The Tension Between State Capacity and the Order of Democratisation: A Comparative Study of Political Transition in East Asia and Latin America

Research Article
Open access

The Tension Between State Capacity and the Order of Democratisation: A Comparative Study of Political Transition in East Asia and Latin America

Zhanrui Liu 1*
  • 1 Wuhan University    
  • *corresponding author 3329923007@qq.com
Published on 20 June 2025 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.24111
LNEP Vol.102
ISSN (Print): 2753-7056
ISSN (Online): 2753-7048
ISBN (Print): 978-1-80590-207-2
ISBN (Online): 978-1-80590-208-9

Abstract

This study focuses on East Asia and Latin America, conducting an in-depth analysis of the intrinsic relationship between state capacity, the sequence of democratisation, and economic development. The findings reveal that East Asian countries have achieved rapid economic growth through strong state intervention capabilities, scientific economic planning, and targeted industrial policies. In contrast, Latin American countries have been plagued by political instability, institutional fragility, and challenges in social governance, resulting in weak state capacity and fluctuating economic development. In terms of democratisation, East Asian countries adopted a 'development first, democracy later' model, successfully laying the economic foundation for democratic transition. In contrast, Latin American countries' early democratic experiments were hindered by institutional deficiencies, and later democratisation efforts brought new economic challenges. There exists a complex tension between state capacity and the sequence of democratisation. East Asian countries achieved a smooth transition through coordination mechanisms, while Latin American countries fell into a vicious cycle of political and economic instability.

Keywords:

state capacity, order of democratisation, political transformation, economic development

Liu,Z. (2025). The Tension Between State Capacity and the Order of Democratisation: A Comparative Study of Political Transition in East Asia and Latin America. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,102,12-17.
Export citation

References

[1]. Iman Dawood. (2025). Exclusion-politicization: Salafism, democracy, and counterpublic politics in the UK. Democratization, 32 (3), 684-705.

[2]. Bhawna Pokharna & Sarika Dubey. (2025). Editorial: Peace, democracy and liberal international order. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1559444-1559444.

[3]. Zhan Shengchen & Xie Yue. (2025). Foundation of the Political Resilience in China: A Perspective of State Capacity. Journal of Contemporary China, 34 (152), 295-311.

[4]. Radek Buben & Karel Kouba. (2024). Democracy and Institutional Change in Times of Crises in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 16 (1), 90-109.

[5]. Chitadze, N., & Cheishvili, N. (2019). Political and Economic Consequences of the U.S. Policy in Latin America. Journal in Humanities, 7(1), 13–25.


Cite this article

Liu,Z. (2025). The Tension Between State Capacity and the Order of Democratisation: A Comparative Study of Political Transition in East Asia and Latin America. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,102,12-17.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

ISBN:978-1-80590-207-2(Print) / 978-1-80590-208-9(Online)
Editor:Enrique Mallen
Conference website: https://2025.icgpsh.org/
Conference date: 25 July 2025
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.102
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Iman Dawood. (2025). Exclusion-politicization: Salafism, democracy, and counterpublic politics in the UK. Democratization, 32 (3), 684-705.

[2]. Bhawna Pokharna & Sarika Dubey. (2025). Editorial: Peace, democracy and liberal international order. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1559444-1559444.

[3]. Zhan Shengchen & Xie Yue. (2025). Foundation of the Political Resilience in China: A Perspective of State Capacity. Journal of Contemporary China, 34 (152), 295-311.

[4]. Radek Buben & Karel Kouba. (2024). Democracy and Institutional Change in Times of Crises in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 16 (1), 90-109.

[5]. Chitadze, N., & Cheishvili, N. (2019). Political and Economic Consequences of the U.S. Policy in Latin America. Journal in Humanities, 7(1), 13–25.