Research Article
Open access
Published on 1 March 2023
Download pdf
Li,A. (2023). Should John Locke Institute Change Its Name?. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,707-713.
Export citation

Should John Locke Institute Change Its Name?

Andrew Li *,1,
  • 1 Shanghai American School Puxi, Shanghai, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/3/2022294

Abstract

John Locke, an English philosopher, faces increased scrutiny over his affiliation with slavery at the height of the Black Lives Matter movement. The educational organization, John Locke Institute, continues to honor the name of Locke, despite the rising controversy. The aim of this paper is to examine the principal legacy of Locke and assess his involvement in the institution of slavery. This paper concludes that the John Locke Institute should not change its name, providing insight into the principles of renaming and offering a comparison to other acts of renaming monuments and institutions in the status quo.

Keywords

legacy, slavery, Renaming

[1]. Wood G. (The Atlantic), 2020. “Yale Doesn’t Need to Change Its Name.” www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/troll-campaign-rename-yale/613684/.

[2]. Uzgalis W. (The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), 2020. “John Locke.” https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/locke/

[3]. Cox, M. (John Locke Institute), Accessed 2020. “Director’s Welcome.” https://www.johnlockeinstitute.com/directors-welcome.

[4]. Brewer H. Slavery, Sovereignty, and “Inheritable Blood”: Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American SlaverySlavery, Sovereignty, and “Inheritable Blood”[J]. The American Historical Review, 2017, 122(4): 1038-1078.

[5]. Cottrol R J. Liberalism and paternalism: ideology, economic interest and the business law of slavery[J]. American Journal of Legal History, 1987, 31(4): 359-373.

[6]. Ladd M. Slavery and abortion: the paradox of american liberalism[M]. Wayne State University, 2012.

[7]. Salvoey, P. (Yale University), 2020. “Decision on the Name of Calhoun College." president.yale.edu/president/statements/decision-name-calhoun-college.

[8]. Fisher G P. Life of Benjamin Silliman, MD, LL. D., Late Professor of Chemistry, Mineralogy, and Geology in Yale College: Chiefly from His Manuscript Reminiscences, Diaries, and Correspondence[M]. C. Scribner, 1866. pp. 98-99.

[9]. Grove J G. John C. Calhoun's Theory of Republicanism[M]. University Press of Kansas, 2016.

[10]. Locke J. Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration[M]. Yale University Press, 2008.

[11]. Hinshelwood B. The Carolinian Context of John Locke’s Theory of Slavery[J]. Political Theory, 2013, 41(4): 562-590.

[12]. Farr J. Locke, natural law, and new world slavery[J]. Political Theory, 2008, 36(4): 495-522.

Cite this article

Li,A. (2023). Should John Locke Institute Change Its Name?. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,3,707-713.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2022), Part II

Conference website: https://www.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-915371-09-6(Print) / 978-1-915371-10-2(Online)
Conference date: 4 August 2022
Editor:Abdullah Laghari, Nasir Mahmood
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.3
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).