References
[1]. Moberly, Michael D. (2014). Safeguarding Intangible Assets. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-12-800516-3.
[2]. Goldstein, Paul; Reese, R. Anthony (2008). Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines: Cases and Materials on the Law of Intellectual Property (6th ed.). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-59941-139-2.
[3]. Dictionary of the Social Sciences (2008) [2002]. Calhoun, Craig (ed.). "Sociology". New York: Oxford University Press – via American Sociological Association. Sociological views of IP, and particularly those of patenting, are scarce.
[4]. Ford, Laura R. 2021. The intellectual property of nations: sociological and historical perspectives on a modern legal institution. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[5]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[6]. March, James and Simon, Herbert. 1956. Bounded Rationality and Satisficing. Pp. 145-151 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[7]. Australian Government, IP Australia. [Superceded] Intellectual Property Government Open Data 2018 | Datasets | data.gov.au - beta. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-24a216fc-97e6-41b3-b13b-77c972922003/details
[8]. The World Bank Group. Data: GDP (current US$). Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
[9]. Olson, Marcus. Public Goods and the Free Rider Problem. Pp. 162-170 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[10]. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. Precontractual Solidarity. Pp. 193 - 206 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[12]. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. Precontractual Solidarity. Pp. 193 - 206 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[13]. Yingyun, Xu. Apr. 2012. A study on the impact of patent application on college students' employment and entrepreneurship. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Sciences).
[14]. Sujun, Xing. Dec. 2009. Patent Intelligence Education and Entrepreneurial Talent Cultivation. Modern Intelligence, pp171-173.
[15]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[16]. Summerfield, Mark. May, 2018. New Data Released by IP Australia Provides Fascinating Insights into Patent History ~ paleontology. Patentology. blog.patentology.com.au/2018/05/new-data-released-by-ip-australia.html
[17]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[18]. The State Intellectual Property Office of China. China’s Patent Survey Report of 2021. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/col/col88/index.html?uid=669&pageNum=1.
[19]. Mead, George. H. Thought as Internalized Conversation. Pp. 291-305in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cite this article
Li,M. (2023). A Sociological Perspective on Why People Go for Intellectual Property Rights. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,5,1-5.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 4
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Moberly, Michael D. (2014). Safeguarding Intangible Assets. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-12-800516-3.
[2]. Goldstein, Paul; Reese, R. Anthony (2008). Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines: Cases and Materials on the Law of Intellectual Property (6th ed.). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-59941-139-2.
[3]. Dictionary of the Social Sciences (2008) [2002]. Calhoun, Craig (ed.). "Sociology". New York: Oxford University Press – via American Sociological Association. Sociological views of IP, and particularly those of patenting, are scarce.
[4]. Ford, Laura R. 2021. The intellectual property of nations: sociological and historical perspectives on a modern legal institution. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[5]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[6]. March, James and Simon, Herbert. 1956. Bounded Rationality and Satisficing. Pp. 145-151 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[7]. Australian Government, IP Australia. [Superceded] Intellectual Property Government Open Data 2018 | Datasets | data.gov.au - beta. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-24a216fc-97e6-41b3-b13b-77c972922003/details
[8]. The World Bank Group. Data: GDP (current US$). Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
[9]. Olson, Marcus. Public Goods and the Free Rider Problem. Pp. 162-170 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[10]. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. Precontractual Solidarity. Pp. 193 - 206 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[11]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[12]. Durkheim, Emile. 1915. Precontractual Solidarity. Pp. 193 - 206 in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.
[13]. Yingyun, Xu. Apr. 2012. A study on the impact of patent application on college students' employment and entrepreneurship. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Social Sciences).
[14]. Sujun, Xing. Dec. 2009. Patent Intelligence Education and Entrepreneurial Talent Cultivation. Modern Intelligence, pp171-173.
[15]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[16]. Summerfield, Mark. May, 2018. New Data Released by IP Australia Provides Fascinating Insights into Patent History ~ paleontology. Patentology. blog.patentology.com.au/2018/05/new-data-released-by-ip-australia.html
[17]. Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
[18]. The State Intellectual Property Office of China. China’s Patent Survey Report of 2021. https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/col/col88/index.html?uid=669&pageNum=1.
[19]. Mead, George. H. Thought as Internalized Conversation. Pp. 291-305in Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings., edited by R. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press.