Download pdf
Right, Wrong, Logic and Mentality
- 1 Maharishi International University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper explores the nuanced relationship between right, wrong, logic, and mentality in ethical decision-making. It argues that ethical judgments are deeply subjective and context-dependent, influenced by individual and collective experiences, cultures, and cognitive frameworks. The paper introduces the metaphor of mentality as the fabric of the mind and logic as Lego pieces, illustrating how cognitive flexibility and logical structure interact to shape our moral understanding. While advocating for a fluid and adaptable approach to morality, the paper asserts the absoluteness of wrongs when actions cause significant harm. The "Twelve Gates of Wrong" framework is proposed to systematically evaluate ethical decisions, emphasizing harm avoidance. This model integrates traditional ethical theories—virtue ethics, deontology, and consequentialism—while addressing the complexities of modern moral dilemmas. By balancing cognitive flexibility with logical integrity, the paper offers a comprehensive roadmap for ethical reflection and decision-making, urging a principled and empathetic approach to minimize harm and foster societal well-being.
Keywords
Right, Wrong, Logic, Mentality
[1]. C. D. Brown, “Fundamental mentality in a physical world,” Synthese, vol. 199, no. 1–2, pp. 2841–2860, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02914-7.
[2]. V. Pishchik, “Features of the mentality of generations X, Y, Z,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 210, p. 20007, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021020007.
[3]. P. N. Johnson-Laird, S. S. Khemlani, and G. P. Goodwin, “Logic, probability, and human reasoning,” Trends Cogn Sci, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 201–214, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.006.
[4]. J. St. B. T. Evans, “Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm.,” Psychol Bull, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 978–996, 2002, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.978.
[5]. F. M. Kamm, The moral target: Aiming at right conduct in war and other conflicts. Oxford University Press, 2012.
[6]. W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” 2003.
[7]. L. Alexander and M. Moore, “Deontological ethics,” 2007.
[8]. M. Slote, “Virtue ethics,” in The Routledge companion to ethics, Routledge, 2010, pp. 478–489.
[9]. J. CAÑAS, J. QUESADA, A. ANTOLÍ, and I. FAJARDO, “Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks,” Ergonomics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 482–501, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1080/0014013031000061640.
[10]. D. P. O’Brien, “Human reasoning includes a mental logic,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 96–97, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000429.
[11]. B. Inhelder and J. Piaget, The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures, vol. 22. Psychology Press, 1958.
[12]. S. Aburass, “Consciousness and Greed: A Mathematical Model of Human Greed and Its Behavioral Implications,” Communications in Humanities Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 112–116, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.54254/2753-7064/11/20231394.
[13]. B. Draganski et al., “Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Brain Structure Changes during Extensive Learning,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 23, pp. 6314–6317, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4628-05.2006.
[14]. B. Uzzi, S. Mukherjee, M. Stringer, and B. Jones, “Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact,” Science (1979), vol. 342, no. 6157, pp. 468–472, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1240474.
[15]. Y. Zahidjan, “CHANGES IN SOCIETY’S POLITICAL MENTALITY,” American Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 62–67, 2023.
[16]. V. Tiberius, “Well-being: Psychological research for philosophers,” Philos Compass, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 493–505, 2006.
[17]. J. Page, Peace education: Exploring ethical and philosophical foundations. IAP, 2008.
[18]. S. Banks and A. Gallagher, Ethics in professional life: Virtues for health and social care. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008.
[19]. L. Floridi, The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, USA, 2013.
[20]. J. Mandal, D. K. Ponnambath, and S. C. Parija, “Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine,” Trop Parasitol, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 5, 2016.
[21]. K. Kitto and S. Knight, “Practical ethics for building learning analytics,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2855–2870, 2019.
[22]. F. Lieder, M. Prentice, and E. R. Corwin-Renner, “An interdisciplinary synthesis of research on understanding and promoting well-doing,” Soc Personal Psychol Compass, vol. 16, no. 9, p. e12704, 2022.
[23]. S. Kagan, Normative ethics. Routledge, 2018.
[24]. I. Manners, “The normative ethics of the European Union,” Int Aff, pp. 45–60, 2008.
[25]. H. J. McCloskey, Meta-ethics and normative ethics. Springer, 2013.
Cite this article
Aburass,S. (2024). Right, Wrong, Logic and Mentality. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,59,40-48.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).