How People Learn: Cognitive Monitoring

Research Article
Open access

How People Learn: Cognitive Monitoring

Haoran Wang 1*
  • 1 Education Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, 92617, America    
  • *corresponding author 767912229@qq.com
LNEP Vol.6
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-915371-37-9
ISBN (Online): 978-1-915371-38-6

Abstract

Metacognition is the cognition of cognition. Metacognition is like an observer who is always watching the process of his or her learning, the cognitive process for any problems and errors. This article focuses on the study of metacognitive monitoring as one of the learning processes used to improve student learning. The article elaborates on how metacognitive learning is used to acquire knowledge through progressive learning, critiques the questionable practice of metacognitive learning, and provides a comparative analysis with other learning styles. An in-depth study of metacognition can help further correct and optimize our thinking styles and outcomes and is an essential advancement in our knowledge learning.

Keywords:

Metacognition, Reflection, Learning

Wang,H. (2023). How People Learn: Cognitive Monitoring. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,6,96-101.
Export citation

References

[1]. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

[2]. Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 141-144.

[3]. Nasir, N. I. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. Cambridge University Press, 687-709.

[4]. Skinner, B. F. (2012). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Stones, Edgar. Readings in Educational Psychology. London: Routledge Verlag, 301.

[5]. Norman, E. (2020). Why metacognition is not always helpful. Frontiers in psychology, 1537.

[6]. Bond, M., Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British journal of educational technology, 50(1), 12-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730

[7]. Lavoie, P., Michaud, C., Belisle, M., Boyer, L., Gosselin, E., Grondin, M. ... & Pepin, J. (2018). Learning theories and tools for the assessment of core nursing competencies in simulation: A theoretical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13416

[8]. Locklear, A. K. (2020). Review of Major Learning Theories: A Mindtool for understanding and applying theoretical concepts. J Ment Health Soc Behav, 2, 108. https://gexinonline.com/uploads/articles/article-jmhsb-108.pdf

[9]. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive-affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

[10]. Horsburgh, J., & Ippolito, K. (2018). A skill to be worked at: using social learning theory to explore the process of learning from role models in clinical settings. BMC medical education, 18(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1251-x

[11]. Kuk, H. S., & Holst, J. D. (2018). A dissection of experiential learning theory: Alternative approaches to reflection. Adult Learning, 29(4), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045159518779138


Cite this article

Wang,H. (2023). How People Learn: Cognitive Monitoring. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,6,96-101.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 5

ISBN:978-1-915371-37-9(Print) / 978-1-915371-38-6(Online)
Editor:Muhammad Idrees, Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga
Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/
Conference date: 18 December 2022
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.6
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

[2]. Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(3), 141-144.

[3]. Nasir, N. I. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. Cambridge University Press, 687-709.

[4]. Skinner, B. F. (2012). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Stones, Edgar. Readings in Educational Psychology. London: Routledge Verlag, 301.

[5]. Norman, E. (2020). Why metacognition is not always helpful. Frontiers in psychology, 1537.

[6]. Bond, M., Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British journal of educational technology, 50(1), 12-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730

[7]. Lavoie, P., Michaud, C., Belisle, M., Boyer, L., Gosselin, E., Grondin, M. ... & Pepin, J. (2018). Learning theories and tools for the assessment of core nursing competencies in simulation: A theoretical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13416

[8]. Locklear, A. K. (2020). Review of Major Learning Theories: A Mindtool for understanding and applying theoretical concepts. J Ment Health Soc Behav, 2, 108. https://gexinonline.com/uploads/articles/article-jmhsb-108.pdf

[9]. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive-affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

[10]. Horsburgh, J., & Ippolito, K. (2018). A skill to be worked at: using social learning theory to explore the process of learning from role models in clinical settings. BMC medical education, 18(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1251-x

[11]. Kuk, H. S., & Holst, J. D. (2018). A dissection of experiential learning theory: Alternative approaches to reflection. Adult Learning, 29(4), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045159518779138