Research Article
Open access
Published on 10 November 2023
Download pdf
Xu,C. (2023). Research on the Problems and Strategies of Delegation Management in a Cross-Cultural Context —— The Case of the University of Sydney. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,35,79-84.
Export citation

Research on the Problems and Strategies of Delegation Management in a Cross-Cultural Context —— The Case of the University of Sydney

Chao Xu *,1,
  • 1 The university of Sydney

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/35/20231727

Abstract

This paper focuses on the decision of a manager or supervisor to delegate a task or responsibility to one or more employees as “delegation”, or DOA for short; It also focuses on the influence of globalization on the workplace empowerment system and proposes that a mixed cultural environment, the authority of leaders is not only based on actual ability but also on subjective cognitive decision-making. Globalization has made technological skills available to the international market, and governments and non-profit organizations need to establish cross-cultural empowerment systems to promote the growth of different groups. In this context, implementing mandates faces multiple obstacles, such as discrimination and stereotypes based on gender, race, and ethnicity. The impact of discrimination will be examined by data from the Pew Research Center’s 2019 Race in America report. This article will compare real-world case studies to weigh the pros and cons of cross-cultural empowerment. Second, make recommendations based on generally accepted views of cultural influence and individual agency. In addition, this paper also discusses the characteristics of the situational leadership model, the third culture, and Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory as its foundation. In this paper’s case study of China Europe International Business School in Shanghai, a significant conflict between different cultures occurred. Based on the situational leadership model, the third culture, and Hofstede’s theory of cultural dimensions, to solve the problems of distrust and language barriers in communication, using a third language can effectively alleviate possible conflicts.

Keywords

delegation management, cross-cultural context, problem, strategies

[1]. Lyons, P. R. (2016). Making the case for manager delegation of authority. Human Resource Management International Digest, 24(5), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-03-2016-0025

[2]. Horowitz, J., Brown, A., & Cox, K. (2019, April 9). Views on Race in America 2019. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project; Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/04/09/race-in-america-2019/

[3]. Wingfield, A. H., & Chavez, K. (2020). Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419894335

[4]. Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A. et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11, 100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

[5]. Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2

[6]. Huang, T. J. (2021). Negotiating the workplace: second-generation Asian American professionals’ early experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(11), 2477–2496. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1778455

[7]. Pellegrini, E. K. (2006). A cross -cultural investigation of the relations among organizational justice, paternalism, delegation and leader -member exchange (LMX) relationships. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

[8]. Homburg, C., Jensen, O., & Hahn, A. (2012). How to Organize Pricing? Vertical Delegation and Horizontal Dispersion of Pricing Authority. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 49–69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41714509

[9]. Xin, K., & Haijie, W. (2011, September 1). HBR Case Study: Culture Clash in the Boardroom. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/09/culture-clash-in-the-boardroom

[10]. Graen, G. B. (2006). In the Eye of the Beholder: Cross-Cultural Lesson in Leadership from Project GLOBE: A Response Viewed from the Third Culture Bonding (TCB) Model of Cross-Cultural Leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(4), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2006.23270309

Cite this article

Xu,C. (2023). Research on the Problems and Strategies of Delegation Management in a Cross-Cultural Context —— The Case of the University of Sydney. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,35,79-84.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development

Conference website: https://www.icemgd.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-091-2(Print) / 978-1-83558-092-9(Online)
Conference date: 6 August 2023
Editor:Canh Thien Dang
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.35
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).