Research Article
Open access
Published on 10 November 2023
Download pdf
Zhang,R. (2023). The Influence of Quantitative Restriction on the Quantity of Purchases under Anchoring Effect. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,38,141-146.
Export citation

The Influence of Quantitative Restriction on the Quantity of Purchases under Anchoring Effect

Ruihan Zhang *,1,
  • 1 Shenyang No.2 High School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/38/20231900

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analysis whether purchase quantity limit is an effective anchoring. Anchoring effect is a cognitive bias where individuals rely too heavily on the first piece of information they receive when making decisions. This bias has been extensively studied in the context of pricing decisions, but less attention has been paid to its effect on quantity limitations in purchasing decisions. This study uses a questionnaire to investigate how the anchoring effect affects consumers’ decisions about the quantity of a product they would purchase when faced with quantity limitations. By examining the effect of the anchoring bias on purchasing quantity limitations, the studies shed light on a relatively unexplored area of consumer behavior research. The key findings of the paper suggest that the anchoring effect influences consumers’ decisions about the quantity of a product they would purchase, and that this effect is moderated by the type of product being considered. Overall, the paper provides valuable insights into the role of the anchoring effect in purchasing decisions, and highlights the importance of considering product type when designing quantity limitations. By taking into account the anchoring effect and its moderating factors, businesses can better understand and influence consumers’ purchasing decisions, potentially leading to increased sales and revenue.

Keywords

anchoring effect, purchase quantity limit, consumption behaviour

[1]. Adrian Furnham, A., Boo, H. C.: A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35-42 (2011).

[2]. Matsumoto, A. S., Fernandes, J. L., Ferreira, I., Chagas, P. C.: Behavioral finance: a study of affect heuristic and anchoring in decision making of individual investors. Available at SSRN 2359180, (2013).

[3]. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B.: The fragile basic anchoring effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(1), 65-77 (2002).

[4]. Cervone, D.: Effects of envisioning future activities on self-efficacy judgments and motivation: An availability heuristic interpretation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 247-261 (1989).

[5]. Book, L. A., Tanford, S., Chen, Y. S.: Understanding the impact of negative and positive traveler reviews: Social influence and price anchoring effects. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 993-1007 (2016).

[6]. Strack, F., Mussweiler, T.: Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(3), 437 (1997).

[7]. Cho, I., Wesslen, R., Karduni, A., Santhanam, S., Shaikh, S., Dou, W.: The anchoring effect in decision-making with visual analytics. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), pp. 116-126 (2017).

[8]. Winkelmann, R.: Conspicuous consumption and satisfaction. Journal of economic psychology, 33(1), 183-191 (2012).

[9]. Mason, R.: Conspicuous consumption: A literature review. European journal of Marketing, 18(3), 26-39 (1984).

[10]. Lee, J., Shrum, L. J.: Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544 (2012).

Cite this article

Zhang,R. (2023). The Influence of Quantitative Restriction on the Quantity of Purchases under Anchoring Effect. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,38,141-146.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development

Conference website: https://www.icemgd.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-097-4(Print) / 978-1-83558-098-1(Online)
Conference date: 6 August 2023
Editor:Canh Thien Dang
Series: Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
Volume number: Vol.38
ISSN:2754-1169(Print) / 2754-1177(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).