Research Article
Open access
Published on 14 February 2025
Download pdf
Xiong,D. (2025). On the Limitations of Electoral Systems in Expressing the Will of the People. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,85,36-42.
Export citation

On the Limitations of Electoral Systems in Expressing the Will of the People

David Xiong *,1,
  • 1 Buckingham Browne and Nichols School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.20911

Abstract

This paper examines the topic of the extent to which elections reflect the will of the people, a crucial precondition for free and fair elections, cornerstones of a country’s democratic system. This study analyzes free will from two perspectives—the personal and social—identifying education, critical thinking, and the ability to access reliable information as necessary conditions for free will. Conducting a historical-based analysis, this work assesses the mechanisms through which dictators in authoritarian regimes use the role of the ‘election’ as a guise for masking totalitarian oppression. Next, it addresses the more subtle but equally perilous danger of demagogic leaders who take advantage of voter fears and prejudices to pretend to represent the citizens’ will. Lastly, the paper examines how various external factors, even in the framework of a perceived democratic electoral system, can usurp the people’s power. Namely, the nature of big data and targeted political advertising with predictive algorithms, along with disenfranchisement of marginalized groups and inherent flaws in seemingly democratic electoral systems—including the Electoral College or Israel’s fragmented parliamentary system—call into question the strength of the people’s will. The paper then argues that mitigating the flaws that subvert the people’s will necessitates large-scale reforms on a social and institutional level.

Keywords

free will, elections, demagoguery, social media, and disenfranchisement

[1]. Lichtman, A. (2024). The keys to the White House: Predicting the 2024 winner. Harvard Data Science Review, 6(4).

[2]. Dahl, R.A. (2020). On democracy. Yale University Press.

[3]. Schedler, A. (Ed.). (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

[4]. Levitsky, S., and Way, L.A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.

[5]. Muller, J.W. (2016). On the origins of constitutional patriotism. In Patriotism (pp. 95-112). Routledge.

[6]. Muddle, C. (2019). The far right today. John Wiley & Sons.

[7]. Persily, N. (2017). Can democracy survive the internet? Journal of Democracy, 28, 63.

[8]. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., and Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

[9]. Wei, Z., Xu, X., and Hui, P. (2024). Digital democracy at crossroads: A meta-analysis of web and AI influence on global elections. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024 (pp. 1126-1129).

[10]. Anderson, C. (2018). One person, no vote: How voter suppression is destroying our democracy. Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.

[11]. Berman, A. (2015). Give us the ballot: The modern struggle for voting rights in America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[12]. Mebane, W. (2024). eForensics analysis of the Venezuela 2024 presidential elections. University of Michigan, August 11.

[13]. Hunter, W., and Power, T.J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30, 68.

[14]. Palsma, A. (2024). Exploring demagoguery and political rhetoric’s impact through social media. Honors Thesis, 324.

[15]. Guess, A.M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J.M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., and Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536-15545.

[16]. Marsden, C., Meyer, T., and Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law and Security Review, 36.

[17]. Iyer, L., and Mami, A. (2012). Traveling agents: Political change and bureaucratic turnover in India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 723-739.

[18]. Maffucci, M. (2018). The electoral college: A system “for the people?”

[19]. Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Cite this article

Xiong,D. (2025). On the Limitations of Electoral Systems in Expressing the Will of the People. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,85,36-42.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies

Conference website: https://2025.icsphs.org
ISBN:978-1-83558-957-1(Print) / 978-1-83558-958-8(Online)
Conference date: 14 February 2025
Editor:Kurt Buhring
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.85
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).