Research Article
Open access
Published on 19 April 2024
Download pdf
Guo,S.;Chen,D.Y.;Ye,W. (2024). The Evidence Against Hunter-gatherer Theory: The Evolution of Gender Differences. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,46,256-262.
Export citation

The Evidence Against Hunter-gatherer Theory: The Evolution of Gender Differences

Shiyu Guo *,1, David Yang Chen 2, Wenxi Ye 3
  • 1 University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
  • 2 Shanghai Pinghe School
  • 3 Changjun High School International Department

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/46/20230884

Abstract

Hunter-gatherer theory in evolutionary psychology has been the theoretical underpinning of many modern ideas and stereotypes. However, modern archaeology and biology advancements suggest a more flexible understanding of female-male roles during the Stone Age than previously believed. This paper critically examines the recent evidence that challenges the conventional Hunter-gatherer theory, addressing the topic through three distinct lenses: Firstly, Drawing from contemporary archaeological findings, the authors argue that the prehistoric division of labor diverges from the Hunter-gatherer theory's traditional stance on female gathering and male hunting. Recent studies, for instance, have unveiled evidence of female hunters in ancient societies, challenging long-held beliefs. Secondly, the authors delve into the gender dynamics of long-distance running ability, a specific manifestation often attributed to gender differences by the Hunter-gatherer theory. This exploration seeks to understand the balance between male and female capabilities. Thirdly. Through a comparative analysis of historical variances in dietary preferences and height differences, juxtaposed with their societal implications, the authors introduce the "Gender Binary Cycle" as a more fitting framework to elucidate the origins of contemporary gender disparities.

Keywords

Evolutionary Psychology, Anthropology, Hunter-Gatherer theory, Gender Binary Cycle, Gender differences

[1]. Lee, R. B., Daly, R. H., Daly, R., & Press, C. U. (1999). The Cambridge. Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge University Press.

[2]. Sustainable Development Goals | United Nations Development Programme. (n.d.). UNDP. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals

[3]. Haas, R., Watson, J. T., Buonasera, T., Southon, J., Chen, J. C., Noe, S. J., Smith, K., Llave, C. V., Eerkens, J. W., & Parker, G. J. (2020). Female hunters of the early Americas. Science Advances, 6(45). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0310

[4]. Anderson, A., Chilczuk, S., Nelson, K., Ruther, R., & Wall-Scheffler, C. M. (2023). The Myth of Man the Hunter: Women’s contribution to the hunt across ethnographic contexts. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0287101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287101

[5]. Pohl, R. F. (2012). Confirmation bias. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies. and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Psychology Press.

[6]. Krasnow, M. M., Truxaw, D., Gaulin, S. J. C., New, J., Ozono, H., Uono, S., Ueno, T., & Minemoto, K. (2011). Cognitive adaptations for gathering-related navigation in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.003

[7]. Besson, T., Macchi, R., Rossi, J., Morio, C. Y., Kunimasa, Y., Nicol, C., ... & Millet, G. Y. (2022). Sex differences in endurance running. Sports Medicine, 52(6), 1235-1257.

[8]. Cureton, K. J. (1981). Matching of male and female subjects using VO2 max. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 52(2), 264-268.

[9]. Almonroeder, T. G., & Benson, L. C. (2017). Sex differences in lower extremity. kinematics and patellofemoral kinetics during running. Journal of sports sciences, 35(16), 1575-1581.

[10]. Chumanov, E. S., Wall-Scheffler, C., & Heiderscheit, B. C. (2008). Gender. differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clinical biomechanics, 23(10), 1260-1268.

[11]. Phillips, S. M., Atkinson, S. A., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & MacDougall, J. D. (1993). Gender differences in leucine kinetics and nitrogen balance in endurance athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology, 75(5), 2134-2141.

[12]. Hunter, S. K. (2016). The relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 48(11), 2247.

[13]. Ross, A. (2019b). The woman who crashed the Boston marathon. JSTOR Daily. https://daily.jstor.org/the-woman-who-crashed-the-boston-marathon/

[14]. Admin. (2014). The marathon and gender equality. Sociology Lens Insights. https://www.sociologylens.net/topics/collective-behaviour-and-social-movements/the-marathon-and-gender-equality/13203

[15]. Saguy, T., Reifen-Tagar, M., & Joel, D. (2021). The gender-binary cycle: the. perpetual relations between a biological-essentialist view of gender, gender ideology, and gender-labelling and sorting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200141. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0141

[16]. Berbesque, J., & Marlowe, F. W. (2009). Sex Differences in Food Preferences of. Hadza Hunter-Gatherers. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 147470490900700. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700409

[17]. Dong, Y., Morgan, C., Chinenov, Y., Zhou, L., Fan, W., Ma, X., & Pechenkina, K. (2017). Shifting diets and the rise of male-biased inequality on the Central Plains of China during Eastern Zhou. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(5), 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611742114

[18]. Marciniak, S., Bergey, C. M., Silva, A. M., Hałuszko, A., Furmanek, M., Veselka, B., Velemínský, P., Vercellotti, G., Wahl, J., Zariņa, G., Longhi, C., Kolář, J., Garrido-Pena, R., Fernández, R. F., Corral, A. M. H., Simalcsik, A., Müller, W. A., Sheridan, A., Miliauskienė, Ž.,. Perry, G. H. (2022). An integrative skeletal and paleogenomic analysis of stature variation suggests relatively reduced health for early European farmers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106743119

[19]. Macintosh, A. A., Pinhasi, R., & Stock, J. T. (2017). Prehistoric women’s manual. labor exceeded that of athletes through the first 5500 years of farming in Central Europe. Science Advances, 3(11). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3893

[20]. Collins, B. C., Laakkonen, E. K., & Lowe, D. A. (2019). Aging of the. musculoskeletal system: How the loss of estrogen impacts muscle strength. Bone, 123, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.03.033

Cite this article

Guo,S.;Chen,D.Y.;Ye,W. (2024). The Evidence Against Hunter-gatherer Theory: The Evolution of Gender Differences. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,46,256-262.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

Conference website: https://www.icgpsh.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-361-6(Print) / 978-1-83558-362-3(Online)
Conference date: 13 October 2023
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.46
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).