junpeng, X. Zhihao, Research on Starbucks management -- from the aspects of manpower, marketing and service quality (2009) 104. DOI: http://120.106.195.12/handle/310904600Q/5662.
[14]. L. Jing, Z. Yun, A.Ries Get out of the Starbucks-style dilemma, Chinese and foreign management (05) (2011) 88-89. DOI: http: //CNKI: SUN: ZHGN.0.2011-05-037.
[15]. J.Padilla, M.Puertas, (2021). Conspicuous Consumption in Emerging Markets: The Case of Starbucks in Colombia as a Global and Sustainable Brand. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662950/full.
[16]. W. Xinhao, The midlife crisis of Starbucks, China Brand (11) (2018) 82-8. DOI: http: //CNKI: SUN: ZGPP.0.2018-11-028.
Cite this article
Fu,G.;Meng,R.;Huang,Q.;Tao,H.;Yang,L. (2023). Research On Management Quality of Starbucks in China's Business Expansion. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,9,82-89.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).