Download pdf
Comparison of Three Different Companies in the US. Retail Industry Based on Beta (β-risk) Analysis and Financial Statement Analysis: Costco vs. Walmart vs. Target
- 1 University of Toronto
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capital structure, business risk (levered vs. unlevered beta β), and financial statements in the U.S. grocery retailers to determine how their unique capital structure, risks, and financial characteristics explain the differences in their performance and investment returns. We chose three U.S. grocery stores: Costco, Walmart, and Target, each with a unique business structure. We conducted a detailed beta (β) analysis, both leveraged and unleveraged, as well as a dedicate financial statement analysis focused on ratio analysis. Liquidity, profitability, and solvency abilities were examined to determine if they depend on each retailer’s specific capital structure, risks, and characteristics, and how they would affect investors’ investment decisions. Our results reveal that the capital structure, or the level of financial leverage, and size of market capitalization play key roles in determining a company’s levered and unlevered beta (β). In addition, we found that Target has the highest investment return but exhibits substantially weaker sales and has a high liquidity risk. Costco exhibits significant low margins in both gross and operating, but has a lower level of debt and a greater ability to generate free cash flow. Walmart has the largest market capitalization, the lowest business risk (β) and return, but the large amount of debts it currently holds limits its free cash flow and ability to grow rapidly. Above all, it is advisable to invest in Costco rather than Target and Walmart under today’s unprecedented (post) Covid-19 pandemic context.
Keywords
grocery retailers, capital structure, business risk (β) analysis, financial statement analysis, investment decision
[1]. A Food Industry Web Guide. (2022) Who are the Top 10 Grocers in the United States? https://www.foodindustry.com/articles/top-10-grocers-in-the-united-states-2019/.
[2]. USDA, Economic Research Service (ERS). (2022) Retail Trends.https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-markets-prices/retailing-whol esaling/retail-trends/.
[3]. U.S. Cencus Bureau. (2023) Advance Monthly Sales for Retail and Food Services. http://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf.
[4]. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023) 12-Month Percentage Change, Consumer Price Index, Selected Categories. https://www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-by-category-line-chart.htm.
[5]. Ahmed, Maamoun. (2019) The U.S Grocery Industry in the 2020s: Who will come out on top?. Global Journal of Business Disciplines, 3(1), 98-106.
[6]. Ezeala-Harrison, Fidel., Baffoe-Bonnie, John. (2016) Market Concentration in the Grocery Retail Industry: Application of the Basic Prisoners’ Dilemma Model. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 6(1), 47-67.
[7]. Bernstein, Fernando., Song, Jing-Sheng., Zheng, Xiaona. (2008) Bricks-and-Mortar vs. Clicks-and-Mortar: an Equilibrium Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 671-690.
[8]. Catherine, S., Solo, Joyce. (2021) Future Retailing Strategies in Grocery Retailing. Aegaeum Journal, 9(9), 29-33.
[9]. Williamson, Peter.J., Zeng, Ming. (2009) Value-for-Money Strategies for Recessionary Times. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2009/03/value-for-money-strategies-for-recessionary-times.
[10]. Farah Freihat, Abdel Razaq. (2019) Factors Affecting Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E): Evidence from the Emerging Market. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 9(2), 47-56.
Cite this article
Wan,W. (2023). Comparison of Three Different Companies in the US. Retail Industry Based on Beta (β-risk) Analysis and Financial Statement Analysis: Costco vs. Walmart vs. Target. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,39,247-258.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Economic Management and Green Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).