Download pdf
Unveiling the Endowment Effect: Understanding Its Significance and Applications
- 1 Northeastern University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The endowment effect is a widespread prevalent cognitive bias that affects people’s decision-making process in various aspects. This phenomenon is mainly because of people’s cognitive biases towards certain things. The primary manifestation of this cognitive bias is that when a person owns an item or asset, his/her evaluation of the value of the item or asset is more significant than when he does not own the item or asset. Thus, this research paper aims to unveil the significance and applications of the endowment effect and its relationship with risk aversion. Meanwhile, the paper will also explore how individuals tend to assign higher value to items they own. To conduct this research, a comprehensive literature review was performed to examine existing studies on the endowment effect, loss aversion and related behavioural economics theories. Real-life examples and case studies were also analyzed to illustrate the practical implications of these cognitive biases. The findings of this research paper demonstrate that the endowment effect and loss aversion are deeply ingrained in people’s decision-making process, leading individuals to make emotional rather than rational choices.Understanding the endowment effect is crucial for making informed decisions, as it allows individuals to distinguish between subjective and objective thinking. While it may not eliminate these biases from decision-making processes, strategies such as seeking outside perspectives, considering alternatives, and conducting thorough analyses may mitigate the endowment effect’s influence.
Keywords
Endowment effect, Cognitive bias, Loss aversion
[1]. Achtypi, E., Ashby, N. J., Brown, G. D., Walasek, L., & Yechiam, E. (2021). The endowment effect and beliefs about the market. Decision, 8(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000143
[2]. Ganti, A. (2023, February 21). Endowment effect: Definition, what causes it, and example. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/endowment-effect.asp
[3]. Zheng, J. (2023). Are Financial Markets at all Times Rational?. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 10(2), 237-244.
[4]. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
[5]. Thomas, K. J., & Nguyen, H. (2022). Status gains versus status losses: Loss aversion and deviance. Justice Quarterly, 39(4), 871-896.
[6]. Van Dijk, E., & Van Knippenberg, D. (1996). Buying and selling exchange goods: Loss aversion and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(4), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(96)00017-7
[7]. Arlen, J., Spitzer, M., & Talley, E. (2002). Endowment effects within corporate agency relationships. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), 1-37.
[8]. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
[9]. Zhang, Z., Zhang, N., & Wang, J. (2022). The influencing factors on impulse buying behavior of consumers under the mode of hunger marketing in live commerce. Sustainability, 14(4), 2122.
[10]. Hamilton, R., Thompson, D., Bone, S., Chaplin, L. N., Griskevicius, V., Goldsmith, K., Hill, R., John, D. R., Mittal, C., O’Guinn, T., Piff, P., Roux, C., Shah, A., & Zhu, M. (2019, May 15). The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys. Experts@Minnesota. https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/the-effects-of-scarcity-on-consumer-decision-journeys
[11]. Aluri, A., Price, B. S., & McIntyre, N. H. (2019). Using machine learning to cocreate value through dynamic customer engagement in a brand loyalty program. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 43(1), 78-100.
[12]. Otuteye, E., & Siddiquee, M. (2020). Underperformance of actively managed portfolios: some behavioral insights. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 21(3), 284-300.
[13]. Korobkin, R. (1998). Inertia and preference in contract negotiation: The psychological power of default rules and form terms. Vand. L. Rev., 51, 1583.
[14]. Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: The winner’s curse. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2.1.191
[15]. Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(1), 66.
[16]. Levy, J. S. (2003). Applications of prospect theory to political science. Synthese, 135, 215-241.
Cite this article
Guo,Y. (2024). Unveiling the Endowment Effect: Understanding Its Significance and Applications. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,60,199-205.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).