Download pdf
Space Metaphor in the Representation of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Embodied Cognition Perspective
- 1 School of Government and Public Affairs, Communication University Of China, Beijing, 100024, China
- 2 Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
- 3 Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Research on embodied cognition is becoming increasingly crucial as society develops. To study embodied spatial metaphor, this study examines the relationship between perceived distance and understanding of abstract and concrete words. Concrete words are usually considered to be relatively close to people’s lives, while abstract words are not. Thirty-five participants between the ages of 18 and 29 participated in the study. They were asked to make either “concrete” or “abstract” responses quickly and accurately to words displayed on a screen, where words were presented to be either distance or in close proximity to the participant. The response time for correct answers was recorded. The results show that the reaction time of the abstract words with a short distance is not significantly longer than that of the abstract words with a long distance, while the results of the concrete words are consistent. According to the results, it can conclude that there is no significant relationship between spatial metaphor and the nature of words.
Keywords
Embodied Cognition, Spatial Metaphor, Verbal Concreteness.
[1]. Foglia, L. and Wilson, R.A. (2013), Embodied cognition. WIREs Cogn Sci, 4: 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1226
[2]. Anderson, M.L. (2003) Embodied Cognition: A field guide, Artificial Intelligence, Volume 149, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 91-130, ISSN 0004-3702, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7.
[3]. Farina M. (2021) Embodied cognition: dimensions, domains and applications. Adaptive Behavior, 29(1), 73-88. doi:10.1177/1059712320912963
[4]. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). Mental models, space, and embodied cognition. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 495–522). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-018
[5]. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6.
[6]. Tang, P., Ye, H., Du, J. (2015). The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(4), 514-521.
[7]. Qu, Z.(2020).A study of embodied cognitive mechanisms in the understanding of Chinese concrete and abstract verbs. Master's thesis, Hebei University. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202002&filename=1020640707.nh
[8]. Zhou, F.(2017).A study on the embodied cognitive representation of abstract and concrete emotion words. Master's thesis, Hebei University.
[9]. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
[10]. Henderson, M. D., Wakslak, C. J., Fujita, K., & Rohrbach, J. (2011). Construal level theory and spatial distance: Implications for mental representation, judgment, and behavior. Social Psychology, 42(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000060
[11]. Coltheart M. (1981) The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 1981;33(4):497-505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
Cite this article
Deng,K.;Yang,X.;Ye,S. (2023). Space Metaphor in the Representation of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Embodied Cognition Perspective. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,5,238-243.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 4
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).