References
[1]. Fagioli, A. (2021) To exploit and dispossess: The twofold logic of platform capitalism. Work organization, labour & globalization.15(1), 126-137.
[2]. Gerlitz, C., Helmond, A. (2013) The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New media & society, 15(8), 1348-1365.
[3]. Duguay, S. (2019) “Running the numbers”: Modes of microcelebrity labor in queer women’s self-representation on Instagram and Vine. Social media+ society, 5(4), 2056305119894002.
[4]. Abidin, C. (2017) # familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media+ Society, 3(2), 2056305117707191.
[5]. Zheng, S. X. (2021) The “Sacred Labor” that is stared at and ignored--re”—— Anthropological comparison and reflection on the study of delivery riders. New Vision, 6), 77-83.
[6]. Fuchs, C. (2021) Social Media: A Critical Introduction.3rd ed. UK: SAGE Publication Ltd.
[7]. Xinhua net. (2017) 95s generation’s notion of employeement.Xinhuanet.com.Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-04/24/c_1120860496.htm
[8]. Satora, A. (2023) Key Influencer Marketing Statistics to Drive Your Strategy in 2023. Retrieved from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-statistics/
[9]. IMS. (2021) Chinese influencer economy development report. Retrieved from https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202108021507528798_1.pdf
[10]. Sun, P., Qiu, L. C., Yu, H. Q. (2021) Platform as A Method:Labour, Technology and Communication. Journalism and Communication,28,8-24.
[11]. Bauman, Z. (1983) Industrialism, consumerism and power. Theory, Culture & Society, 1(3), 32-4.
Cite this article
Zhang,Y. (2023). Free to Be Bound: Labor Relations and Labor Process of Social Media Influencers. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,8,334-339.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Fagioli, A. (2021) To exploit and dispossess: The twofold logic of platform capitalism. Work organization, labour & globalization.15(1), 126-137.
[2]. Gerlitz, C., Helmond, A. (2013) The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New media & society, 15(8), 1348-1365.
[3]. Duguay, S. (2019) “Running the numbers”: Modes of microcelebrity labor in queer women’s self-representation on Instagram and Vine. Social media+ society, 5(4), 2056305119894002.
[4]. Abidin, C. (2017) # familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labor. Social Media+ Society, 3(2), 2056305117707191.
[5]. Zheng, S. X. (2021) The “Sacred Labor” that is stared at and ignored--re”—— Anthropological comparison and reflection on the study of delivery riders. New Vision, 6), 77-83.
[6]. Fuchs, C. (2021) Social Media: A Critical Introduction.3rd ed. UK: SAGE Publication Ltd.
[7]. Xinhua net. (2017) 95s generation’s notion of employeement.Xinhuanet.com.Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-04/24/c_1120860496.htm
[8]. Satora, A. (2023) Key Influencer Marketing Statistics to Drive Your Strategy in 2023. Retrieved from https://influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-statistics/
[9]. IMS. (2021) Chinese influencer economy development report. Retrieved from https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202108021507528798_1.pdf
[10]. Sun, P., Qiu, L. C., Yu, H. Q. (2021) Platform as A Method:Labour, Technology and Communication. Journalism and Communication,28,8-24.
[11]. Bauman, Z. (1983) Industrialism, consumerism and power. Theory, Culture & Society, 1(3), 32-4.